Thread by @battresahar

🧵What is a likely origin of our era as a consequence of earlier conclusions - a different viewpoint that connects our Universe with a previous one. #bigbang #inflation #ufotwitter

https://twitter.com/battresahar/status/1481759228117372929?s=20&t=nl2AA1SqoMitr5vsLDgA-g

How can we explain a universe with various parts that’s never been in contact (non-overlapping light-cones) and yet have similar properties as temperature and flatness? To explain them, we must explain a much more extreme flatness in early stages of the universe.

We can associate observables to inflationary theories due to the wavelength perturbations that position our current viewpoint outside the horizon from a period before the end of inflation until the relatively near present.

The reason would be sub horizons, each a local event horizon with different time. The local (initial) velocity of inflation of the universe was identical to the speed of light, along these lines the photons would ride with the sub horizons.

What we observe is a shrinking comoving horizon leading to horizon exit and reentry.

Eventually inflation ends when the resonance becomes inefficient. The final stages of inflation and thermalization of its decay products can be described with reheating.

Reheating does not seem to be a superposition of single states, if we look at the cosmic web we realize that the initial seed likely was a homogeneous non-helical oscillating field.

The original oscillating field would leave decay products, as well as inflationary energy surviving the preheating, hinting at new physics, thought to be dark matter & dark energy.

Cosmological constant is related to Higgs field and the amount of mass in the universe. Dark energy as a concept is likely a field description, a gravitational potential in an open system.

Aharonov-Bohm effect applies to gravitational fields, that is, particles can feel the influence of spacetime warping even if they aren’t subject to gravitational forces, i.e when moving along the influence. (Hint at space and time being thermal states, a saturation)

Mass warps spacetime, and warped spacetime moves mass in defined ways. Torsion causes gravity and time dilation on large scales and small scales. Torsion is also caused by magnetic fields due to the paramagnetic behavior of QCD.

Torsion follows the Wick rotation of expressions, and is negative in the transverse of the rotation. An opposite of torsion would be an s-wave MF as it would elongate, instead of a torus we get a hyperbolic foam loop.

We can conclude that spacetime isn't a fixed crystalline material rather a foamy crystalline carrier. Is it mass that warps spacetime or warped spacetime that can be expressed as mass. Likely the latter, and mass is the torus/accumulation around an expression.

A horizon is caused by the pauli exclusion principle; saturation will force the fermions to line up as they get stuck in the horizon in a spiral pattern moving in synchronicity.

In a situation when the horizon is created around a black hole the Wick rotation of fermions will follow the torsion of spacetime, and the saturation will slow down the content relative to the outside observer causing time dilation, enlargening the gap between inner/outer horizon

Inside a black hole we have a polarized bosonic system due to the paramagnetic behavior of QCD and the fact that it passed through the horizon. Fermions are stuck as a metallic surface of what could be said to be a 2d bosonic system.

The system is extreme and lacking dimensions as an outside observer, the universe is holographic so it’s not really 2d (but close enough).

In a stacked system it’s easy to picture the system as an oscillating field; whenever the tension is released it will start moving again and spacetime will be unstacked. (when then?)

Torsion creates time dilation, due to the deterministic nature of the universe - an intrinsic behavior (or need) to describe interactions, and torsion is a thermal state (gravity).

The more particles we have in a context the slower the interactions (passage of time) will be due to possible outcomes.

The deterministic nature gives us a decision tree of interactions, if you disable some of the possible interactions the saturation will be lower in that direction.

Inertial mass will be affected in the direction where the interaction points are lower, thus a directed pressure release from the surrounding thermal state.

As mass is accumulation of paramagnetic fabric around an expression a system that is compacted until expressions can't move will reach a superconducting state where the accumulation will be sorted and pointed in the direction of the MFs (you now have a field).

The accretion will be directional since we have non existing wick rotation, next phase will be a fizzling as expressions move in synchrony.

The fermionic-bosonic system was polarized when passing the inner horizon, and when the new timelines start one possible pattern woulld be puddles/rifts with local sub horizons moving in oscillating s-waves that would fizzle. (a cosmic reset)

In a black hole tension is released almost immediately from an inside perspective, we just happen to be at a different time from the outside.

Keep in mind that there is no entry point in 3d, inflow will be from all directions into the bosonic system, since it was compacted into 2d. All matter entering from the beginning to end of the previous era will happen at once.

Since mass is the paramagnetic accumulation around an expression and we have an oscillating field with directional torsion we have no gravitational impact. (we have no mass yet)

Instead we have an instantaneous outward pressure with a center for each puddle, and each being it’s own sub-horizon and part of the origin of the cosmic web. When the oscillation becomes narrow and inefficient we enter the decay phase of inflation.

This is all a thought based on research I read earlier and gives some context to the other thread, use as you see fit (if there are some nuggets you like)

@threadreaderapp unroll