Nick Tiller, Ph.D. Profile picture
May 28 β€’ 13 tweets β€’ 6 min read
π‘πžπ­π«πšπœπ­πžπ #vitaminD paper.
"The originally-published data are inaccurate and a complete set of corrected data is not available."

Here's a thread to outline the worrying data irregularities that led to this retraction.
#exercise #science #nutrition #research 🧡1/13
First and foremost, you can read here the full EIC retraction notice: β™Ύdoi.org/10.1123/ijsnem…

β™ΎAnd my "Letter to The Editor" in which I describe in more detail the most serious/perplexing issues: tinyurl.com/2p8f5mj7
🧡2/13
I learned about this study after Dr. Rhonda Patrick (Ph.D. in biomedical science) shared it among her nearly 400,000 Twitter followers who, in turn, retweeted it more than 500 times. 🧡3/13
The authors claim that 60 days of supplementation with low-dose vitamin D increased absolute VO2max (L/min) by 28%. Not only is this unprecedented for such an intervention but there was no associated change in relative VO2max (mL/kg/min). 🧡4/13
The authors didn't report body mass (!?). Still, basic arithmetic shows that an increase in absolute VO2max of this magnitude, without change in relative values, requires an increase in body mass of ~18 kg (~40 lbs) over 60 days. Physiologically impossible. 🧡5/13
The authors consider these responses authentic. 🧡6/13
The other main outcome was a unilateral increase in handgrip strength with vitamin D (increased strength in the left but not the right arm). Again, the authors claim this result is authentic but provide no valid explanation. 🧡7/13
Crucially, they tested for differences using 𝐚𝐭 π₯𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭 14 t-tests without correcting for familywise error. This increases the probability of a false-positive to >πŸ“πŸŽ%. The difference in forearm strength is not significant after a Bonferroni adjustment (p=0.098)🧡8/13
Reporting of data was also inconsistent. Instead of reporting variance as IQR, the authors opted to report median (min-max). However, Table 2 clearly shows median (25th-75th percentiles), indicating that the authors are trying to conceal outliers in the data. 🧡9/13
There were many other concerns with the manuscript, including numerous occasions in which the authors cited references that were non-existent or those that did not support their assertions. See "Letter" for specific examples. 🧡10/13

Link: tinyurl.com/2p8f5mj7
Ultimately, the paper was retracted for the reasons outlined by the Editor in Chief.
β™Ύdoi.org/10.1123/ijsnemβ€¦πŸ§΅11/13
Despite these obvious issues, the paper had an Altmetric score of 321 at the time of retraction, placing it in the 𝐭𝐨𝐩 πŸ“% of all research outputs. It was shared nearly 700 times on Twitter alone. 🧡12/13
It's a symptom of a broader problem in science, but we can learn important lessons: 1) Be skeptical of extraordinary claims unless supported by extraordinary evidence; 2) The devil is in the detail; 3) We must read beyond headlines & abstracts before sharing to social media.13/13

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Nick Tiller, Ph.D.

Nick Tiller, Ph.D. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NBTiller

Oct 14, 2021
I was asked recently to provide some examples of health and fitness marketing that makes false claims and/or exploits human biases. I came up with a billion examples. Here are just 6:

#science #skepticism #criticalthinking #exercise #health
1/6. All-natural #wheyprotein. It exploits the irrational cognitive bias towards natural products.
2/6. L-carnitine sold for decades as a β€˜fat burner’ despite research which failed to show consistent and reliable outcomes.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 12, 2021
The official #Olympics website endorsing #cryotherapy as an effective form of post-exercise recovery. Despite the fact the literature is very unimpressive, littered with low-quality studies, and tiny effects. #IOC

#science #pseuodscience #sport #exercise

olympics.com/en/video/the-c…
A Cochrane review says it concisely: ImageImage
Even the FDA are ahead of the game on this one, which is rare: fda.gov/consumers/cons… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(