LawBeat Profile picture
Jun 7 7 tweets 3 min read
BREAKING: Calcutta High Court has upheld the order of CBI investigation into the murder of @INCIndia Councillor Tapan Kundu. His wife and nephew had alleged that Kundu was murdered by the goons of #TMC with the help of Inspector-in-charge of the area.
It has also been alleged that the Inspector-in-Charge of the Police Station had resorted to various unfair means to stop
the candidates from contesting against the ruling party. #TMC
The @INCIndia Councillor’s family has also informed the court that numerous false criminal proceedings were also initiated against the contesting candidates of Congress and other
political parties. This was done at the behest of the ruling party #TMC
A Single judge of the Calcutta High Court had held that the main accused in the case are police officers and a Councillor of the ruling party. Hence, investigation and prosecution
by West Bengal Police will NOT BE PROPER. #TMC
The Single Judge also noted that the person who is alleged to have facilitated the crime, i.e. the Inspector-in-Charge of a Police Station has NOT BEEN TAKEN INTO CUSTODY TILL NOW and WAS PERFORMING HIS OFFICIAL DUTIES. #TMC #WestBengal
Single Judge also noted that the two political parties the INC and TMC. They had won five seats each in the Jhalda Municipal Elections and two other seats were won by . THE DEATH OF KUNDU WOULD have clearly tilted the balance of control of power of Jhalda to TMC.
Calcutta High Court Directs CBI Investigation Into Murder Of Congress Councillor
@sai_prasad_law reports
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ca…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

Jun 8
#SupremeCourt to hear plea seeking direction to conduct special stray round in #NEETPG counselling for the vacant seats.
Counsel submits that Sr Adv Balbir Singh is not available today.

Justice MR Shah: No No you call him, this is a very important matter.
You first tell us whether there are vacant seats?
Counsel: Yes Milords, there is.

Justice Shah: Even if there is one vacant seat it should not go unfilled. What you'll get by keeping the seats vacant when we need doctors, is there any responsibility or not. Let the Higher Authority present tomorrow, we'll pass orders.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 7
Civil Judge (Sr. D.), Varanasi Court Ravi Kumar Diwakar, has received a #threat letter allegedly written by one Kashif Ahmed Siddiqui. The judge had ordered sealing of the spot at #Gyanvapi complex where #Shivlinga shaped structure has been found.
#GyanvapiShivling Image
The letter states:
"Muslim of divided India knows very well that under pressure of nuturere of extremist Hindus, genocidal, Gurjrati #PrimeMinister of divided India, you will declare Gyanvapi mosque as temple and will call Mughals as tyrant robbers."
#GyanvapiSurvey
#gyanvapi
"Organizations like #RSS and all the affiliated Hindu extremist organizations and your #ModiJi have hatched a conspiracy to organize riots in #UP on the lines of Gujarat," it adds.
#Gyanvapi #GyanvapiSurvey
Read 6 tweets
Jun 7
Millions of worshippers of lord Guruvayurappan are residing all over the country, donations to the deity cannot be utilized countrywide: Kerala High Court
#kerala #Temple #donations
Court dismissed State's review petition against its earlier judgment holding Rs. 5 crore donations from Guruvayoor Devaswom Funds to the Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund illegal. State had argued that money was given for relief of lord's devotees across the country.
Court said that Section 27(c) of the Guruvayur Devaswom Act,1978 cannot be stretched to interpret that money devoted to the diety can be given for benefit of worshippers beyond a particular geographical limit.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 7
"Places constructed in derogation of the personal law, cannot be termed as a 'place of worship'," another plea in #SupremeCourt has challenged the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.
The plea states, "Retrospective cutoff-date was fixed 15th August 1947 (of the Act) to legalize the illegal acts of barbaric invaders. Though, Hindu Law was ‘Law in force’ at the commencement of the Constitution."
#placesofworshipact
PIL filed by @anilkabotra through Advocate Ashwini Kumar Dubey has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 2, 3, and 4 of the #placesofworshipact.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 6
Noting that a hypertechnical and mechanical approach shall do no good to the parties, #AllahabadHighCourt grants bail to a rape accused.
The barely major young man had allegedly enticed away his alleged minor lover and got her pregnant. The girl child is 3.5 years old now.
Court took note of the youth's submission that he and the victim were lovers and due to fear of families and co-villagers who were against their alliance as the two belonged to the same village and community, they eloped and the girl's father filed a case against him.
Court said, "In this conservative and non-permissive society, it is true that marriage in the same village is prohibited and is not customary, and it may be an after effect of media and cinema, instances of marriage in the same village are on the rise."
Read 6 tweets
Jun 6
In #KarnatakaHighCourt the bench headed by CJ Ritu Raj Awasthi is hearing a PIL seeking protection of street dogs. CJ says “When I go for a walk at Cubbon park in #Bengaluru , there are so many street dogs that it gets difficult to walk. People take care of them so well.”
The counsel says “Whenever there is an incident of attack by Street dogs, the authorities come to the area. Take them and completely destroy them. This cannot be done.”
BREAKING: #KarnatakaHighCourt issues notice to the government and ask them to find out if the government has taken steps to implement Animal Birth Control (Birth) Rules, 2001.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(