Given the non-dom billionaire-owned Daily Mail's support for the neofascist #Rwanda plan, here's a thread about Left-hating Harold Harmsworth - 1st Lord Rothermere, owner of the Mail - specifically his vocal support for both Hitler, & Mosley's British Union of #Fascists.
Devised in 1896 by Alfred Harmsworth (Viscount Northcliffe) & his brother Harold (Lord Rothermere), the Mail has campaigned against Unions & the Left, & against all women & most working-class men being given the vote.
By 1930, they owned 14 national daily & Sunday newspapers.
Harold Harmsworth (Lord Rothermere) was a great supporter of Adolf Hitler.
According to James Pool, author of 'Who Financed Hitler': "Shortly after the Nazis' sweeping victory in the election of September 14, 1930, Rothermere went to Munich to have a long talk with Hitler."
Ten days after the 1930 election, Rothermere wrote an article discussing the significance of the National Socialists' triumph.
The article drew attention throughout England and the Continent because it urged acceptance of the Nazis as a bulwark against Communism.
Rothermere continued to insist that if it were not for the Nazis, the Communists might have gained the majority in the Reichstag.
The by now grotesquely wealthy Rothermere went so far as to provide funds to Adolf Hitler via Ernst Hanfstaengel.
When Hitler became Chancellor in 1933, Rothermere produced a series of articles acclaiming the new regime:
"I urge all British young men & women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents."
"The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia." - Harold Harmsworth (Rothermere) in The Daily Mail, 10th July, 1933.
"They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call "Nazi atrocities" which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence... which have been generalized, multiplied & exaggerated."
"The German nation was rapidly falling under the control of its alien elements. In the last days of the pre-Hitler regime there were twenty times as many Jewish Govt officials in Germany as had existed before the war."
Rothermere pointed out Hitler's critics were on the Left.
According to the German historian Hans-Adolf Jacobsen, the Mail's foreign correspondent, George Ward Price, developed a very close relationship with Adolf Hitler.
Rothermere, George Ward Price, Hitler, Fritz Wiedemann, Joseph Goebbels, Princess Stephanie & Magda Goebbels, 1936:
"The correspondent of the London Daily Mail, Ward Price, was welcomed to interviews in the Reich Chancellery in a more privileged way than all other foreign journalists... His paper supported Hitler more strongly & more constantly than any other newspaper outside Germany."
Hitler regarded Ward Price as "the only foreign journalist who reported him without prejudice", & in his autobiography, Ward Price defended himself, claiming: "I reported Hitler's statements accurately, leaving British newspaper readers to form their own opinions of their worth."
Hitler wrote to Rothermere: "I should like to express the appreciation of countless Germans, who regard me as their spokesman, for the wise & beneficial public support which you have given to a policy that we all hope will contribute to the enduring pacification of Europe." 12/33
"We are fanatically determined to defend ourselves against attack. We reject the idea of taking the initiative in bringing about a war. I am convinced that no one who fought in the front trenches during the world war, no matter in what European country, desires another conflict."
As Martin Pugh suggests in his history of British interwar #fascism, Rothermere was “perhaps the most influential single #propagandist for fascism between the wars.”
As early as 1931, Rothermere had given his full support to Oswald Mosley & the National Union of Fascists.
Rothermere offered to place “the whole of the Harmsworth press at Mosley's disposal”, believing Mosley & his fledgling Fascists represented - like today's ERG - "sound, commonplace, Conservative doctrine", inspired by "loyalty to the throne & love of country".
The infamous 'Hurrah for the Blackshirts' article appeared on 22nd January, 1934.
"Timid alarmists have been whimpering that the rapid growth in numbers of the British Blackshirts is preparing the way for a system of rulership by means of steel whips and concentration camps."
"Very few of these panic-mongers have any personal knowledge of the countries that are already under Blackshirt government. The notion that a permanent reign of terror exists there has been evolved entirely from their own morbid imaginations, fed by sensational #propaganda."
"As a purely British organization, the Blackshirts will respect those principles of tolerance which are traditional in British politics. They have no prejudice either of class or race. Their recruits are drawn from all social grades & every political party."
In 1934, David Low, an Evening Standard cartoonist, drew a cartoon showing Rothermere as a nanny giving a Nazi salute & saying "we need men of action such as they have in Italy & Germany who are leading their countries triumphantly out of the slump... blah... blah... blah..."
The child in the pram is saying "But what have they got in their other hands, nanny?" Hitler & Mussolini are hiding the true records: "Hitler's Germany: Estimated Unemployed: 6M. Fall in trade under Hitler, £35,000,000. Burden of taxes up several times over. Wages down 20%."
Lord Beaverbrook, the owner of the Evening Standard, was a close friend & business partner of Lord Rothermere, & refused to allow the original cartoon to be published. At the time, Rothermere had a virtual monopoly on the UK press, & controlled 49% of the Evening Standard shares.
Low was told by one of Beaverbrook's men: "Dog doesn't eat dog. It isn't done." He was forced to make the nanny unrecognisable as Rothermere & had to change the name on her dress from the Daily Mail to the Daily Shirt.
The Daily Mail continued to support the fascists. In 1934, Mosley founded the January Club as a discussion group to attract establishment support for the movement. Lord Rothermere allowed fellow member, Tory MP Sir Thomas Moore, to publish pro-fascist articles in his newspaper.
Tory MP Moore described the British Union of Fascists as being "largely derived from the Conservative Party". He added "surely there cannot be any fundamental difference of outlook between the Blackshirts and their parents, the Conservatives?"
In April 1934, The Daily Mail published an article by Winston Churchill's son & future Tory MP, Randolph Churchill (who in 1935 sponsored a member of the BUF), praising a Mosley speech: "Sir Oswald's peroration was one of the most magnificent feats of oratory I have ever heard."
The London Evening News, also owned by Harold Harmsworth, found a different way of supporting the Blackshirts. It obtained 500 seats for a BUF rally at the Royal Albert Hall & offered them as prizes to readers sending in the most convincing reasons why they liked the Blackshirts.
Rothermere's The Sunday Dispatch even sponsored a Blackshirt beauty competition to find the most attractive British Union of Fascists supporter. Nobody entered & the contest was declared void.
Mosley announced a large British Union of Fascists rally at Olympia on 7th June, 1934. The Daily Worker issued a statement declaring that the Communist Party of GB intended to demonstrate against Mosley by organized heckling inside the meeting & a mass demonstration outside.
The CPGB did what it could to disrupt the meeting: "They (the CPGB) printed illegal tickets. Groups of hecklers were stationed at strategic points inside the meeting, & Press interviews with their members were organized outside. First-aid stations were set up in near-by houses...
...and there were the inevitable parades, banners, placards and slogans." - Robert Benewick, author of The Fascist Movement in Britain (1972).
About 500 anti-fascists including Vera Brittain, Richard Sheppard & Aldous Huxley, managed to get inside the hall.
When they began heckling Mosley they were attacked by 1,000 black-shirted stewards. Several of the protesters were badly beaten by the fascists: "A young woman carried past me by five Blackshirts, her clothes half torn off and her mouth and nose closed by the large hand of one".
Collin Brooks, a journalist who worked for Lord Rothermere at the The Sunday Dispatch, attended the the rally at Olympia.
Brooks wrote in his diary: "The Fascist technique is really the most brutal thing I have ever seen, which is saying something."
Brooks also commented that one of his "party had gone there very sympathetic to the fascists and very anti-Red", but as they left the meeting he said "My God, if it's to be a choice between the Reds and these toughs, I'm all for the Reds".
Several members of the Conservative Party attended. Tory MP Geoffrey Lloyd pointed out that Mosley stopped speaking at once for the most trivial interruptions, although he had a battery of twenty-four loud-speakers. The interrupters were then attacked by ten to twenty stewards.
Lloyd wrote that Mosley's tactics were calculated to provide an "excuse" for violence.
Tory MP William Anstruther-Gray: "Frankly if anybody had told me an hour before the meeting that I should find myself on the side of the Communist interrupters, I'd have called him a liar."
George Ward Price of The Daily Mail disagreed: "If the Blackshirts movement had any need of justification, the Red Hooligans who savagely and systematically tried to wreck Sir Oswald Mosley's huge and magnificently successful meeting at Olympia last night would have supplied it."
In the Parliamentary debate on the BUF rally, several Tory MPs defended Mosley; Michael Beaumont by admitting that he was an "anti-democrat & an avowed admirer of Fascism in other countries"; Tom Howard admired Mosley for his 'determination to maintain the right of free speech'.
Clement Attlee, then Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, claimed to have evidence to demonstrate that the Blackshirts used "plain-clothes inciters to disorder" at their meetings and that the Blackshirts used deliberate incitement as an excuse for force.
Walter Citrine, the General Secretary of the Trade Union Congress, demanded an end to "the drilling and arming of civilian sections of the community", and deplored the inactivity of the police and the courts in dealing with the British Union of Fascists."
PM Stanley Baldwin admitted similarities between the @Conservatives & the BUF "the policies of fascism is what you may call an Ultramontane Conservatism... it takes many of the tenets of our own party and pushes them to a conclusion which (would) be disastrous to our country."
In July, 1934 Lord Rothermere suddenly withdrew his support from Mosley. Historian James Pool argues "The rumour on Fleet Street was that the Daily Mail's Jewish advertisers had threatened to place their adds in a different paper if Rothermere continued the pro-fascist campaign."
Rothermere met with Hitler at the Berghof & told him how the "Jews cut off his complete revenue from advertising" & compelled him to "toe the line." Hitler later recalled Rothermere telling him that it was "quite impossible at short notice to take any effective counter-measures."
Vernon Kell, of MI5, reported to the Home Office that the rally at Olympia appeared to have had a negative impact on the future of the British Union of Fascists: "It is becoming increasingly clear that at Olympia Mosley suffered a check which is likely to prove decisive."
"He suffered it, not at the hands of the Communists who staged provocations & now claim victory; but at the hands of Conservative MPs, Conservative press, & all those organs of public opinion which made him abandon the policy of using his Defence Force to overwhelm interrupters."
We must #NeverForget that it was Rothermere's Daily Mail - which today supports the UK Government's barbaric #Rwanda Plan, which is reminiscent of the Nazi's Madagascar Plan - which led the campaign against Jews fleeing from Europe being allowed into Britain. #NeverAgain
In August 1938, the Daily Mail published the despicable & abhorrent headline: "Aliens Pouring into Britain".
The Mail's jingoistic, xenophobic, racist & neofascist rhetoric is a hair's breadth away from its contemporary anti-migrant, anti-asylum seeker, & anti-Muslim rhetoric.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reform UK’s slick, stage-managed launch of a Christian Fellowship in St Michael’s Church is not some harmless Christmas-season publicity stunt. It is a clear and brazen step towards the Trumpification of UK politics, where religion is weaponised as a tool for cultural warfare and political mobilisation.
This is not organic Christian revival. It’s strategic political engineering.
Behind this development sit figures who have spent years trying to inject a US-style fusion of right-wing politics and religious identity into British political culture:
• Paul Marshall
A billionaire media financier with a clear ideological project: to build a hard-right cultural and religious counter-establishment. Through GB “News”, The |Spectator and UnHerd and other platforms he has amplified narratives about “woke attacks” on tradition, identity, and Christianity. The Islamophobic tweets he liked are disgusting. His network provides the media oxygen for precisely the kind of politicised Christianity on display at the Reform launch.
• James Orr
A Cambridge academic and prominent Anglican conservative intellectual, closely connected to the “post-liberal” movement and hard-right US conservative and Hungarian organisations. Orr openly promotes the idea of restoring Britain’s “Christian identity” through politics — a framing that sits uncomfortably close to the Christian-nationalist rhetoric of the US right. His advisory role to senior Reform figures is a clear sign of the ideological hardening underway.
• Danny Kruger
Long known for advocating a more “muscular” Christian politics, Kruger has repeatedly argued that the UK should explicitly root its laws and social policy in “Judeo-Christian values” - a dog whistle I explain in the next tweet.
This is the British echo of US culture-war evangelicalism: turning religion into a political badge, not a spiritual or moral tradition. His involvement in shaping Reform’s policy direction cements the party’s shift toward faith-infused populism.
• Calvin Robinson
Though no longer in the Church of England, disgraced former GBN presenter and political extremist Robinson remains one of the most prominent voices pushing an aggressive “anti-woke, anti-liberal” form of Christianity in the media — including endorsing narratives that paint inclusive or progressive churches as heretical. His alignment with Reform’s messaging shows how the party is deliberately courting polemical, grievance-driven Christian activism.
Together, these figures represent a new coalition: a British attempt to import the US religious-right model, with all its corrosive social consequences.
Using St Michael’s Cornhill — a church rooted in the conservative evangelical network — as the backdrop for this political spectacle is shocking in a UK context.
This is not merely a “religious event attended by politicians.” It was a political rally held in a church, wrapped in Anglican aesthetics.
The Church of England has historically avoided such political entanglement precisely because it knows how dangerous it is to let a religious institution become a vessel for partisan identity politics.
Britain is not America — but Reform UK wants to change that
What we are seeing is the deliberate construction of a political identity rooted in far-right themes lurching toward a contemporary form of Christofascism:
grievance Christianity
nostalgia for a mythic “Christian Britain”
hostility to minorities and multiculturalism
anti-LGBTQ+ theology rebranded as “family values”
anti-immigrant populism framed as moral duty
and a narrative of cultural siege identical to the US evangelical right
It is the Trump playbook, translated into British idiom.
This is disturbing, because once a political movement fuses religious identity with national identity, democratic debate changes: Opponents are no longer wrong — they are heretical. Policies are no longer argued — they are sanctified. Compromise becomes betrayal. And politics becomes a zero-sum culture war.
Britain has largely avoided this polarising poison. Reform UK is now trying to inject it directly into the bloodstream of national politics.
Reform UK’s “Christian Fellowship” is not about faith. It is the public unveiling of a British Christian-nationalist project — backed by wealthy ideologues, amplified by culture-war media, and borrowing heavily from the most divisive elements of the US right.
It is a serious warning sign of where Reform UK intends to take the country: toward a politics defined by religious grievance, cultural division, and the erosion of the pluralistic norms that have protected Britain from the worst excesses of American political extremism.
How have populist UK politicians and Britain’s right-wing press and broadcasters got away with repeating — day after day, year after year — the brazenly false and wildly misleading claim that we live in a “high-welfare, high-tax” country?
The claim that Britain is a “high-welfare, high-tax” country is a shameless lie—brazenly false—as OECD and OBR data consistently show: the UK's tax take is ~36% of GDP (mid-table globally, and well under the EU average of 40.5%).
The UK's total tax take of 36% is far under France's 45% or Denmark's 46%. Welfare benefits spending (including state pensions) is a modest ~11% of GDP—among the lowest in the OECD, well below the EU average of 17.5%, and just under half that of France (20.5%) and Italy (20%).
Not only has Nigel Farage shamelessly normalized far right discourse, but Reform UK have welcomed a new generation of young, radicalised, Andrew Tate fanboys who think it's acceptable to spread divisive bigoted lies and disinformation, and to make crass bigoted 'jokes'.
Joseph Boam is a radicalised 22-year-old Tate fanboy who started out as a Tory, running as a district councillor, then switching to Reform UK in 2024 and becoming a councillor in May 2025 representing the Whitwick division on Leicestershire County Council for the Reform UK party.
A former KFC worker, who has worked with his dad on sheds and property renovation, despite his total lack of any relevant experience or knowledge of the area, he was appointed Council deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care—which ispatently absurd.
Across the West, figures such as Trump, JD Vance, Farage, Johnson, Tice, Kruger, and Lowe helped normalise far-right populist rhetoric within mainstream politics. Their appeal is anti-elite—yet they themselves embody the privilege they claim to challenge.
A multibillion-dollar scheme that exchanges cash from drug and gun sales in the UK for crypto—digital tokens hiding users’ identities—has enabling “sanctions evasions and the highest levels of organised crime, including providing money-laundering services to the Russian state”. theguardian.com/politics/2025/…
In 2023, the hedge fund co-founded by GB "News" owner Paul Marshall, who employs 60% of anti-Net Zero Reform UK's MPs, had £1.8 BILLION invested in fossil fuel firms.
Harborne (who has Thai citizenship under the name 'Chakrit Sakunkrit) also makes money from fossil fuels.
I and countless others are sick to death of the billionaire-funded Reform UK propaganda machine, GB “News”, and their decontextualised ‘facts’ that would make Goebbels blush.
Let’s examine the claim that “one quarter of foreign sex offenders come from just five countries”.
Yes, the raw data comes from a genuine Ministry of Justice (MoJ) prison census, but the way it’s being weaponised is deeply misleading.
The statistic sounds explosive, and deliberately so: a factoid engineered to sound like a revelation of hidden danger.
The right-wing information pipeline: a cherry-picked fragment of official data stripped of context, laundered through an opaquely funded “think tank” that isn't a think tank, amplified by billionaire-funded media, and weaponised by opportunistic politicians for electoral gain.