Carl Sagan was an avowed nonbeliever -- but in 'Contact,' as one of his biographers put it, he gave us "one of the most religious science-fiction tales ever written.” 25 years after the film opened, I look at its continuing influence, for @NautilusMag: nautil.us/a-surprising-s…
^^ It was a pleasure to speak with @SashaSagan for this story, along with radio astronomer Yvette Cendes (@whereisyvette) -- one of many women scientists whose career path was shaped by "Contact."
3/ And for extra fun, some of us here at the Complex Systems Summer School (hosted by @sfiscience) arranged for a screening tonight. More comments to come; but let me just say that 25 years later, I think #Contact holds up very well.
4/ First of all, radio astronomy is front and center in this movie – rare indeed in a Hollywood blockbuster. We get to see both the Arecibo telescope and the Very Large Array – as I mention in the article, the VLA could be said to be Jodie Foster’s *real* co-star in the film.
5/ And while the final third of the film is fantasy, the first two-thirds are all too real – with Foster’s character (Ellie Arroway) having to beg for funding; and with a male colleague taking credit for her accomplishments. 😡
6a/ The New Mexico desert scene, following the public announcement that there’s been an intelligent signal from space, is the best (and most believable) scene in the whole movie...
6b/ I think it would play out exactly like that in real life, with every conceivable alien “enthusiast” descending on the VLA. (Watch from 1:13 onward.)
7/ What to say about Ellie and Palmer… I mean, did their relationship even have to happen? Also, he’s some sort of Christian philosopher-author… why does he turn up everywhere? Why does he get invited to the White House?
8a/ As Keay Davidson writes in his biography of Sagan, the filmmakers spent “a comical amount of time trying to figure out how to hitch up Ellie romantically to someone – anyone – no matter how badly he suited her.” 😐
8b/ Eventually Palmer Joss, the philosopher played by McConaughey, was shoehorned into the role. 🫤
9/ What do you think of the movie’s science-versus-faith theme? 🔭🔬🧬 ↔️ ✝️☪️✡️ Is it overwrought? Is it unnecessary? Once you decide to include it, I figure it sorta has to play out as depicted in the film (which is fairly faithful to the novel, in that regard, if I recall)…
10a/ For whatever reason, The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) despised the film. I only quote a brief snippet of their review in my story. But there’s more...
10b/ ...for example: “So leaden is its dramatic thrust that not even director Zemeckis, whose productions usually travel at the speed of light, can get this one moving faster than a mule train.” :/ 🦙🦙🦙
11/ Some things to nitpick: The person who goes in the machine wouldn’t be an astronomer. It just wouldn’t be. An Air Force pilot, perhaps. 🚀 But not an astronomer.
12/ And of course, astronomers these days don’t actually have to be at the observatory; the vast majority of work is done remotely. But then we wouldn’t have those terrific scenes at the VLA. Anyway, small potatoes. ("Don't Look Up" has this issue, too.)
13/ Contact is not a masterpiece. But it’s still one of the best (and certainly one of the more cerebral) alien-themed movies out there, from the past few decades, IMHO. Happy 25th, #Contact!
15/ As Shannon points out (in more detail than I do in my story), the #Contact struck a chord with many young women, and helped steer the career-path of many now-established women scientists.
16/ As @shannonmstirone wrote: "when the film was released, few space odysseys featured women in leading roles. Today, we have films like Interstellar and Gravity, but the depiction of women in popular culture as scientists, engineers, and leaders is sadly still quite scarce."
18/ On a side note, it was extra cool to watch the film in New Mexico -- like watching "Jaws" in Martha's Vineyard, I guess!
19/ And in the realm of trivia... #Contact is one of only two movies I can think of where we explicitly hear the phrase "Einstein-Rosen Bridge" (the other being the not-very-good 2006 film "Déjà Vu").
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Fascinating re the tobacco companies in the 1950s; @LeeCMcIntyre explains how they managed to convince journalists to tell “both sides” of the smoking-and-cancer “debate.”
3/ The scariest part of science denial is how it has spilled over into reality denial, says @LeeCMcIntyre.
“The good journalism has gotten better, and the bad journalism has gotten a lot worse.” — @picardonhealth summarizing how #science#journalism has changed since 1987, in tonight’s @RCIScience event, underway now.
2/ @picardonhealth cautions against “false balance” — the all-too- common practise of pretending that two opposing points of view are equally valid (which is especially problematic in health & science reporting). #scicomm
3/ “Take the time to do it right.” — @picardonhealth says it really doesn’t matter if his story comes out five minutes after, say, the TO Star’s version of the story. “Only journalists worry about that.”
1/n #Hanukkah comes super early this year – it starts tonight! – and in fact, this is the earliest that it *can* occur. Let’s talk about why that’s so! (thread 🧵 ) #Hanukkah2021
2/ The date of #Hanukkah is determined (no surprise) by the Hebrew calendar, not by the Gregorian calendar. More specifically, Hanukkah begins on the 25th day of the Hebrew month of Kislev...
3/ The Hebrew calendar is “lunar-solar,” which means it uses months based on the cycle of the moon’s phases, but also attempts to synch up with the annual cycle of the seasons…
1/n According to numerous colleagues on Twitter, Nobel Laureate physicist Steven Weinberg has died. He was a towering intellect. I'm sure much of the coverage to come will focus on his contributions to science, but (cont'd) (Photo: Jeff Wilson/The Guardian)
2/ ...he was also a first-rate science communicator. His books, and his essays in the @nybooks, were illuminating and authoritative, regardless of the topic.
3/ This is perhaps the most famous -- or infamous? -- thing that he wrote:
No-one: Dan, I see the donut-shaped universe idea is back in the news. Didn't you write about that in the last century?
Me: Yes; yes I did. A big eight-page spread in @SkyandTelescope, July 1999, on the topology of the universe: (#space#physics#donuts)
And look how they wrapped the headline around the first double-page spread, Pac-Man style. Pretty neat (and apt)!
And actually it all started (for me, anyway) with a workshop that @gstarkman organized at @cwru back in 1997. Good (and simpler) times!
@AstroKatie@yorkuniversity@YorkUScience 2. The big bang happened ~13.8 billion years ago. So what lies ahead? Could the universe collapse in a big crunch? Maybe – but as Prof. Mack explained, it's more likely that it will keep expanding. In fact, the universe is currently not only expanding but also accelerating...
@AstroKatie@yorkuniversity@YorkUScience 3. We seem to live in a universe with a non-zero cosmological constant. Right now, the CC appears small – but in the far future, the CC could come to dominate. That won’t end well! At best, in that scenario, we’re going to freeze to death in the dark...