WEF (World Economic Forum), WHO (World Health Organization), IMF (International Monetary Fund) and a whole bunch of non democratic, unelected organizations try to control the narratives of this free world.
We can’t follow them blindly, a thread 🧵👇
@wef Klaus and the Davos crowd are scared that they'll lose control of their #GreatReset narrative if #Bitcoin succeeds as a worlds top currency
They wanna control what you do
They wanna control what you eat
They wanna control what you own
They wanna control what you drink
They wanna control what you think
Ze future will be built by us
Zou will be controlled by us
Zour bodies will be controlled by us
Zour media will be controlled by us
Zour food will be controlled by us
Zour minds are under our control
Zour ownership is under our control
Zwe own you 👉
Yeah right… like China 🇨🇳 gives a damn about Klaus & his west goons 😂
The way media works is exposed
The way narratives work is exposed
The way they milk issues is exposed
- COVID pandemic
- Ukraine war
- Climate crisis
This guy is hellbent on running the 🌍
Justin Trudeau investing over $100 million into a WEF program called KTDI - Known Traveler Digital Identity
A social credit system for the west 🤷♂️
WEF is developing an individual carbon footprint tracker. Sounds awesome right. How about hiding all those trackers for the top 0.01% elite and opening up trackers for the masses.
It’s all about controlling the masses by centralizing more power 🤷♂️
If WEF says you’ll be happy, you won’t
If WHO says it’s deadly, it isn’t
If big Pharma says it works, it doesn’t
If media states something, it’s false
If politicians promise you, they lie
They’ll own private jets, but you need to cut down on your travel & gas
They’ll own the robotaxi fleet, while you stop buying cars & get rides from those robotaxis
They’ll own the animal farms, animal meats while you get to eat bugs
Do WEF global technocrats have god complex… if god created organic entities, they’ll create inorganic entities like robots & cyborgs
People who are allergic to shellfish are also allergic to crickets 🦗
We are going to open a huge can of worms with potentially new allergies
WEF wants y’all poor & helpless
- don’t drive
- don’t eat meat
- don’t own vehicles
- keep injecting their vaccines
- automate jobs to cyborgs
- control your thought processes
- health signal pills into your bodies
Collectively they can monitor & control
- what we eat
- what we drink
- what we think
- what diseases we’re susceptible to
- what medicines we take
- what our DNA profiles are
A dire warning to WEF — Klaus Schwab & his goons
How it started… How it’s going…
In May 2022 a 43 car potash (fertilizer ingredient) carrying train was derailed in Canada which you might have never heard of…
China is by far the biggest environmental polluter in the world and it doesn’t give a shit about WEF policies, ESG concerns, pollution levels… yet farmers in Netherlands suffer from WEF pollution controls.
WEF is a joke, ESG is a joke
UN climate initiative is a joke
This is getting ridiculously out of hand.
They want you to stop eating meat, start eating bugs, start drinking cockroach 🪳 milk, stop farting WTF
You’ll own nothing & be happy
You’ll drive nothing & be happy
You’ll eat bugs & you’ll be happy
They want you to rent clothes instead of buying clothes and be happy…
They can instantly identify you based on the digital ids sewn into clothes…
WEF 2030 targets per person
- 0 kg meat consumption
- 0 kg dairy consumption
- 2500 calories per day
- 3 new clothes per year
- 0 private vehicles
- 1 short haul return flight in 3 years
They control food, travel, entertainment while you lick your wounds & suck your thumbs 🤷♂️
Historically taking a loan from the IMF has been with the touch of evil
It always comes with strings attached, always ends up really bad for the country’s economy, people and the overall country’s future in general
Stop taking loans from IMF… for you end up selling your soul
8 key predictions from WEF for 2030
WEF deploying their candidates in various countries to support their initiatives
Eat ze bugs proteins & be happy
Eat synthetic meats & be happy
Personal carbon wallets are coming
Are you ready to trade those personal carbon credits to rich people so they don’t give a shit about the planet while you wither away in a dark hole 🤷♂️
WEF optimizing your food supply chains… what could go wrong when you smell for freshness and eat, what happens when 100s of people start smelling the produce 🤷♂️
Hey WEF — do you even know what a Ponzi scheme is or do you not care because you yourself are a Ponzi scheme
WEF thinks UBI is the Agenda, when your government provides your income they will have total control. Don’t fall for it.
Approximately 1 billion people losing jobs to AI within 10yrs. You are the collateral damage of the 4th industrial revolution.
The 4th industrial revolution
- replace animal meats with bugs
- replace cars with public transport
- replace planes with nothing
- reduce agricultural & animal farms
- chip & ID everyone + CBDC
Mottos…
- own nothing & be happy
- drive nowhere & be happy
- eat bugs & be happy
The sinister thoughts of our WEF leaders for the fourth industrial revolution
WEFs “Trusted Digital Identity Bill”
is a life by subscription basis…
Billionaires & corporations have all the power, you just live by their subscription rules, which are subject to change any time they see fit
UK under the purview of WEF goon Boris Johnson led to this 🤷♂️
Sounds like something from a WEF technocrat surveillance state playbook
Sounds very similar to a WEF goon
EU authorized edible insect foods
- House Crickets
- Yellow Mealworms
- Migratory Locusts
With WEF climate emissions policies, digital ID, CBDC, global fertilizer reduction policies, global road & air travel restrictions, global insect food drives…
They’re planning to centralize power into a few corporations and billionaires & accelerate wealth inequality further.
WEF wants the majority of y’all dead anyways… why’d you care about them
This would be nice… what do you think
WEF wants to control your food, your energy and your money. Wonder why?
WEF’s grand plans for your digital identity…
⁃Control what you can eat
⁃Control what you can spend on
⁃Control where you get medical care
⁃Control who & how you interact with
⁃Control where & how you travel
Don’t trust the WEF
Don’t trust the IMF
Don’t trust the WHO
Think for yourself, if you let them think for you, it’ll be too late to save yourself
Daring children to eat crickets in classrooms is a way to brainwash them it’s good for the environment, it’s good for your health etc.
Don’t let WEF & these insect farms to trick your children into eating 🦗
If you want me to tell you the truth, this is how you prevent the next #Plandemic
Decommission the WEF
Decommission the WHO
The 4th Industrial Revolution is going to be the combination of our physical, our digital and our biological identities.
In other words y’all will be chipped sheep taking part in their global experiments.
Say goodbye to freedoms
Hey Yuval Harari, Klaus or any of you WEF climate crisis goons volunteer 😂
How it started… How it’s going…
WEF Klaus wants your kids implanted with microchips. He wants to control entire generations of humans with #WeirdEccentricForum rules
I’d say it’s the most irrational and irresponsible decision a parent can make for their children ever
Oh, sure, because nothing says "democracy" like making sure every Tom, Dick, and undocumented Harry can waltz into a polling booth without so much as flashing a library card—after all, why bother with pesky proof when we've got all those other life essentials locked down tighter than a bank vault?
Democrats, in their infinite wisdom, apparently think that requiring ID for voting is just a sneaky Republican plot to keep the unwashed masses from exercising their sacred right to pull a lever, because heaven forbid we treat elections with the same rigor as picking up a six-pack or enrolling little Timmy in daycare.
It's not like voting could possibly influence, say, the entire country's future or anything; nope, that's totally on par with forgetting your ID at the pharmacy and having to reschedule your allergy meds pickup. How dare we impose such burdensome barriers on the one activity where fraud is about as common as a politician keeping a promise?
But wait, there's more hilarity… Democrats oppose voter ID because, gasp, it turns out getting that shiny piece of plastic can cost money, time, and a small sacrifice to the DMV gods—things that disproportionately hit poor folks, minorities, and the elderly who, coincidentally, might not vote for the party of tax cuts for billionaires.
It's almost as if these laws are less about stopping the mythical hordes of bus-riding imposters and more about engineering a voter turnout that's whiter and wealthier than a country club brunch. Who needs evidence of widespread fraud when you can just wave around memes implying hypocrisy, ignoring that voting is a constitutional right, not a privilege like boarding a plane or buying a firearm? Democrats must be cackling in their secret lairs, plotting to let everyone vote so easily that actual democracy breaks out—what a diabolical scheme!
BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ARE PROTECTING ELITE PEDOPHILES REFLECTING A DEEP SYSTEMIC ROT IN AMERICAN POLITICS
In the shadowy corridors of American power, both Democrats and Republicans have a vested interest in shielding pedophiles and suppressing explosive lists like those tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Sean "Diddy" Combs. This bipartisan complicity stems from a shared ecosystem of elite influence, where high-profile figures from both parties have been entangled in these scandals. Democrats, with connections to figures like Bill Clinton who flew on Epstein's plane multiple times, and Republicans, including ties to Donald Trump who once praised Epstein's social circle, recognize that full disclosure could unravel their mutual networks of donors, lobbyists, and power brokers. By stonewalling investigations and slow-walking document releases, they preserve a fragile truce that protects their own from accountability, ensuring that the political machine continues uninterrupted. This isn't mere oversight; it's a calculated defense of the status quo, where exposing one side's skeletons risks toppling the entire house of cards.
Beyond personal entanglements, the protection racket thrives on financial incentives that transcend party lines. Epstein's web of influence included Wall Street titans and Hollywood moguls who funneled millions into campaigns on both sides of the aisle, creating a dependency that neither Democrats nor Republicans dare disrupt. Similarly, Diddy's empire, with its deep roots in entertainment and business, has donated to politicians across the spectrum, buying silence and favors. Releasing these lists would not only implicate individuals but also expose the corrupt underbelly of campaign finance, where dark money from compromised sources props up elections. Both parties, reliant on this influx of cash to maintain their grip on power, collude in burying the truth—through sealed court documents, delayed FOIA requests, and media deflection—to safeguard their economic lifelines, proving that when it comes to self-preservation, ideology takes a back seat to greed.
Ultimately, this bipartisan cover-up reflects a deeper systemic rot in American institutions, where justice is subordinated to elite solidarity. Pedophiles like those on these lists aren't just isolated predators; they're often embedded in a class of untouchables who wield influence over lawmakers, judges, and intelligence agencies. Democrats and Republicans alike benefit from this arrangement, as it allows them to control narratives, manipulate public outrage, and divert attention to partisan battles that distract from real accountability. By protecting these lists, they perpetuate a cycle of impunity that erodes public trust and shields the powerful from the consequences ordinary citizens would face. In the end, it's not about left or right—it's about an entrenched oligarchy ensuring that the veil remains intact, lest the masses demand a reckoning that could dismantle the entire facade.
The woke mind virus represents a insidious cultural phenomenon that prioritizes ideological conformity over individual freedom and rational discourse, infecting institutions from education to media with a rigid dogma that stifles dissent and promotes division. It masquerades as empathy and justice, yet it often weaponizes identity politics to silence opposing views, labeling them as hateful or bigoted without engaging in genuine debate. This mindset erodes the foundational principles of meritocracy and personal responsibility, replacing them with a hierarchy of victimhood that rewards grievance over achievement. In schools, it confuses young minds by pushing unproven theories on gender and race as absolute truths, leading to a generation more focused on performative activism than critical thinking or resilience. Ultimately, it fragments society into echo chambers, where nuance is lost, and relationships are strained by constant scrutiny and cancellation, weakening the social fabric that once united diverse perspectives under shared values.
Far from fostering progress, the woke mind virus undermines societal stability by encouraging censorship, economic inefficiency, and a culture of perpetual outrage that drains collective energy from real problem-solving. Corporations bend to its demands, implementing diversity quotas that prioritize optics over competence, resulting in diminished innovation and trust in leadership. It fuels a moral panic that amplifies minor offenses into existential threats, distracting from pressing issues like economic inequality or global security. By pathologizing traditional norms and equating disagreement with violence, it breeds intolerance under the guise of tolerance, alienating allies and radicalizing extremes on all sides. In the long run, this virus risks collapsing the very structures of open society—free speech, scientific inquiry, and mutual respect—paving the way for authoritarianism disguised as enlightenment, where conformity is enforced not by laws, but by social shaming and exclusion.
Elon Musk has dropped a bombshell, publicly calling for the arrest of politicians involved in a massive money laundering scheme of taxpayer money through NGOs — non-governmental organizations.
Attorney General Pam Bondi must "put the hammer down" on these culprits.
In the midst of escalating urban challenges, President Trump has positioned himself as a staunch advocate for law and order, vowing to combat crime in major Democrat-led cities like Washington DC, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York. Drawing on reports of past spikes in violence, such as DC's 2023 homicide surge, Trump has proposed federal interventions, including deploying the National Guard and assuming control over local policing in DC to "make it safe again." His rhetoric emphasizes a narrative of chaos in these "sanctuary cities," claiming they are plagued by unchecked criminality under liberal policies, and he has extended threats of similar actions to other locales if crime persists. Supporters argue this approach addresses real public safety concerns, citing anecdotal evidence of carjackings, burglaries, and gang activity that have eroded quality of life, even as Trump warns that without federal oversight, these cities risk becoming unlivable.
Democrats, however, have pushed back aggressively, highlighting official statistics that show violent crime rates plummeting to multi-decade lows. In DC, for instance, authorities report a 35% drop in violent crime from 2023 to 2024, with further declines of 26% in 2025 so far, marking what they describe as the lowest levels in over 30 years. Similar trends are evident in Chicago, where crime is down 20% this year, and nationally, FBI data indicates a 4.5% reduction in violent offenses in 2024 alone. Party leaders argue these improvements stem from community-based initiatives, increased funding for mental health and youth programs, and strategic policing reforms, dismissing Trump's interventions as politically motivated overreach that undermines local governance and ignores the broader context of post-pandemic recovery.
These crime statistics are misrepresented or manipulated to bolster Democratic narratives. Incidents like the suspension of a DC police commander accused of altering data to underreport incidents and falsifying records is a prime example of this fact. Some analyses suggest shifts in reporting practices—such as reclassifying crimes or incomplete FBI submissions—could obscure the full picture, leading to claims that lethality rates remain high despite lower volumes. This debate underscores a deeper partisan divide: whether falling numbers reflect genuine progress or strategic data handling, fueling ongoing skepticism and calls for independent audits to ensure accountability in urban safety efforts.