The "Hindu Right" is a set of groups and individuals aligned on political lines. Some are practicing Hindus, and some are not. They all share allegiance to a political ideology of Hindu supremacy known as Hindutva.
Hindutva thinkers have been intolerant of many Hindu ideas from the start. The godfather of Hindutva ideology, Savarkar mocked Hindu practices, such as cow veneration as lowering the standing of humanity (get angry at him, not me; I find many of Savarkar's ideas offensive).
The Hindu Right has an entire wing devoted to religious affairs, led by the VHP / VHPA (recall -- the Hindu Right is global, their major organizations all have branches in India and abroad).
The VHP / VHPA promotes a rather specific kind of Hinduism...
The VHP / VHPA's Hinduism tends to be dominated by upper-caste practices, encourages militancy, embodies male-dominance, and isn't super keen on vama or left-handed practices (like tantra).
So, Kali, a fierce and independent goddess associated with tantra... not their favorite.
Here's a key takeaway -- The Hindu Right is intolerant of many aspects of Hindu practices.
In fact, they'll attack me for this thread merely because I acknowledge the diverse Hindu tradition *without* condemning the parts they reject.
Way back in the day, like 3,500 years ago, followers of Brahminical traditions sacrificed cows and ate beef. The Vedas--our earliest Indian texts--are quite clear on this.
Eating beef as part of religious practice continued for some time.
Then, in the first millennium CE, a new idea began to gain traction that not eating beef could be a mark of upper-caste status, especially being Brahmin. It was part of a larger set of prescriptions.
I'm writing today about the first Indian experience with European colonization -- the Portuguese Estado da India, established in 1505 and limited to a handful of cities along India's southwestern coast.
This chapter of Indian history gets going when, as the conventional narrative goes, Vasco de Gama successfully sails around Africa and arrives in Calicut in 1498.
That's true, but here's some things I think are pretty critical to add to the story --
Once the Portuguese navigated around the Cape of Good Hope, they found themselves in a world teeming with experienced Indian Ocean traders. They used this local knowledge.
Vasco de Gama even picked up a Gujarati, in what is now Kenya, to help him sail on to Calicut.
We lose a lot of things in history, and right now I am somewhat obsessed -- in a healthy, historian way -- with the takht-i firuza, or the so-called Turquoise Throne.
Here's the story --
Kapaya Nayaka, ruler of Telangana in the second quarter of the 14th century, commissioned the throne.
He originally intended it as a gift for the Tughluqs, who were in Daulatabad, trying to hold onto their relatively newly acquired landholdings in central and southern India.
But the Tughluqs couldn't hold on. Some of their own rebelled, and the rest tucked their tail between legs and ran back to Delhi.
The rebels established a new Indo-Persian dynasty in 1347: the Bahmanis, originally based in Gulbarga.
Folks, some resources for educating yourself about the basics of #caste, in history and today. A lot Indians probably don't need this... some other folks who follow me here appear to be in dire need of this education.
For your really basic, sort of statement of facts, this BBC explainer can be helpful. It doesn't connect the dots much, but it has the virtue of being succinct:
Specifically, there is added information about TekFog, an app used to manipulate social media and encrypted messaging platforms.
There are also insights gained from analyzing the anti-intellectual attacks on the Dismantling Global Hindutva conference, which came from Hindu nationalist groups in the US and India.
They tried to make it look like grassroots concern, but the data reveals the harassment.
@davidfrum Sure. In brief, Aurangzeb's name is a dog whistle to signal that it is acceptable to hate and use violence against present-day Muslims.
Here's a bit more on how it works --
@davidfrum Hindu nationalism stipulates that Muslims are the primary enemy, always.
This othering has electoral and social value for Hindu nationalists in the present. But it is hard to justify, and so Hindu nationalists demonize Muslims relentlessly, including in the past.
@davidfrum Hindu nationalist mythology stipulates, among other things, that Muslims oppressed Hindus for hundreds of years (this is historically inaccurate).
The Hindu nationalist idea, then, is that Muslims deserve to be oppressed today, as retribution for the past.