It’s undoubtedly the case more postdocs are reporting distress and poor mental health. It’s also true a lot of research in this area is very poor, with limited baseline data. It makes it very difficult to accurately provide appropriate support and interventions #AcademicTwitter
We need absolute clarity if we want to identify the needs of #PGRs and reduce any harms universities are causing or worsening. Ensuring nobody is left out or stigmatised. But so much of the current work in this field is patchy or poor. #AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter#HigherEd
As I’ve said so many times I bore myself, we’re moving from #AcademicMentalHealth being an ignored area to suddenly it being a “hot topic” people view as being publishable on. And that is bringing opportunities and major threats. We don’t discuss this enough. #AcademicTwitter
Problems in academia aren’t exempt from ethics, safety, respect, dignity and rigour. Raising concerns about how #AcademicMentalHealth is defined, approached and studied isn’t saying this topic doesn’t matter, or people aren’t suffering. #AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter#HigherEd
It scares me - and should scare you too - that some think poor studies, no ethics, plagiarism, misusing/ignoring evidence, or no confidentiality and respect are all okay because either someone ‘means well’, works/studies in academia, or has personal experience. #AcademicTwitter
Two decades ago the biggest obstruction I noted for addressing #AcademicMentalHealth was apathy and a resistance to changing toxic university practices. Those remain. But increasingly the barriers are poor research, competition, silo working, and not doing due diligence.
It’s extremely common for poor work to either over-emphasise or misdirect on core problems and solutions. Or for people to avoid any kind of basic research principles and protocols, as while they may study/work in a uni they don’t know how to operate in inclusive or ethical ways
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today’s #ResearchTip is when an unethical and alarming piece of research is identified, don’t let your scramble to be part of an exciting drama mean you amplify problems or act unethically yourself.
This 🧵 is about ways to respond to unethical publications #AcademicTwitter
There is a paper, published in a qualitative journal, that is currently raising concerns and questions about how it was published. It's grim and extreme. But it's sadly not unique. There are countless examples of unethical research out there /2 #AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter
Most of the time unethical research is stopped by good teaching and supervision (either explaining not to do it, or catching and halting it). Other places like ethics committees, participants, colleagues or reviewers can spot and prevent harm spreading /3 #AcademicTwitter
Today’s #ResearchTip is envy is sadly very common in academia and often linked to competition (which many are taught as a positive thing). Remember your candle won’t burn brighter just because you blew out someone else’s flame. #AcademicChatter#AcademicTwitter#HigherEd#MedEd
It can be difficult when everyone around you seems to be sharing successes, making progress, or not experiencing blocks and barriers. It can make you feel angry, sad, anxious or inferior. And impact negatively on working relationships or your interactions online. #AcademicChatter
Today’s #ResearchTip is your #PhD is the only time you’ll “go it alone” as a researcher (and many still work in teams for their doctoral studies). Learning to work with colleagues and communities is a great skill to acquire during your doctorate. #AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter
#PhD candidates can be misled to believe working with others is “cheating” in some way. It isn’t. It’s a great way to share ideas, expand horizons and also get or give help in areas you or others need support with. #PhDChat#PhDHelp#gradschool#HigherEd#MedEd#AcademicChatter
Future research projects, even for independent researchers, doesn’t happen in a vacuum. We need to coordinate with others to understand, progress and make an impact with our studies. Identifying and maintaining your networks is a key skill. #PhDChat#PhDHelp#gradschool#HigherEd
A reminder if you're a psychologist or healthcare worker directly involved in supporting a family you cannot breach confidentiality and discuss their treatment with the media or on social media. And if you are not directly involved you cannot speak publicly as if you know them.
The first is unethical because publicly discussing anyone's personal mental or physical healthcare you've directly been involved with is a risk to them and other patients. The second is just gossip, you're using your occupation to imply special insights you do not have.
You can talk around issues, discussing how healthcare works, what support others affected by issues might need (and where to access it), or the diverse ways we all may cope with situations - all without mentioning specific cases/individuals. It can be reassuring and helpful.
Today's #ResearchTip is if you want to share your work and promote yourself - go where the people you want to reach are!
That might be here, ORCID, ResearchGate, on Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, your uni's website, or a personal profile #AcademicTwitter#AcademicChatter#HigherEd
There's often a recommendation to get a personal website. That can be useful as your career builds. However I'd recommend an ORCID profile first and foremost. If you get a website you need to send people to it, which can be a job in itself! Have a plan for that #AcademicChatter
You can use different platforms for different purposes. ORCID plus Scholar or ResearchGate for your publications. Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn for networking and help seeking. TikTok or Insta for public engagement and cat photos. There are lots of choices #AcademicChatter
When Viagra launched it was limited to a specific group of men - typically older, with pre-existing physical health conditions that caused erectile difficulties. But right from the outset, confusion was rife, sadly fuelled by some areas of pharma, private medicine and media.
It was billed as a wonder drug. It could restore relationships! It was an aphrodisiac! It made men into better lovers! It enhanced penis size! It was the biggest medical revolution ever!
It was none of those things. But the discourse did not stop. Especially in men's media.