3/ Redundant economics:
Labour's "plan" is to double down on the trickle-down economics that led us into this mess, offsetting the cost of their plan to end the overcharging of people on pre-pay meters by giving the already profit-swollen companies even more cash. #EnoughIsEnough
4/ Rewarding bad practice:
Part of the issue is essentially "price fixing" by the big 6, so this feels like a reward for bad practice rather than any kind of meaningful fix. Worse, it's based on the false Thatcherite notion that there's "no alternative" to this broken model.
5/ Avoiding renationalisation
Renationalisation is - far from being too expensive - actually very cost effective and would, deliver big savings to ordinary people. This has been explained by many sources & is clearly expressed in the pictured report from 2016: #EnoughIsEnough
6/ Affordability and efficiency:
"There is a widespread beliefthat the private suppliers take excessive profits out of the system through the payment of dividends
to shareholders and interest payments to creditors, by charging higher prices than necessary"
7/ Lower cost of capital:
"A report by Corporate Watch in 2015
calculated that the annual savings from bringing the energy, water & rail sectors into public ownership
could be £6.5 billion – equivalent to £248 each year for every household in the UK" #EnoughIsEnough#energybills
8/ Lower prices from natural monopolies:
"Publicly owned companies need not maximise profits, and so the incentive to over-charge and
confuse customers is removed... Public ownership of such networks removes the commercial incentive to abuse such monopolies."
9/ Democratisation:
"The simple advantage of public ownership of the energy system is that it enables democratic control
and public planning of a system providing an extremely important public good." #EnoughIsEnough#EnergyCrisis#energybills
10/10 Conclusion:
The economics of renationalising the utilities are all positive & shld incentivise politicians to do it. By contrast, there's no good argument for @labour's new policy of rewarding failure to divert attention from the real solutions to the #EnergyCrisis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Thread on a self imposed predicament faced by the establishment, which consists of 2 main problems:
A) #Johnson
B) #littlekeir
2/ Faced with the possibility of a @jeremycorbyn led Government, the establishment turned to explicitly incompetent and corrupt but reliably populist #Johnson as the one man who could stop #Corbyn. The reasoning was probably this: However bad #Johnson would turn out...
3/ Wouldn't matter all that much because with @jeremycorbyn ousted, the system could go back to normal, with a "competent", if dull, Blairite Labour leader ready to step into the breach with a capitalist B-team should #Johnson prove too embarrassing. #littlekeir seemed perfect.
1/ Still not convinced this is going to happen. The Tories are allegedly planning for GE in August next year (& they may well have been assured of this). This will give the SNP more excuses for delay. Even if the ref still takes place in October 2023 after an August GE...
2/The mandatory General Election will then be circa 2027. By this point Sturgeon will probably have stepped down and the promise of independence will no longer her "problem" to manage. Rather than as move towards independence...
3/... this perhaps yet another sign that an early General Election is in play. Others include Crosby attending cabinet and Right Wing Labour MPs laying the groundwork for leadership campaigns. Apologies for the scepticism but past behaviour is best guide to future action...
1/The sudden support for trade unionism by the Labour right (yes, @PeoplesMomentum, that includes Rayner) tells us 3 things:
Firstly #littlekeir#Starmer has failed. His purpose was: destroy the Labour left (basically accomplished) while safeguarding the party as a vehicle for...
2/... Right wing Liberals (failed). For the second to work, the right would have to deligitimise Corbynism by providing that Blairite Labour could win elections, framing this as the only way forward.
3/ a Blarite Labour on course for election victory, need not worry about unions because they would be doing well enough out of private donors buying in influence. And this brings us to the second point: Labour is going to lose the next election & frontbenchers know it.
1/ Astute analysis by the @NewStatesman's @harrytlambert (doesn't mean he's on our side), which identifies that the #Rwanda flight as a key play in the Tory culture war, designed to draw election battle lines. There is an obvious strategy for dealing this: take it head on.
2/ If many UK citizens don't like the reality that people are being smuggled to our shores, an astute left wing politician would simply draw their eyes to the root cause: western wars started to expand markets for goods, services and weaponry to be traded in the US dollar.
3/ A good portion of the 70million refugees in the world today (many of whom are internally displaced) have been forced to leave by the destruction of their nations by the Anglo Saxon Empire: Yemen, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and more. This is not a conversation the Tories want.
1/ It's very easy to dismiss this chart, allegedly by Paul Mason as nonsense. Much of the content, such as the implication that @STWuk's @JohnWRees is somehow influenced by China is bizarre. However...
2/... structure of the chart itself resembles the strategic/conspiratorial thinking of the British security services, as outlined by once infamous anti-Soviet spy Sidney Reilley, in his memoirs: pbs.twimg.com/media/FUtce1oX…
3/ Outlining how his networks in the Soviet Union operated, Sidney explained:
"It was essential that my Russian Organisation should not know too much and that no part of it should be in a position to betray another." ...
1/ There is a bit of an issue with the British left, in that it assumes that the Empire and its institutions are somehow compatible with socialism. In reality, the reason we have lost the #NHS IS the Empire, including NATO, the Royal Family, flag waving, etc.
2/ For instance, the empire is underpinned by international finance which facilitates money laundering across borders for arms deals via the city of London, a system protected by the Royal Family...
3/ ...which has investments in tax havens and can block any legislation that directly impacts upon its interests before it reaches parliament. dumptheguardian.com/uk-news/2021/f…