2/ Acc. to this hist, key contexts for #Wesleyan’s AAUP:
-- a rich lib arts college into #highered “experimentation”
-- a “Little Uni” w/ PhD progs in sciences
-- square circle: low tenure density & high contingency
-- longstanding Junior Faculty Org (JFO) addressed contradiction
3/ @WesleyanAAUP hist notes contradictions in 1915-17 statements of @AAUP prez John #Dewey & co-found Arthur Lovejoy:
profs + trusteees collab on everything to do w/ education (curriculum to budget to donations);
admin there to "implement".
Nonetheless: profs salaried employees.
4/ Know your #academic#LaborHistory
In 1913 Wesleyan Prez Shanklin fired econ prof. Willard Fisher for publicly suggesting (off campus) churches close Sundays permit other outlets for religious impulse.
This "extramural" free speech galvanized @AAUP on Academic Freedom & Tenure
6/ The @WesleyanAAUP history next turns to local organizing of professors at Wes from 1920s-60s.
This builds to an account of Prez Victor Butterfield's education innovations
(marked by creating "colleges" w/in lib arts college)
coming at the expense of a tenured professoriate.
7/ @WesleyanAAUP account of this period explicitly connects this history as a trajectory continued into the present where it reports that
"a third of all #Wesleyan faculty in 2022
are explicitly excluded from eligibility for tenure,
no matter the length of their employment."
8/ From this same period, the @WesleyanAAUP history connects local work by Wesleyan professors on #AcademicFreedom during the McCarthy era to the @AAUP presidency of Wes prof. Fred B. Millett in 1952-3, bemoaning "wave of suppression that has swept over this free land of ours."
9/ A riveting section, "Reforming the 'Homogenized University'" @WesleyanAAUP recounts junior faculty work to address Wesleyan's then-present discriminatory hiring.
In 1960s Junior fac gained representation in hiring & promotion decisions, normalized criteria for promotion.
10/ In this same section, the @WesleyanAAUP history includes a quote from famous English prof. Richard Ohmann echoing a typical #Wesleyan sentiment:
"Reforms" were about calling the university to uphold its own professed values.
(on Prof. Ohmann, see: politico.com/news/magazine/…)
11/ Concluding section of @WesleyanAAUP history is 8pp outlining efforts to organize faculty to negotiate collectively for fair compensation in eras (70s-90s) of institutional & national economic downturns.
Key issue: faculty input on university budget and salary structures.
12/ A highlight of this era is the effective establishing between Pres. Campbell and the (then) re-newed Wes @AAUP chapter on terms of discussion on compensation.
Essential was agreement about the sharing of information, and adequate time for all parties.
13/ Into the 80s the renewed Wesleyan AAUP chapter fizzled to a "discussion group" and its work on collective bargaining was handed over to a new standing faculty committee:
"Compensation and Benefits Committee" ...which lacks the negotiation conditions of the 1970s.
14/ The @WesleyanAAUP chapter history concludes its account with a call for simple changes / restitutions in the building of trust:
--fixed rules
--open communication
--timely sharing of all relevant data
15/ Lessons @WesleyanAAUP chapter history draws are at the top of this thread.
To wit:
While Wesleyan faculty and the @AAUP have had a long relationship most campus work on labor led by unprotected Junior faculty #solidarity organizing & sharing information.
Happy #LaborDay
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What do we teach when we teach "Medieval Europe"?
Do we teach Europe to set up Historical #Comparison?
OR to teach a Global (or, Alex West @siwaratrikalpa's much more coherent Hemispheric) #MiddleAges?
Here's how I see the two options...
(obvs others, I'm a Byzantinist after all)
My students discuss CWickham's intro in
Medieval Europe (2016; Review: I like the book)
CW argues for "Medieval Europe" as artificial category with value in setting up historical #comparison.
There's a cleverness to that.
But here's my problem, as explained to my students...
There is no comparison.
Practically speaking.
To do a comparison, you don't need to just find a region with some big similar stats (geog, pop, resources), you need to find something similarly studied, with comparable bibliographies.
MAYBE, in not too long, "Medieval China"?
Arguing that 1) legal case is settled that #ExecutiveBranch has right to forgive student debt. 2) need is urgent: 89% of debtors will be in financial insecurity if required payments resume.
@SenWarren makes the point that $50k forgiven would release 36m citizens completely from debt.
A little #ByzantineHistory and #DH thread.
One project this semester is returning to data & visuals students & I pulled from chronicle of Theophanes.
Potentially can show a lot.
My interest: how ninth-century Constantinople saw the space of #Roman history.
Images all Jesse Simmons (superstar Res Assistant!).
This shows all cities/settlements in Chronicle of Theophanes.
One obvious thing (expected): East/West discrepancy.
One obvious thing (p'haps NOT expected): interest in Syria/Palestine over Greece!
We made the data sensitive to *when* (under what date) a city/settlement is mentioned.
Differentiates the "space" of different eras or emperors' reigns in the Chronicle.
Blue is "space" of Constantine's Rome (ca. 310-35)
Yellow is "space" of Irene & Nikephoros (ca. 780-810).