Janis Kluge Profile picture
Sep 10 14 tweets 4 min read
1/ On the #oil price cap: After listening to this excellent Brookings discussion, I am more optimistic it could work, but I also believe it may need to be postponed by 8-12 weeks. Here is why...
2/ First on the cost of delaying #sanctions: The sooner, the more, the better. But this is just a small delay, and the goal - depriving Russia of FX and budget revenues - is a multi-year goal that will be gradually achieved, because Russia still has considerable buffers in both.
3/ The key question is of course Russia's reaction: Russia could reduce its exports, causing oil market prices to rise. From Russia's perspective, compliance would show weakness. Russia has shown it can reduce some production in 2020, and it is willing to bear costs (eg: gas...).
4/ There are also risks for Russia: Using the gas weapon is already costly to Russia itself, and adding the "oil weapon" could backfire, in a very difficult economic situation. Non-sanctioning countries would also suffer from Russia's cut (India), but may blame it on the West.
5/ Russia could still sell cheap oil to China via pipeline to keep Xi happy if it chooses to cut oil supply. But Moscow also needs to consider that its partners in OPEC+ may not be a fan of huge market disruption, even if it increases their own revenue in the short term.
6/ The timing in early winter is not great for the West. For the EU it could increase energy costs even more, at a time when gas uncertainty is still high and some parts of the population are unhappy. In addition to that, strategic oil reserves are relatively low right now.
7/ If Russia refuses to export under the cap, these reserves may be needed to stabilize the market. It is probably politically difficult to rebuild them before the US midterm elections, so some time is needed afterwards to prepare for a possible standoff with Russia.
8/ What are the options: Essentially, the oil price cap is not an additional restriction, but an exception to a measure the EU has already decided on in June (banning EU companies from offering maritime services to Russian oil shipments starting Dec. 6th).
9/ Many currently believe that this measure cannot come into effect without such an exception, as it would shut in too much Russian oil, causing the oil price to skyrocket. So a revision to the EU's 6th sanction package is probably necessary either way. ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
10/ Postponing the measure and adding an oil price cap until, e.g., March 1st, would significantly reduce the risks for the West and give it more time to prepare. The downside: It also gives Russia more time to prepare. But there is not that much Russia can do as preparation.
11/ Russia is vulnerable because it will need to export 85% of its oil via ship and neither Russia, nor its non-sanctioning customers have enough ships to do that. It is unlikely that Western firms will go along with Russian circumvention schemes, risk/reward will not work out.
12/ An alternative to postpoining the cap until March is introducing it, but starting with a non-binding (high) cap. This makes Russia retaliation a bit less likely and gives the West time to test its tool. Then, the screws could be tightened in spring.
13/ I believe the oil price cap is very promising. I have the impression it is not just a "wild idea", but is thought out carefully. It could be a great solution for the next ~3-5 years, even if it is "leaky", i.e. if Russia finds ways to circumvent it partially.
14/14 In the long run, if Russia continues its war on Ukraine, the goal should still be Iran-style sanctions on Russian oil, i.e. minimizing export volumes as much as possible through secondary sanctions on buyers. But that needs huge alternative supply, which takes time to grow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Janis Kluge

Janis Kluge Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jakluge

Sep 11
1/ #Sanctions are hitting #Russia's economy in many ways, but two goals are key:
1.) Diminish Putin's ability to redistribute rubles within Russia (depends mostly on #budget).
2.) Diminish Russia's ability to #import (depends on availability of foreign exchange AND restrictions).
2/ It all boils down to these two things. If the budget is doing fine and imports are doing fine, then the regime can compensate for any sanctions damage with transfers. If there is problem with either one, the government faces difficult foreign/domestic policy tradeoffs.
3/ The budget and the ability to import are the "transmission belts" through which economic effecs of #sanctions become political. The budget is the pie that Putin can share among military/elites/population. The imports are decisive for the size of the pie and how tasty it is.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 8
1/ #Russia's Finance Ministry stopped publishing detailed data #budget spending in April. But with a few calculations, it's possible to get a pretty good picture of what's going on. Due to the war, #defense spending until July was at least ~1.2tn RUB (~20bn USD) higher than 2021.
2/ This also means that defense spending until July was >1tn higher than planned. Of course this does not account for changes in Russia's stocks of weapons and ammunition. Refilling those will be much more expensive, but it was not yet visible in the budget until July 2022.
3/ Here is how defense spending can be calculated: Russia does not publish detailed monthly spending data, but they still publish a current snapshot on ongoing spending on "budget.gov.ru". The data here is incomplete, a huge chunk is missing.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 3
1/ Is #Russia flaring gas on a massive scale? Here is another approach to solving that question: Natural gas and gas condensate production should normally go hand in hand. Here is a dot plot of Russian monthly production of gas and gas condensate (unstabilized) until April 22.
2/ The correlation is strong, as expected (r=0.85). My assumption is that gas condensate doesn't have to be flared, because it is easier to store than natural gas. Thus, if #Gazprom is reducing its production by flaring the correlation should break down.
3/ If #Gazprom is reducing its production by shutting down wells, the correlation should rather remain intact (less condensate production). Gazprom's natural gas production started falling dramatically in April.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 1
1/ Most economic indicators in #Russia's monthly statistics have stabilized. One exception: The crash in wholesale turnover seems to be continuing unabated. Wholesale turnover has fallen by 25.4% year over year! What's happening? Spoiler: It's Putin's gas blackmail backfiring. 1/
2/ Rosstat hasn't published the individual components of wholesale turnover in absolute terms (at least I couldn't find it), but it is possible to calculate them based on the relative weight of different sectors, which Rosstat publishes.
3/ Here is the resulting wholesale turnover (in current prices). There are some seasonal changes (not important here). Important is the general role that different sectors play. Wholesale turnover is dominated by raw materials, more precisely: energy trade.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 30
1/ Explainer: Why the timing of a crisis has a critical impact on annual GDP figures. Annual GDP depends very much on one thing: In which quarter did the crisis start? These are 4 _identical_ economic crises with subsequent recovery. They start 3 months apart.
2/ Now let's look at the result change in annual GDP in the first 3 calendar years of these hypothetical crises: The difference that a 3-month delay makes!
#Russia's current crisis started in Q2 (~red). If Russia had started its war 3 months earlier, we would be looking at ~blue.
3/ The drop in Russian GDP during the Global Financial Crisis fit neatly into the year 2009, resulting in a 7.8% contraction, with growth in 2008 and 2010. It is just this _coincidence_ that makes 2009 look so harsh, and 2022 look rather benign.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 26
1/ Is #Gazprom flaring on a massive scale? I am reopening the case! The flare near #Finland is huge, but it can only burn ~1% of the missing delivieres. BUT: What if there are more? Quite possibly, Gazprom's declining production numbers are actually a _result_ of flaring.
2/ In recent weeks, NASA FIRMS was sometimes used to assess the intensity of artillery in Ukraine. It can also be used to detect flaring. The big flame near Finland appeared for the first time on June 17th. Since then the satellite shows it clearly. firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/#t:adv;d:2…
3/ I checked some places near Novy Urengoy, famous for its gas production. And the first installation I looked at was an immediate hit: It was this flare stack in the East of Novy Urengoy. I went through the last years, and there was only a little activity in late '20/early '21.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(