#SupremeCourt to hear a batch of petitions today challenging the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. Over 200 petitions up for consideration #CAA
Matter adjourned to next Monday at the request of Senior Advocates AM Singhvi and Mukul Rohatgi #CAA
Matter now taken up since Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal is appearing.
Sibal: There are two sets of matters, and they have to be segregated: Sibal
Adv: Assam and North east matter were segregated, there the union has said that they have to file separate counter for Assam, Tripura
SC after adv Manohar Lal Sharma argues: Don't repeat the arguments.
Sharma (appearing virtually): I won't waste this court's time my lords.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: These have been hanging fire for a long time, now they should be heard after segregation.
SC: Should it be heard by 3 judges? Please work out the lead matter in the separate questions.
Adv: All Assam Students Union Plea can be the lead Petition for the north east batch.
SG: Issue is she is aware of her plea, but i have to collect over 200.
SC: You have to work out.
SG: There are constitution benches determining the questions for Delhi and Maharashtra. Preparation time is required.
Order: This entire batch of matters essentially challenged certain Amendments to 1955 Citizenship Act. However, as projected by various ld counsel, the matters need to be put in diff compartments so the submissions can be confined to those segments. Our attention has been ...
Order: invited to order in terms of which Assam and Northeast matters were to be segregated. In terms of the same, and to have clarity in the matter, we direct that:
A) SG shall prepare complete list of matters pertaining to these challenges.
B) Matters shall then be out into different complements with regard to the challenges.
C) The govt of India shall thereafter file its responses in 4 weeks.
D) The lead matters shall thereafter...
Order: be demarcated and convenience Compilations be prepared after consulting counsel and shared with all parties digitally. This part of exercises be completed after 2 weeks of the Union's responses.
List for directions on October 31.
Sibal: Let notices be issued where not.
Order: Let notice be issued in fresh matters where not issued.
SG: Segment wise copies will be circulated.
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: Notice been issued in Assam matter but they have returned plea. Please ask standing counsel to ...
Order: States of Assam and Tripura to also file its responses to each Petition in 4 weeks.
Counsel mentions civil suits in matter.
SC: is it on board?
Order: Mr Joydeep Gupta, Sr Adv, has filed a civil suit with similar prayers. That to also be listed with these matters along with all other pending connected matters.
SG: Please tell counsel to give my office a copy as well.
Jaising: Please tell Assam to accept our notice.
Sharma: Please make mine the last matter.
Sibal: He'll argue something v diff that's why.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Previously, the court deferred the hearing of an application of an intervenor in the case who had claimed ownership of the property where the monument is located
Supreme Court Constitution Bench led by CJI UU Lalit begins hearing pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the 10% quota for the economically weaker sections (EWS) #SupremeCourt#EWS
CJI Lalit informed that AG KK Venugopal is on his way to court
CJI: We have not seen him in court for long. We are indebted. #EWS
- Whether the 103rd Constitution Amendment can be said to breach the basic structure of the Constitution by permitting the State to make special provisions, including reservation, based on economic criteria?
Varanasi District Judge to deliver judgment today on whether the court should continue hearing a case filed by five Hindu women seeking the right to worship inside #Gyanvapi mosque, located next to #KashiVishwanath temple or the case fails as per Muslim party's argument
CJI UU Lalit: there is a revenue aspect to it and if something is done in some cases you will block their revenue. this revenue is used for social causes. this plea is like directing Govt to have a policy, it is not our domain. #supremecourt
CJI: If you are citing to the reports it shows Centre is alive to the problem. These kind of matters you entertain but it goes another way. You can do what you want. we will not touch this matter #supremecourt