1/🧵 Warning!⚠️
This Sept/19/22 CTIF Research seminar:“The Eighth Wave-Challenges & Predictions for an Uncertain Future,” contains GBD terminology & questionable advice from 1 panelist which would just be outrageous if it wasn’t so dangerous. Guess who⬇️
2/ Yep, Mel Krajden.
And pls remember while reading that the CITF’s mandate is to “catalyze, support, fund & harmonize knowledge on SARS-COV-2 immunity for..decision-makers to inform their efforts to protect Cdns & minimize the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.”#bcpoli#canpoli
3/ Krajden’s presentation (50min mark)re:challenges of other seasonal viruses, starts w/:
“It’s time to return to normalcy for our traumatized population…”
“Focusing on Covid morbidity/mortality is bad b/c…to protect older Cdns has come at high cost to our youth” (sorry, olds)
4/ And continues with:
“As a result of Covid control measures, the normal seasonal activity of influenza, RSV & other viruses h/b perturbed.” (Interesting choice of words, eh?)
“Human existence in microbial free bubbles creates other unknown risks” (um, unknown?)
5/ And:
“We have had an extraordinary large SARS-COV-2 wave over the summer!” (But we did nothing to protect you!)
“This wave has created massive levels of hybrid immunity..”(AKA unprecedented/unmitigated infections…oh well, vaccines! sorry #LongCovid is Mr. Snuffleupagus)
6/ And:
“Use caution (i.e masks)…“tools combined w/broader health measures like lockdowns or curfews …work...” but come “at a price!” (Hey, who wants lockdowns!)
And in ambiguous conclusion: “Rational plans are needed…incl surveillance & other preventive measures” #bcpoli
7/ Now that concludes the presentation portion, but I daresay there’s more in the Q & A session.
The 1st of 2 questions posed to Krajden (w/eyebrow raising answers): “What can be expected of physicians in the HC system in the 8th wave?” (59min/30s mark)
8/ After long preamble re:immense challenges physicians will face due to fact their HC workforce w/b sick too, he segued:
“What’s clear is that many kids who get infected in school often aren’t infected in school they are infected in their communities…”
Yep, he said that! #bced
9/ 2nd q (1hr25min mark) “From what we’ve learned from Covid mgmt, do you think we’re doing enough for other respiratory viruses, influenza esp…to lower mortality?”
“The lessons learned…is health measures..to protect against Covid…eliminated influenza, so they work..BUT…”
10/ “challenge is to balance risks…so you want to balance out measures you use…we can be quite draconian but you affect many components of society…so we need to be very strategic..respiratory viruses are endemic so not easy to protect against (but influenza was eliminated!)
11/ con’t..”and part of the natural cycle of life is to be exposed to them and develop an immune response…when they are severe we develop vaccines to negate severity of disease, so eventually…” AND that’s when his phone rang (probably Bonnie saying watch out for Twitter!)
12/ Anyway, there’s good presentations too (i.e Sally Otto), but mask q answered by 2 panelists that are all in on “individual choices.”
Also, this is evidence-based seminar rooted in CITF research conclusions from 119 Cdn studies. What research evidence is Mel Krajden citing?
13/ I'm putting this on record b/c: 1) Krajden has & continues to have influence over national research initiatives & health policy in his CITF Leadership role, among others. 2) It's unconscionable.
My transcript w/his full answers to questions above: docs.google.com/document/d/1Vt…
14/ Here's more on Mel Krajden's various positions in the PHAC Covid-19 Immunity Task Force & the potential influence he has had & continues to have on BC's Covid19 research & public health policies over these last 3 years.
1/🧵So, how widespread is the national support of BC’s population studies? Or perhaps a better question is who in BC’s research field has most influence & clout at national level? Well, there’s 1 name on top of that list & that’s Mel Krajden - 1 of BC’s most prolific co-authors.
2/ A brief recap ...
On Mar1st/21, when #DrHenry announced that BC was extending intervals from 3-16 wks, Chief Science Advisor, Mona Nemer, said it basically amounted to “a population level experiment” & “that proper clinical trials” s/b conducted 1st. cbc.ca/news/politics/…
3/ On Mar2/21, Dr.Henry called the stmt “an unfortunate comment", saying that Nemer “was not involved in the evaluation that led B.C. to make a decision tailored to its current case level.” She doubled down & insisted it was based on science & data.#bcpolicbc.ca/news/canada/br…
1/🧵 Hello @KasariGovender? How is this just or equitable? This is the diabolical result of “personal choice” AKA “focused protection.” @CDCofBC: “People w/certain health conditions may choose to isolate completely during pandemic - a practice called protective self-separation.”
2/ con’t “This is personal choice... Staying home & not seeing people can make you feel lonely & isolated. You’ll need to consider your mental & emotional health if you decide to practice protective self-separation & think about ways to stay connected…”bccdc.ca/health-info/di…
3/ So basically, according to @CDCofBC if you have health conditions, you better steer clear of Covid b/c even your gov’t confirms that you’re at risk for severe outcome. But you’re completely on your own while majority of BC public will be living it up like it’s 2019! #bcpoli
1/ @JM_Whiteside@adriandix pls explain why you're not using every tool in the toolbox to protect #bced students/staff/fam & public when even your own govt branches-@CDCofBC@PHSAofBC-are chalk full of online resources re: risks & devastating effects of #LongCovid#LongCovidKids
2/ Specifically, as per the @CDCofBC "COVID-19 Illness in Children" page (updated Jan/22)
"If your child still feels sick weeks or months after having COVID-19, it’s called Post-COVID-19 condition or “long COVID”. It may affect both children & adults." bccdc.ca/health-info/di…
3/ Also, re: above is @PHAC info, a "Welcome to #LongCovid" lntro video & harsh dose of reality look behind BCPH "back to normalcy" PR curtain w/@PHSAofBC link including real risks of life altering effects that can occur even after "mild" acute illness: phsa.ca/our-services/p…
1/ So, remember BC studies w/waived ethics co-authored by #DrHenry? Well, I looked into BCPH Act re:Emerg Powers & to summarize: #DrHenry still believes #COVID19 is significant risk as "infectious/hazardous agent" w/serious PH impact but she wants you to forget all that.#bcpoli
2/ Let me explain. So, as per the PH Act, Part 5-Emerg Powers, sec 53: “During an emerg, this Part applies despite any provision of this or any other enactment, incl "the collection, use or disclosure of personal info..." #bcpolibclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document…
3/ This above section may just provides a convenient cherry-picking opportunity to justify no participant consent in these studies, but in order for this section to apply, there must be a BCPH Emergency declared, stipulating serious risk to PH. #bcpoli
1/🧵So, who's ready to explore some "made in BC" ethics waivers w/me? Six studies w/similar stmts & one document that might just be a crucial puzzle piece. btw-this thread & corresponding paper is culmination of weeks of my intermittent research...okay, here. it. goes...#bcpoli
2/ Before getting into it, lets look at the waiver stmts w/each corresponding study. The 1st five are all co-authored by #DrHenry incl. 4 vax studies & the P.1 study. The 6th is a WGS project that took place during the P1 outbreak & the Delta wave. They are as follows: #bcpoli
3/ #1 Vax study stmt: "Data linkages & analyses were conducted under a surveillance mandate, authorized by the PHO under the Public Health Act, and exempt from research ethics board review.”#bcpolincbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…