#ICUchecklist is to make sure the plane doesn’t crash, not to assure the stewardesses don’t run out of Diet Coke on the way to Los Angeles. If the checklist gets too long, it becomes pro forma, and is rattled off without attention. The picture shows a cumbersome #checklist
It seems to imply that the individual patient and their disease process does not matter, you simply have to check some boxes like you were starting a plane or baking some cookies. It seems also to imply that we will forget to monitor medications and labs and…everything
Much of what is there is based on flimsy, dated, or no evidence (GI PPX) and will hardly lead to a plane crash if ignored for a day - the NNH is huge. Few patients are harmed by a day or two “delay” in starting enteral nutrition - there is scant evidence of harm. So, why do we…
…mention it on the checklist day after day? It should be part of the presentation and if so we don’t need to repeat ourselves on the #checklist. Same with #codestatus - default is #fullcode for a reason & that’s what’s gonna happen if we fail to have the obvious discussion…
And the more dire the situation and the more urgent to “clarify” it, the more obvious it is and the less I need a checklist to remind me. I don’t want to hear “full code” as the last thing on an inane and mindless checklist as the capstone of every presentation
There are some things that are important enough - because the consequences of omission or delay are severe enough - that deserve to be on a checklist but they are few: SAT/SBT, DVT PPX, remove lines/tubes, a few others.
But there is no free lunch: every moment spent prattling about fatuous routines is a moment not spent on higher priorities; it reinforces a cookbook mentality; and encourages mindless rote rattling off of a list in a perfunctory way w/o earnestly engaging with the patients
“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” - Emerson
For context I spent 2 weeks in 2005 rounding with Pete Pronovost at the height of enthusiasm for checklists & later that year instituted a checklist at Ohio State MICU. I watched it become bloated with everybody’s pet topic (CAM-ICU was one that really rankled me cuz: so what?)…
I went around policing use of the “green sheets” as we called them (they were printed on green paper), so this thread is not some glib wayward stream of consciousness it is a reflection of 17 years experience using checklists in the ICU
I have seen a mindless repetition of items on the “checklist” cut and pasted from former notes that gets things wrong yet everybody stands there nodding their head ready to move on to the next patient - the unintended and unfortunate consequence of bloated mindless checklists
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In this article, we showed that physicians estimated the probability of two events both occurring as *more* likely than one or both of the individual events. This is logically impossible and consistent with the #conjunctionfallacy. This #bias can lead to catastrophic outcomes
The impetus for the study was an #OBGYN catastrophe that resulted, in part, from this bias. A woman presented in labor w brow presentation. For successful vaginal delivery, 2 events must happen: reversion to deliverable position, and vaginal delivery w/o #caesareansection
PSA: You *CANNOT* use a "bougie" or Eschmann Intubating Stylet to do an endotracheal tube exchange. I have seen this mistake twice in the past 6 months. You will lose the airway. A simple look at the length of the bougie and an #ETT will make this clear.
The length of an adult ETT is about 32 cm and the length of the #eschmannstylete is 70 cm. This leaves no room in the center for you to grab it. When you retract the #ETT to the end of the stylet, its distal tip is still in the patient's mouth & entire stylet is covered
To do a tube exchange, you need 2x the length of the ETT and then some additional length to work with, else you risk retracting the exchange device too far and losing the airway. This is why they make an "airway exchange catheter" and its length is 83cm: cookmedical.com/products/cc_ca…
Write this down: “The purpose of daily rounds & presentation (& progress note) is to *document the behavior of the disease under observation and treatment*.” This is the paramount philosophical purpose. You can include superfluous and redundant boilerplate (eg RRR no MGR no CCE)
But your presentation MUST contain all the data from the patient/exam/labs etc which allow an assessment (explicit or intuitive) of whether the patient is getting better or worse or not progressing, whether the expected is happening or not, & whether there r unexpected findings
Ideally, these rspecific to the pt & the disease rather than routine claptrap; if your patient has #complicatedPPE, the output of the chest tube will have a central position in the presentation; if it’s asthma, wheezing, RR, acc mm use. Tailor ur assessment to the disease….
This 30ish woman of mean height has a recurrent right spontaneous #PTX 18 months after the first. She has a history of thoracic pain receiving spinal steroid injections; o/w healthy. The best way to get the #diagnosis is (poll next)
#pleuraldisease is fascinating and nuanced. First step is #lightscriteria which give favor to finding #exudates which tend to be more urgent. You only need one criterion, which maximizes #sensitivity. Meaningless statement: "It's an exudate only by protein." One criterion=exudate
(Like on Tinder, the more criteria you require, the more you narrow your pool, compromising sensitivity for specificity.) Transudates I will skip over. Most common #exudate is #parapneumoniceffusion#PPE. If there is or is likely to be #pneumonia, it's PPE. Next task is to...
“Research finds that the best people at making predictions (did you know that there are prediction tournaments?) aren’t those who are smartest but rather those who weigh evidence dispassionately and are willing to change their minds.” #cromwellsrulenytimes.com/2021/03/03/opi…
“Likewise, math whizzes excel at interpreting data — but only so long as the topic is banal, like skin rashes. A study found that when the topic was a hot one they cared about, like gun policy, they blundered. Passion swamped expertise.”
“There are a number of biases in play, including the “I’m not biased” bias. That’s when we believe we’re more objective than others, and it particularly traps intelligent people.”