@kprather88 I can share what I've been told so often over the years about why =>N95/FFP2 respirators/masks😷& filters may not "significantly" reduce⬇️ #AirPollution health risk. Some= valid points to consider:
1- health effects of varying concentrations of PM2.5 exposures aren't linear.
1/
@kprather88 cont...
2- they share poorly-designed studies in which too little filter surface area/efficiency/air flow rate is installed to provide enough cycles (i.e., air changes) per hour through filters for the space. When this is pointed out, they reply "solutions must be affordable" 2/
@kprather88 cont...
When one highlights that affordability, while very valid, answers & takes us toward a policy question rather than simply answering "do filters work" to reduce exposure of occupants to outdoor/indoor #AirPollution, they continue to conflate the #IndoorAirQuality science 3/
@kprather88 Physicists/engineers/#IndoorAirQuality experts agree that the solution to #AirPollution requires us to adopt #healthy/#sustainable methods to stop pollution at the source. But, protection/prevention is a large part of what we can do to⬇️contagion/allergen health risks indoors. 4/
@kprather88 Filters & masks unquestionably reduce our risk to contagions, allergens, & #AirPollution. We can argue about how much the risk is reduced depending on the concentrations & a number of factors.
But, to say filters "dont work" or RCTs are required to prove they do is foolish. 5/
@kprather88 Examples I often use are:
a-Would they claim that pedestrian crossings (painted 'zebra stripes') engineered for urban roadways "dont work" or require randomized controlled trials in order to "prove they work"?
There'll always be uncertainty in quantifying preventive risk⬇️. 6/
@kprather88 b-Would they claim that fish aquarium pump/filter systems "dont work" based upon data from randomized controlled trials or prospective studies that install a smaller pump/filter designed for a 20-liter aquarium in a 100-liter volume aquarium? 7/
@kprather88 #indoorairquality experts find building owners wondering why the #indoorairquality is unhealthy when they have contracted for & installed an air delivery & filter (HVAC) system that is not 'fit for purpose' or is unable to cycle enough air through filters/UV/outdoor exchange. 8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Smith on Air Pollution

Jeff Smith on Air Pollution Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jksmith34

Oct 30, 2020
@WHO highlights how important #Ventilation is for #HealthyBuildings in order to help reduce the risk of indoor transmission of #COVID19! "This has to be one intervention part of a package of interventions to prevent" #SARSCoV2 transmission. @j_g_allen
"In settings like schools or working places ...what we are recommending is to increase the rate of air change; increase the rate of ventilation by natural ways or mechanical ones, always trying to avoid the recirculation of the air." 2/
@ShellyMBoulder @linseymarr @CorsIAQ
"Essentially what we know is to renew the air... if in 1 hour you renew, you change your air six times, I think that will provide quite a sensible way of making sure that we are reducing or preventing the spread of the virus indoors." 3/ #Ventilation #HealthAndSafety @kprather88
Read 4 tweets
Aug 20, 2020
1/
Current scenario enabled by wishful scientists that dont understand the dynamics of policy & governance:

1- policymakers & polluters say 'show me the data'
2- we show them the data & they reply 'the data is not good enough';
3- finance 'experts' provide p-hacked forecasts
2/
3- of weak models based on mega incomplete data!
4- scientists know that we always need more data... agree & ask for funding to collect more data.
5- policymakers promise to fund research but never do because the media stories are enough to make it appear they are acting.
3/
6- The very few businesses who think they are profiting from polluting repeat the same misguided tactics year on year:
-Show me the data
-You have 'no proof of harm' from toxic air, water, and food.
-Everyone did/does it
-Enforcing #cleanair regulations will cause jobs loss
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11, 2020
@jesse_kroll @linseymarr @dylanhmorris @DrNeeltje As with anything, more knowledge is better. When we study #airborne contagions or #AirPollution many disciplines are required. Clinical, forensic, environmental, social, & occupational epidemiology all must be informed by all science. 1/
@jesse_kroll @linseymarr @dylanhmorris @DrNeeltje The preference of 1 observational association vs a 2nd (but 'newer') observational association (both being classified 'low level' evidence until dozens of associations are collected) when confronted with a novel #CoronaVirus or any other contagion is not
#ScienceBased. 2/
@jesse_kroll @linseymarr @dylanhmorris @DrNeeltje We must be prepared to quickly apply or adjust existing (i.e., #influenza) public health non-pharmaceutical recommendations to those of a new threat when we know the risk of harm from these interventions is low. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Mar 30, 2020
@VRiffault @jljcolorado @WHO @DrMariaNeira Devil's advocate now... Unknown risk associated with lack of evidence when the volume of observations is high should provoke the precautionary principle if no harm is clear.
We dont know if an infectious dose is possible via micro droplets. But, they could be. What's the harm? 2/
@VRiffault @jljcolorado @WHO @DrMariaNeira There's a shortage of masks for medical workers. Full stop. That's the key message. We can & should make our own masks or use the reusuable pollution respirators with silocone seals that medical workers are not using. WHO recommends masks for asymptomatic influenza outbreaks.
@VRiffault @jljcolorado @WHO @DrMariaNeira 'non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza'.
Search "Asymptomatic". You will land on the relevant guidelines table.
#PrecautionaryPrinciple
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(