R.Politik Profile picture
Oct 29 30 tweets 5 min read
A longer thread 🧵 on the question of #Putin and the possible use of #nuclearweapons: During his Valdai-speech, Vladimir Putin dedicated a substantial time to convince the world that Russia is not ready to use nuclear weapons. 1/
He said that Russia is not interested in using a “dirty bomb”: “it makes no sense for us, neither politically nor militarily”. 2/
He also made it clear that Russia does not plan to use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear power, except in cases prescribed in the Russian Military Doctrine. 3/
The logical question arises: How can we understand Putin’s nuclear rhetoric in general? 4/
One minute he is rattling off about nuclear weapons, creating an absolutely clear feeling of readiness to use them tomorrow, the next minute he is convincing everyone around him that there is no such thing, and it cannot happen. 5/
To understand this logic, we outline three main theses: The real position of Russia in accordance with its military logic, public rhetoric, and games. 6/
📌 First, the real position of Russia in accordance with its military logic. 7/
The position on the use of nuclear weapons in the context of the war in Ukraine is as it follows: it is possible in the case of “aggression against the Russian Federation using conventional weapons”, which would “endanger the existence of the state”. 8/
The problem here is that no one understands how the Russian leadership would interpret the “threat to the existence of the state”. 9/
If we assume that the current war against Ukraine is existential, and losing the war is a threat to the existence of the state (Putin has explicitly said so), then one can conclude that Russia will use nuclear weapons if there is no other military way to turn the war in its favor
That means, Russia will use nuclear weapons if there is a risk of a Ukrainian victory – the complete return to the territorial borders as of before 24th February, not to mention Crimea. 11/
📌 Second, public rhetoric. Putin’s rhetoric consists of two blocks of meaning, which he often uses separately, giving the impression that they contradict each other. 12/
The first block (the basic attitude) is that Russia does not want to use nuclear weapons, it does not benefit from using them. The second block is that it will use nuclear weapons under the conditions described in the military doctrine (see above). 13/
These two blocks of meaning do not contradict each other, but the emphasis of one of them forms a different impression: either as an attempt to deescalate, or as a threat. 14/
Just as, for example, if you ask Putin if he wants to continue the war in Ukraine, he will answer of course not, Russia is a peaceful country. 15/
But if you ask why it does, he will say that otherwise a war would have been waged against Russia. It is the same here. It does not intend to use nuclear weapons, but it will if it must. 16/
📌 Third, games. Putin’s verbal games with external audiences consists of balancing the blocks of meaning as described above. And how it works was already clearly visible. 17/
When Putin thinks that the military situation in Ukraine is more or less under control, he uses the basic setup/the basic block – saying that Russia does not want and will not use nuclear weapons. 18/
The threat comes into play when Putin has the feeling Ukraine is overstepping its limits, and the West needs a “shake-up”, a shock (as Ukraine is a tool of the West). This was the case in April, and it was the case in the end of September. Every time Russia retreated. 19/
If tomorrow Ukraine conducts a successful counter-offensive and swiftly removes Russian troops from significant territory, the nuclear threats will return. 20/
Therefore one should not treat Putin’s words based on the idea that he is changing his position, but based on an assessment of his subjective sense of the state of affairs in Ukraine. If he uses a basic “anti-nuclear” attitude, he believes that everything is relatively fine. 21/
If he starts saber-rattling, it’s an attempt to scare the West into a situation where it feels that Ukraine has “gone too far”. This all speaks only about his feelings, but not of any real practical plans to use nuclear weapons. 22/
They will remain in force if Russia feels that it is losing the war. It is very important that Putin’s understanding of the word “losing” will be entirely different from that of the West. 23/
Finally, there is another important plot affecting Moscow’s nuclear rhetoric. Putin’s speech is very similar to what he said during the accession ceremony of the Ukrainian regions. 24/
But this is new: Putin began to actively invest in the “anti-American” global world, deciding that this moment had long been and it was time to raise “non-Western” (in the value sense) countries to fight American globalism. 25/
Look how much enthusiasm and joy he had when he spoke: “what we are doing is very attractive to so many countries and people around the world!” And this is an extremely important context that is a deterrent to Russian nuclear, threatening rhetoric. 26/
Putin really wants to be liked, wants to be a positive hero fighting for global justice. Putin believes that there is a large-scale ideological war between the “Western world” and Russia for the minds of “neutral countries”, and that Russia is winning this war. 27/
And in this fight he feels very uncomfortable as a monster, rattling with nuclear weapons. This makes him fight the demonization of Russia’s image. Part of this demonization is nuclear blackmail. Hence Putin’s current, anti-nuclear rhetoric at Valdai. 28/
But this has nothing to do with any real military intentions/plans for Ukraine. Putin today hopes that it will not come to a worst-case scenario. 29/
For him, Russia can afford to not win for a certain time, but it cannot afford to lose. And if it comes down to that, to a loss, he will use nuclear weapons, because he will have no other option to not lose. End/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with R.Politik

R.Politik Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @R__Politik

Oct 30
Russia has suspended the grain deal. In our latest bulletin we explained that for Putin, the main goal here is not to close the deal per se, but to ‘sell’ prolongation for as high a price as possible. rpolitik.com/the-bulletin/b…
That explains the fact that it was not terminated but ‘suspended’, with the possibility to pull the West into the bargain. In the Kremlin’s understanding, the deal gives Russia two advantages.
Firstly, it is leverage, in a more general context, a way to draw the West into a scheme in which Russia believes it can affect Western interests and coerce it to cooperate.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 14
A thread 🧵 #Putin's press conference was surprising and eventful. To briefly summarise what was said:
📌 #Russia can and will escalate further (tear up the grain deal, launch new massive strikes on #Ukraine's infrastructure if necessary) if Ukraine attacks (in any sense).
📌 The first phase of #mobilisation ends in a fortnight. There is no need for new recruitment, but (!!!) if the Ministry of Defence says we should, then we would. A very routine, cold-blooded attitude.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 11
According to Vice, Elon Musk has recently spoken with Putin. And allegedly, Putin explained to him that Russia would do anything to achieve its goals, including using nuclear weapons. vice.com/en/article/ake…
If the world wants to avoid catastrophe, then Crimea and the four annexed regions must be recognized as Russian, plus Ukraine's neutral status must be guaranteed. Musk has refuted that he recently spoke with Putin.
Putin's position is nothing new. But the very fact of the conversation is interesting. Even if it did not take place in recent weeks, I have no doubts that Putin would not mind having it. For Putin, Musk is a representative of the "good" West that the Russian leader counts on.
Read 8 tweets
Oct 10
An extremely important point on the current situation... Before September, the war against #Ukraine was a personal matter for #Putin in alliance with marginal, peripheral radical elites who had long been waiting for it but had no real influence on anything.
The rest of the elites, some with momentum, others with pragmatic enthusiasm, followed Putin out of desperation (which is different for everyone, but in essence it is the same).
Now, things are changing.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 8
The explosion on the Crimean bridge: A 🧵 #CrimeanBridge
The #Kremlin's first reaction is rather expected - downplaying the event in the media, setting up all sorts of commissions, launching criminal proceedings...
But everyone is waiting for #Putin's reaction: after all, the strike on the bridge was considered one of the red lines, crossing which could lead to a "worst-case scenario" - an angry reaction, up to and including nuclear retaliation.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 21
The murder of Daria Dugina will have serious political consequences. 1/7 #Dugin
Firstly, it provokes a radicalisation of the conservative camp, which has lost one of "its own" and craves revenge and a demonstration of its own intransigence and toughness against its enemies. 2/7
It is not certain that it will achieve an increase in the level of repressions, which has its own logic, but the brutality and frequency of horizontal ideological confrontations will increase. And the authorities are not very good at regulating them. 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(