So one thing I've learnt if you are a money launder or scammer stay away from #vatfraud. Ripping off citizen's is low risk but if you tax authorities they will hunt you down. check @nicolaborzi article. ilfattoquotidiano.it/in-edicola/art…
European #vatfraud appears to be such a small world. reading through the article I recognised the reference to a MTIC VAT fraud scheme.
There wasn't just one #dannybarrs there was two senior and junior. Here's an old network graph of them. as you can see they are embedded in some of the best frauds in recent history.
Let me just zoom out a little so you can see the high quality brands they pre-built that dodgy promoters could purchase off-the shelf.
There's some cracking stories behind most of these 'brands' mostly well before #crytpo
I'm pretty certain it was jnr aka #bitfan2013 that convinced snr it #crypto was the future.
one of those dumpster's was #cryptocapital#bitfan2013 words of wisdom on #reddit inspired Panamanian based entrepreneur #ozyosef founder of #1btcxe to move into the money transmission business.
I'd love to reminisce about the rise and fall of #cryptocapital in #panama back in the days when Stuart Hoegner was counsel for #coinapult and #bitfinex was a customer/partner back in 2015 when coinapult was hacked and then a few months later was folded into #cryptocapital
With the impending holiday to the big house the Barrs looked to offload some of its assets and the #cryptocapital crew appear to be the ones that stepped up. No doubt the #globaltransactionservices brand was well cooked by then. Looking for a new jurisdiction
and home to continue their rampant fraud. They found a safe haven and like minded peeps in #zug. Being the branding genius they are to sweep away the sins of the past the new #cryptocapital parent co was named global trade solutions with the catchy gts.services domain.
so to stay under the radar #ozyosef put a bunch of his mates on the board and used his sister #ravidyosef as bagholder.
His partner in crime the infamous #ivanmolina appears to have stuck one his relatives on the management team of the backend banking software company #ett
fucking genius.
i keep digressing.....
back to the purpose of the tweet....#vatfraud and how ironic that #pagasia was knee's deep in the same type of #vatfraud as #gts and #dannybarrs was thrown in jail for facilitating.
But that's nothing compared to just how spooky of a co-incidence that #cryptocapital ends up at this address in #zug
I'm going to have to jump off the soapbox and get back to work. More tomorrow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now let's drill down on #tether's financial alchemy.
In a diminishing market (which has just got a whole load smaller) "secured loans" increased by nearly $1.64B (nearly 40%).
Yet we know nearly $1B of its secured loans to #celsius were liquidated. It's worth noting that the 130% over collateralised loans were likely to have a far higher LVR under the terms of the lending agreement.
Assuming the typical LVR is at least 50%. i.e., when you borrow $1 you require $2 of collateral.
by end of Jun 2022 #tether held $4.5B of collateral. 8 days later after the #celsius smash and grab this was down $3.2B.
So while non-binding LOI are well non-binding they often have some binding provisions (well at least the one's I've been a party to) specifically 'confidentiality' -
something like parties agree not to make public statements without prior consent of the other parties unless required by law. it's really not great form to bitchslap the other party after they came to you on their knees begging to be saved.
tbf @sbf_ftx was more than happy to hand out a couple of limp wristed #bitchslap's from his ivory tower (e.g. #celsius $2B).
Its kinda like it was always the intention of the LOI
yesterday I flagged the flaky wording used by #celsius in their suspension of services memo to its members. ""Activated a clause" in their Terms of Use....without actually stating which clause they were referrring to.
Having read through the Terms of Use it appears one reason for not specifying the clause the clause they have 'activated' is there are more than one clause they are relying upon to effect the suspension
one for Custody [you retain ownership of the asset] (Custody only began 15 April 2022) and the other clause(s) are for the balance of all accounts [you relinquish ownership to Celsius].
If you have a rental property. You make a return by finding some nice people who need a place to live they undertake to pay you x return per week and as long as they dont wreck the place or stop paying everyone is happy.
Essentially you are entrusting your asset to a third party on the promise that they will make payments in the future as agreed. If they stop paying you kick them out.
So imagine your shock and horror. that those nice people started to have some financial issues because they werent getting paid by someone else and gave you a heads up by email refering to a bit of html on a website. Essentially we will get back to you when we can sort you out.