2/ "Adiposity-related hypertriglyceridemia is mainly driven by increased numbers of triglyceride-rich VLDLs (which carry the largest proportion of triglycerides in blood). Concurrently, the cholesterol in these lipoproteins also seem to be higher at higher adiposity levels."
3/ And these next sentences are key -- take special note of the underlined text...
4/ So of course, an increase in remnants (particularly VLDL) result in higher overall levels of ApoB.
This is why I can never repeat enough times the problematic nature of looking at ApoB in isolation.
5/ The Lipid Energy Model (#LEM) posits we may be seeing these patterns due to a lack of delivery by these VLDL of their triglyceride cargo.
Whereas with #LMHRs may be demonstrating the opposite -- trafficking a lot of TG via VLDL at a higher rate of delivery.
6/ This would explain why #LMHRs would have very high fasting ApoB given they have high turnover of VLDL, thus more LDL particles and cholesterol as a result.
This would also explain why VLDL and TG itself would be lower in a fasted state given the higher turnover itself.
7/ Regardless, this highlights exactly why study on #LMHRs are so crucial given our data on populations with high ApoB/LDL are typically confounded as we see in this study by collinearity to another disease state.
Hence the importance of research such as our #LMHRstudy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ CCTA gives a scan of both calcified and non-calcified plaque in the arteries of the heart.
There's an extremely small risk of adverse effects from the contrast dye, and a low exposure to radiation with the latest machines.
However, CCTA scans can be pricy (ie $500-1000)
3/ CAC is just the calcification of the coronary arteries, but it is surprisingly correlative to soft plaque AND is very predictive of future events. Check out @khurramn1's work on this for more info.
It also requires no contrast dye, is lower radiation, and typically $99-300.
I think you make valid points with regard to a diet community having bad actors that can reflect on it, @jerryteixeira -- but I'd push back that one has to tow the party line on high fat and/or high meat in #keto or get hammered.
2/ I myself have brought up #PlantBasedKeto many times over to raise awareness, even though I try to avoid the diet debates. But I've not suffered any repercussions from the keto community.
3/ DietDoctor.com is arguably the largest resource for #LowCarb diet, and in the last couple years have put out a great deal more material on higher protein with lower fat as a diet direction option. Many low carbers prefer this emphasis over higher fat as a %
For one, this editorial is the first of its kind to gather MDs and PhDs together to help develop a clinical position on the #LMHR phenotype and importance of expanding research around this phenomenon.
That's hard to understate!
3/ Typically, there have been just two positions on the topic of high LDL on keto, particularly LMHRs.
- Conventional: LMHR *must* lower LDL/ApoB
- LH skeptic: LMHR can ignore LDL/ApoB
This editorial concludes those with high LDL-c/ApoB from keto "should consider" lowering.
I was originally shooting for a few weeks away, but it stretched into two months.
Honestly, I have to really credit @MichaelMindrum for inspiring me to really commit to this. It was easier than I assumed given the ongoing research efforts.
3/ The #LMHRstudy is nearing recruitment completion!
That said - we still have some participants to go to put us over the top!
So again, *please* visit LMHRstudy.com to see if you or someone you know is eligible for the study.
You / someone you know:
👉Had LDL 160 or under before keto
👉LDL increased to 190 or more on keto
👉HDL 60 or more
👉Triglycerides 80 or below
👉2 or more years on keto
While much of the feedback on @nicknorwitz’s new paper (below) has been positive, there have been some with concerns regarding use of CGMs for @harvardmed students in this context.
2/4 Assume the entire experiment was performed in an identical manner save one change:
Instead of using CGMs, the students simply did a high frequency of finger stick blood tests through a glucose monitor (glucometer), effectively getting likewise results to those reported.
3/4 Would this one alteration alleviate much of the concern about the CGM use?