First, what is nuclear fusion? It's a reaction that literally creates new atoms from old: lighter nuclei (say types of hydrogen) are smashed together to make heavier nuclei—and LOTS of energy. And the energy comes from an equation you already know! (Yes the one by Einstein)
You should care about fusion: apart from being the reaction that makes the Universe light up (powering stars) and the reaction that created most of the elements we're made of, fusion promises clean, safe, low radioactivity energy for everyone—and wow do we need more clean energy
When I say everyone, I don't just mean *today*—it's for the future too. Fusion's special hydrogen ingredients are outrageously common on Earth: 5g in every bathtub of seawater is deuterium and tritium can be made from lithium; there's likely enough for millions of years of energy
Now, there is a catch to this carbon-free energy source: fusion is hard! It happens at start of the universe, in stars, & in supernovae, but those are extreme places. We need to recreate those extreme conditions on Earth if we want to get energy out from fusion reactions.
Scientists, engineers, dictators, and even porn magnates have been trying to do fusion since the 1940s. The problem is that creating the extreme conditions needed—temperatures in the millions of degrees and pressures 300 billion times Earth's—requires a lot of energy up front.
The trick is to get NET energy gain: more energy out than you put in. This is the big prize in fusion. Demonstrating this a single time, in a single experiment (ignoring the energy cost of running the lab) would be a huge landmark in attempts to get clean energy from star power
Now the joke is that fusion is "30 years away... and always will be!". But actually HUGE progress has been made in fusion over the decades, and the last few years have really seen things, err, heating up.
Right, big recent breakthroughs: in February, the JET experiment released the highest total amount of energy from fusion reactions ever (59 megajoules); in just 5 seconds there was enough energy released to boil about 60 kettles. Close to industrial scale! bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…
This wasn't net energy gain: they got 33% of net energy gain for five seconds, and the record on that machine is 67%. But it was a LOT of (gross) fusion energy, & controlling fusion for five seconds at 100 million degrees, almost ten times hotter than the Sun, is super impressive
Last December, China’s EAST "tokamak" machine managed to control fusion conditions, 100 million degrees, for 1000 seconds. This is a stunning development given control used to last for <milliseconds. Though the machine is not running with 'real' fusion fuel (unlike at JET)
Other exciting news: proof that a 'stellarator' fusion machine could work, *billions* of USD in investment in the fusion industry, and new superconducting magnets (better control) that produce magnetic fields half a million times stronger than the Earth’s.
But what I'm MOST excited about is progress on the US' National Ignition Facility, @lasers_llnl. In August last year, they hit 70% of net energy gain! A world record.
Lots of people got interested in NIF, including @coreyspowell and @emollick
How they could get there might involve cracking some insanely hard physics and engineering, or just hitting it with a bigger laser—or, as NIF's Operations Manager Bruno called it, "a bigger hammer". An excerpt from #TheStarBuilders book:
And guess what? NIF has been ramping up the laser energy... take a look at this from a recent blog post from November on a laser shot where staff upped the input energy (the hammer) from 1.8 megajoules a couple of years ago to more than 2 megajoules in September:
By the way, if you're not sure how NIF works—it uses a laser to squeeze enough energy into a small time and space that fusion conditions are created. And it does it only for a brief time before the capsule it fires at falls apart. In those TEN NANOSECONDS though, fusion happens
I am terrible at tagging people who might potentially be into the content in threads but yeah @Noahpinion, @AdamRutherford, @mattsclancy, @AstroKatie, @FryRsquared you all have followers who might find this thread on fusion being closer than you think interesting.
And here's an EXTREMELY exciting update on this thread... we could actually have hit scientific net energy gain
Get excited... press conference from @ENERGY on fusion results from the US National Ignition Facility @lasers_llnl on Tuesday with a potentially HUGE #nuclearfusion announcement: FT reporting that NIF has hit scientific net energy gain! on.ft.com/3PgDdya#TheStarBuilders
Rumours have been circulating that this is what happened but I understand no official confirmation as yet—but numbers might be as much as 120% of net energy gain.
If this is true, we are witnessing a moment of history: controlling the power source of the stars is the greatest..
technological challenge humanity has ever undertaken. Scientists have struggled to show that fusion can release more energy out than is put in since the 1950s, and the researchers at Lawrence Livermore seem to have finally and absolutely smashed this decades-old goal. This...
Huw: "we would have acted differently with the benefit of hindsight... but I think we got the big picture right" also talking about the need for humility, and that "big things" have happened. "The big story is about gas prices".
Huw: "We've acted decisively... that action is not over".
Today, @ONS & @DataSciCampus publish an article tracking the prices of the lowest-cost grocery items using web-scraping, inspired by @BootstrapCook & other campaigners who have rightly asked about the #costofliving experiences of the poorest in society. Here's what we found 🧵
First: a caveat. This is highly experimental research, as web-scraping supermarket data for 30 grocery items can go wrong in multiple ways! But even though this is experimental, we thought it was really important to talk about it and the results. 2/n #datascience#econtwitter
Okay: results. Lowest cost items (eg value brands) have had significant price increases: 13 of 30 monitored had average lowest price increase faster than overall equiv. inflation measure. Big movers: pasta (up 50%), crisps (17%), bread (16%), minced beef (16%) & rice (15%). 3/n
#BREAKING#fusion#news: The National Ignition Facility (@LLnL) has reported a *twenty-five times* increase in energy released as compared to their 2018 world record for laser fusion: 1.3 MJ out for 1.92 MJ in, a 67.7% gain in energy!! 🤯 llnl.gov/news/national-…
This is MASSIVE. It’s so close to energy breakeven that it’s now almost inevitable that NIF will make history and be the first to hit 100%, showing that #fusion is not just a power source for the stars, but that it *could* work on Earth too. Here I am touring the NIF with Bruno:
I’ve long rated the chances of NIF of getting there 1st, simply because they have a machine that—in principle—has the size and science to do it right now. (I give serious love & attention to this giant laser & the people behind it in #TheStarBuilders)
People think a *net energy gain* nuclear fusion experiment is a long way off (as far as the Sun, the nearest fusion reactor). Researching #TheStarBuilders, I discovered extraordinary progress... hold on to your seats for a 🧵on fusion #physics and advances in #fusionenergy! 1/n
What's net energy? It's putting 1 unit of energy into a fusion machine & getting *more* than 1 unit out. Breakeven in energy = same out as was put in. Scientists refer to percentages: 100% for breakeven, >100% for net energy gain. Gain is like a single match lighting a big fire🔥
Why is net energy gain important? It's the first step to developing fusion as a power source. Scientists have been trying since the 1940s, & it’s perhaps the greatest technical challenge humanity has ever taken on. And we *need* cleaner energy.
Now, let’s talk about the advances.
1. Jazzit. “Ever wanted your scripts to play music while running/ on erroring out? Of course you didn’t. But here it is anyway”
Yes, Jazzit laughs at your expense when your code hits an error, here via a clip from curb your enthusiasm. github.com/Sangarshanan/j…
(see also: beepy)
2. Handcalcs
Handcalcs renders maths in latex in your console/notebook and can also export latex equations to file. *Really* useful for writing papers where you want your code and the mathematics in your paper to be consistent.