➡️The Mbappe Plan - Worked to a degree
➡️ Jude Who... Tchouameni's goal threat was overlooked
➡️ Saka exploited French Weak Link - Theo...
➡️ #BeKind Kane's pen... shit happens
Despite being double marked, Mbappe embarked upon a run which led to the first goal, completing sucking in the English bodies throwing themselves at him and leaving space open for Tchoumeni to take advantage.
He also had a moment where he made Walker contemplate retirement...
But aside from these glimpses, England on the whole did a decent job. Deschamps needs to free up his movement to avoid him being marked out of a game as future opponents may not be as willing to go toe to toe...
Long have I pondered as to whether Theo Hernandez is sufficiently tested enough defensively in Serie A and we saw yesterday that he was a defensive liability IMO. Saka was a step above and he couldn't really mark him cleanly and then the rash challenge on Mount for the pen...
Theo is definitely better going forwards than back and this is an area all their future opponents need to target.
What does not help is that the French made him defend against Saka 1 v 1, Mbappe barely got back and Rabiot isn't robust defensively. He needs protection.
Kane put in the best big match England performance of his career until the dreaded second penalty. The way he was picking up space was not unexpected what with France lacking a pure CDM who constantly marks that space in front of the centre backs...
This meant he was able to roam around at will.
What was particularly impressive was his ability to roll centre backs with his back to goal and he just generally looked a threat even in open play. Shame how it ended though... does he fall below Linekar, Shearer and Rooney?
Much was spoken about whether Tchouameni would keep Bellingham quiet, but funnily enough it was Tchoameni who ended up having the bigger attacking impact and it was Bellingham who did a poor job closing down Tchouameni's shot.
Aside from this moment, it was a to and fro encounter but I think the Frenchman can be pleased that Bellingham was not really at the heart of all of England's best play. However he will need to control games better especially if they face Croatia or Argentina.
One of the most fascinating yet barely mentioned battles was Giroud vs Maguire. Both look like complete opposites but in terms of styles of play, the Prince and the Gargoyle are very well matched - immobile, colossuses in the air with underrated technique that belies their size.
Giroud kept getting in ahead of Maguire, that chance which Pickford saved was a hint of what was to come. Eventually Giroud would make his mark with a fantastic goal and Maguire I am afraid was just beat to the punch - a moment which takes him down a notch in the England HOF.
Bellingham against Tchouameni was bad enough but Henderson failing to close down the left footed Griezmann from putting in a ball was shocking defending. An experienced player like that not spotting the danger that this situation presented blew me away.
If Henderson makes that extra effort to get across and cut off the ball, Griezmann would have had to go on to his weak foot or pass it back, these little margins and moments decide games and England were found wanting.
The wisdom of allowing Kane to take a second penalty is a 'Captain Hindsight' type of criticism. No one has ever questioned his ability to take a penalty... he had already scored one with aplomb - ain't no one going to be taking it off the captain in that moment - he mishit it...
it happens and yes its painful, but you can't blame the manager for that.
As for the subs, no idea why Sterling is coming on ahead of Grealish or why your most threatening player in Saka was taken off. Could Hendo have come off sooner, with Foden moving to CAM?
A pulsating game, another classic I think to put down in English footballing folklore alongside Argentina in 1986, Germany 1990, Argentina in 1998 and Portugal 2006. Games in which England competed, were marginally the better side but bottled it in key key moments...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Beside major decisions going against one, what type of bad refereeing display impacts a team the most? I'll elaborate in thread 1) Overly lenient on fouls 2) Fouls called when clean tackles 3) Overly cheap yellows for an aggressive team 4) No yellows for opponent v a clean team
3-IMO quickdraw Mcgraw refs dishing out yellows for next to nothing for aggressive teams = doesn't happen so often anymore but this would probs be the worst, even refs in the champs league are more lenient than before. Argentina v Netherlands was a rare 1 off but for both teams.
Personally I feel teams that don't get given fouls when they are tend to respond with more sloppy ball control and worse dribbling cos wanna over-burst past opponent with revenge+start throwing themselves on the floor to give the ref a chance to even it out/justice-rarely get it.
➡️ Croatia to dominate possession but Argentina wont mind
➡️ Litmus test for Gvardiol
➡️ How do Argentina deal with Croatia wide threat? 3-5-2 or 4-4-2?
➡️ Croatia's Aerial Threat
@Effmatch Croatia’s slow style of play may suit Argentina as the latter will look to play on the break. Croatia don’t have rapid players, so they’ll look to build up slowly to allow their players to get into dangerous positions. Argentina are likely to forgo indulging a possession battle.
@Effmatch Argentina struggled with Saudi Arabia's intensity in the opening game. A slow game would favour the Argentinians, who they themselves do not possess much pace in the side. Expect Fernandez and De Paul to hold their shape, blocking the supply lines to Kramaric.
I agree that after 2007/08 - the quality of United football took a nose dive in terms of attacking excellence and relied heavily on their pre existing defensive structure which still seemed to keep going.
One of the biggest factors was loss of Ronaldo and building the side around a fatter Wayne Rooney and the decline in decision making quality of the players coming into the side. Declining Scholes and no replacement, wingers were sub par.
✅Easy Build Up v 4-4-2 but difficult v 4-3-3
✅Solid in Low Block but energy sapping
❌Unsuited to high press/chase lead
✅Ideal Player Profiles
❌Not ideal for Grassroots
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s push higher to provide options after initial breakout)
- CM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
- CF's may need to pull wide to provide direct passing option
Build Up vs 4-4-2 Press (Easy to find space as it is 4 v 2 in midfield)
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s push higher to provide options
- CM’s can drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
- CF's pull wide to provide progressive option
✅In possession (Build Up against 4-4-2/4-3-3 and Final Third)
✅Out of possession (Shape for Pressing & Low Block)
✅Transitions
✅Ideal Player Profiles
❌Not ideal for Grassroots
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s drop short to provide passing options
- CAM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
Build Up vs 4-4-2 Press
Just like the basic outline (see video clip)
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s drop short to provide passing options
- CAM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third if the CDM is marked
🔴VVD showed Lukaku's true level
🔴Liverpool need Origi against low block
🔴James = handball but not a red
🔴Havertz and Mount dangerous first half
🔴Liverpool fall asleep from corner
Havertz has always been a major set piece threat from his Leverkusen days, so why he's being marked by Henderson and not a VVD is poor man marking strategy by Liverpool.
He should be the main focus from a corner, not Lukaku.
Havertz and Mount were excellent in the first half and supported Lukaku with interchanging runs, runs in behind and Fabinho struggled to get to grips.
James and Alonso holding the width, allowed Chelsea's CAMs the freedom to wreak havoc centrally and in the half spaces.