➡️ Croatia to dominate possession but Argentina wont mind
➡️ Litmus test for Gvardiol
➡️ How do Argentina deal with Croatia wide threat? 3-5-2 or 4-4-2?
➡️ Croatia's Aerial Threat
@Effmatch Croatia’s slow style of play may suit Argentina as the latter will look to play on the break. Croatia don’t have rapid players, so they’ll look to build up slowly to allow their players to get into dangerous positions. Argentina are likely to forgo indulging a possession battle.
@Effmatch Argentina struggled with Saudi Arabia's intensity in the opening game. A slow game would favour the Argentinians, who they themselves do not possess much pace in the side. Expect Fernandez and De Paul to hold their shape, blocking the supply lines to Kramaric.
@Effmatch Gvardiol is set to have his biggest test to date. He managed incredibly well against Richarlison but Messi will be a different challenge. We’ll find out how Gvardiol defends the space, not the man. Messi and Alvarez will look to drop into pockets of space, tempting the defenders.
@Effmatch Gvardiol and Lovren’s communication will be key in deciding who steps up and who drops, without creating gaps that Messi can exploit like he did against the Netherlands. Brozovic's lack of mobility may also be an issue to cover the space between the defence and midfield.
@Effmatch Against the Netherlands, Argentina set up with a 3-5-2 in an effective ploy to stifle Dumfries. The 3-5-2 is a great option to push the opposition wide players back, deploying your wing backs further up the pitch and having a wide centre half covering the space behind them.
@Effmatch Perisic and Sosa on the left are likely to be Croatia’s most threatening players. If Argentina can force Sosa back, Perisic will lack an overlapping option, taking him out the game. On the other side, Juranovic has shown great verve and energy to provide a credible threat.
@Effmatch Issue for Argentina is the suspension to Acuna. Tagliafico may struggle to play as a wing back, so this immediately makes the 3-5-2 option much less viable and 4-4-2 the more likely option. This should give the Croatians some joy on the left hand side with Sosa and Perisic.
@Effmatch Argentina struggled aerially when the Netherlands decided to go for the jugular. Whilst Croatia don’t possess the same level of threat that Weghorst and Luuk de Jong gave for the Dutch, the likes of Perisic and Petkovic could provide enough aerial prowess to worry Argentina.
@Effmatch Differential-
Perisic is Croatia’s biggest threat going forward. His aerial ability at the back post will be key for Croatia if they wish to make a dent in the Argentinian backline. Argentina’s defensive strategy is likely to be predicated on shutting his flank down.
@Effmatch Pythagoras Perspective-
Argentina to win. This game is a bad style matchup for Croatia, who may have to rely on a defensive error to score. The slow pace of the game is likely to favour the Argentinians, who will cede possession in favour of transitional football.
@Effmatch What do you guys think? Is it Messi's time or will Modric's boys spoil the South American party train once again? Like and comment below your thoughts/predictions for tomorrow's game!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Beside major decisions going against one, what type of bad refereeing display impacts a team the most? I'll elaborate in thread 1) Overly lenient on fouls 2) Fouls called when clean tackles 3) Overly cheap yellows for an aggressive team 4) No yellows for opponent v a clean team
3-IMO quickdraw Mcgraw refs dishing out yellows for next to nothing for aggressive teams = doesn't happen so often anymore but this would probs be the worst, even refs in the champs league are more lenient than before. Argentina v Netherlands was a rare 1 off but for both teams.
Personally I feel teams that don't get given fouls when they are tend to respond with more sloppy ball control and worse dribbling cos wanna over-burst past opponent with revenge+start throwing themselves on the floor to give the ref a chance to even it out/justice-rarely get it.
➡️The Mbappe Plan - Worked to a degree
➡️ Jude Who... Tchouameni's goal threat was overlooked
➡️ Saka exploited French Weak Link - Theo...
➡️ #BeKind Kane's pen... shit happens
Despite being double marked, Mbappe embarked upon a run which led to the first goal, completing sucking in the English bodies throwing themselves at him and leaving space open for Tchoumeni to take advantage.
He also had a moment where he made Walker contemplate retirement...
But aside from these glimpses, England on the whole did a decent job. Deschamps needs to free up his movement to avoid him being marked out of a game as future opponents may not be as willing to go toe to toe...
I agree that after 2007/08 - the quality of United football took a nose dive in terms of attacking excellence and relied heavily on their pre existing defensive structure which still seemed to keep going.
One of the biggest factors was loss of Ronaldo and building the side around a fatter Wayne Rooney and the decline in decision making quality of the players coming into the side. Declining Scholes and no replacement, wingers were sub par.
✅Easy Build Up v 4-4-2 but difficult v 4-3-3
✅Solid in Low Block but energy sapping
❌Unsuited to high press/chase lead
✅Ideal Player Profiles
❌Not ideal for Grassroots
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s push higher to provide options after initial breakout)
- CM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
- CF's may need to pull wide to provide direct passing option
Build Up vs 4-4-2 Press (Easy to find space as it is 4 v 2 in midfield)
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s push higher to provide options
- CM’s can drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
- CF's pull wide to provide progressive option
✅In possession (Build Up against 4-4-2/4-3-3 and Final Third)
✅Out of possession (Shape for Pressing & Low Block)
✅Transitions
✅Ideal Player Profiles
❌Not ideal for Grassroots
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s drop short to provide passing options
- CAM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third
Build Up vs 4-4-2 Press
Just like the basic outline (see video clip)
- CB’s split creating space for CDM to receive
- FB’s drop short to provide passing options
- CAM’s may need to drop short to facilitate progression from defensive third if the CDM is marked
🔴VVD showed Lukaku's true level
🔴Liverpool need Origi against low block
🔴James = handball but not a red
🔴Havertz and Mount dangerous first half
🔴Liverpool fall asleep from corner
Havertz has always been a major set piece threat from his Leverkusen days, so why he's being marked by Henderson and not a VVD is poor man marking strategy by Liverpool.
He should be the main focus from a corner, not Lukaku.
Havertz and Mount were excellent in the first half and supported Lukaku with interchanging runs, runs in behind and Fabinho struggled to get to grips.
James and Alonso holding the width, allowed Chelsea's CAMs the freedom to wreak havoc centrally and in the half spaces.