Why this thread Now
>>An acid attack in in #Delhi has once again brought back to focus the heinous crime of acid attacks and the easy availability of corrosive substances.
>>An acid attack, also called acid throwing, vitriol attack, or vitriolage, is a form of violent assault involving the act of throwing acid or a similarly corrosive substance onto the body of another.
>>It intends to disfigure, maim, torture, or kill.
2/n
>>Perpetrators of these attacks throw corrosive liquids at their victims, usually at their faces, burning them, and damaging skin tissue, often exposing and sometimes dissolving the bones.
3/n
>>The most common types of acid used in these attacks are sulphuric and nitric acid.
>>Hydrochloric acid is sometimes used but is much less damaging.
How prevalent are acid attacks in India?
4/n
>>According to data compiled by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), there were 150 such cases recorded in 2019, 105 in 2020 and 102 in 2021
5/n
>> West Bengal and UP consistently record the highest number of such cases generally accounting for nearly 50% of all cases in the country year on year.
>>The charge-sheeting rate of acid attacks stood at 83% and the conviction rate at 54% in 2019.
6/n
>>In 2020, the figures stood at 86% and 72% respectively.
>>In 2021, the figures were recorded to be 89% and 20% respectively.
7/n
What is the law on acid attacks?
>>Until 2013, acid attacks were not treated as separate crimes.
>>However, following amendments carried out in the IPC, acid attacks were put under a separate section (326A) of the IPC.
8/n
>>Such attacks made punishable with a minimum imprisonment of 10 years which is extendable to life along with fine
>>The law also has provisions for punishment for denial of treatment to victims or police officers refusing to register an FIR or record any piece of evidence
9/n
>>Denial of treatment (by both public and private hospitals) can lead to imprisonment of up to one year and dereliction of duty by a police officer is punishable by imprisonment of up to two years.
10/n
Creating deterrence against acid attack
(1) Clear rules
>>In 2013, the Supreme Court took cognizance of acid attacks and passed an order on the regulation of sales of corrosive substances.
11/n
>>Based on the order, the MHA issued an advisory to all states on how to regulate acid sales and framed the Model Poisons Possession and Sale Rules, 2013 under The Poisons Act, 1919.
12/n
>>It asked states to frame their own rules based on model rules, as the matter fell under the purview of states.
(2) Regulation of acid sale
>>In 2015, MHA issued an advisory to all states to ensure speedy justice in cases of acid attacks by expediting prosecution.
13/n
>>According to the MHA’s directions and the model rules, over-the-counter sale of acid was not allowed unless the seller maintains a logbook/register recording the sale of acid.
14/n
>>This logbook was to also contain the details of the person to whom acid is sold, the quantity sold, the address of the person and also specify the reason for procuring acid.
>>The buyer must also prove he/she is above 18 years of age.
15/n
(3) Effective monitoring
>>Sellers are also required to declare all stocks of acid with the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) within 15 days and in case of undeclared stock of acid.
16/n
>>The SDM can confiscate the stock and suitably impose a fine of up to Rs 50,000 for a breach of any of the directions.
17/n
Rules for victim compensation and care
>>
Free treatment: States are supposed to ensure that treatment provided to acid attack victims in any hospital, public or private, is free of cost.
18/n
>>Aftercare and rehabilitation: Based on Supreme Court directions, the MHA asked states to make sure acid attack victims are paid compensation of at least Rs. 3 lakhs by the concerned State Government/UT.
19/n
>>Funding to NGOs: MHA suggested states should also extend social integration programs to the victims for which NGOs could be funded to exclusively look after their rehabilitative requirements.
20/n
How to Prevent such attacks
>>Still on rise: The regulations on acid sales largely help in tracking the accused and not so much in prevention.
21/n
>>Regulatory bottlenecks: Acid is still easily available in many places. Then these are crimes of passion. In a majority of cases the accused is not even thinking about consequences.
22/n
What needs to be done
>>Things improve as social attitudes are changing and the focus of the police in dealing with crimes against women can cause some deterrence.
>>But the key to solving this problem will always remain in society.
23/n
>>""MOST IMPORTANTLY"" , We must create more awareness. Parents must teach their children the importance of boundaries and consent.
24/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
>>A grammatical problem by #Panini that has defeated Sanskrit scholars since the 5th Century BC has finally been solved by an Indian Ph.D. student at the University of Cambridge.
1/n
Who was Panini?
>>Panini was a #Sanskrit philologist, grammarian, and revered scholar in ancient India, variously dated between the 6th and 4th century BCE.
2/n
>>Since the discovery and publication of his work by European scholars in the nineteenth century, Panini has been considered the “first descriptive linguist” and even labelled as “the father of linguistics”.
3/n
The 6th Edition of #India - #Kazakhstan joint training exercise “KAZIND-22” is being conducted at Umroi (Meghalaya).
It is a joint annual training exercise with the Kazakhstan Army and was instituted in 2016 as Exercise Prabal Dostyk, which was later upgraded to a company level
>> To build positive military relations, imbibe each other’s best practices and promote the ability to operate together while undertaking counter terrorist operations in semi urban / jungle scenario.
How is Kazakhstan Important for India?
1) It Surrounded by the Caspian Sea in the west to Russia in the North and China in the East, Kazakhstan, the largest country in Central Asia and the ninth largest country in the world asserts great strategic importance.
India calls Pak Foreign Minister’s remarks "'uncivilised"
These comments are a new low, even for Pakistan. Pak's Foreign Min has obviously forgotten this day in 1971, which was a direct result of the genocide unleashed by Pakistani rulers against ethnic Bengalis & Hindus: MEA
Pakistan is a country that glorifies Osama bin Laden as a martyr, and shelters terrorists like Lakhvi, Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar, Sajid Mir and Dawood Ibrahim. No other country can boast having 126 UN-designated terrorists and 27 UN-designated terrorist entities: MEA
We wish that Pak FM would have listened more sincerely y'day at the UNSC to the testimony of Anjali Kulthe, a Mumbai nurse who saved the lives of 20 pregnant women from the bullets of the Pak terrorist Ajmal Kasab. Clearly, FM was more interested in whitewashing Pak’s role: MEA
How Indian Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru Rejected US (1950) and USSR (1955) offer for Permanent seat at UN Security Council
>>With the passage of time, and a more relaxed bureaucratic regime in many parts of the world, the long-buried archives are opening up.
1/n
It is now possible draw a reasonably accurate picture of what may have actually transpired.
>>There is now both circumstantial and archival evidence that the UNSC seat was indeed offered to India by the US in 1950 and by the USSR in 1955.
2/n
>>This offer came at a time when Washington was looking to shape the UN’s decision-making in its favour.
>>The Soviet Union had walked out of the UN in January 1950 in protest against the US (and others)
blocking the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking up
>> This, despite the warning by Babasaheb Ambedkar and the reluctance of Sardar Patel to be associated with what came to be known as Article 370 of the Indian constitution on 17 October 1949.
2/n
We tend to forget some important markers from our past; otherwise, we should have set in stone these words spoken wisely by B.R. Ambedkar when he refused to draft Article 370.
3/n
Indian Air Force practicing OCA missions against Chinese PLAAF over North East India.
>> Offensive counter-air (OCA) is a military term for the suppression of an enemy's military air power, primarily through ground attacks targeting enemy air bases: disabling or destroying parked aircraft, runways, fuel facilities, hangars, air traffic control facilities and other
aviation infrastructure. Ground munitions like bombs are typically less expensive than more sophisticated air-to-air munitions, and a single ground munition can destroy or disable multiple aircraft in a very short time whereas aircraft already flying must typically be shot down