it's been widely noted that #Christianity, during its early centuries, appealed to Mediterranean audiences by appropriating something of the form and iconography of the <i>mystery cults</i>.
it's probably impossible to summarize "mystery cults" in a tweet or two...
(1/x)
...for one thing, I have no idea how many existed, before the fusion of Christianity with Roman tyranny--which led to the wholesale desecration and destruction of all forms of non-Christian worship throughout the Roman dominion--made sure that we'd never know the answer.
(2/x)
right-wing frauds of the @DineshDSouza / @dalepartridge / @MattWalshBlog type love to pretend as though "terrorism" is a crime that only brown-skinned infidels ever carry out, but terroristic violence and pogroms have been central to #Christianity since its earliest days.
(3/x)
this is always to be borne in mind in dealing with and discussion Christianity: it made itself the One True Faith, honoring the One True God and his One True Son, *by force*. Judaism has coexisted with polytheism and paganism; #Christians have never able to manage this.
(4/x)
#Christianity inherited the Roman thirst for violent conquest; two thousand years later, almost ever #Christian celebrity in public life--@dalepartridge, @JerryFalwellJr, @laurenboebert, whoever--is a bloodthirsty, cruel, merciless spokesperson for organized violence.
(5/x)
the modern-day #Christian who (like @dalepartridge, @DouthatNYT, &c.) has made a *career* from publicizing their supposed #faith and profiting from it, is kindly to police-state rule, harsh and arbitrary "criminal justice", executions, and right-wing paramilitary violence.
(6/x)
there is *nothing new* in this. #Christianity has *always* been like this since the days when Christian street gangs cruised round the cities of the Mediterranean, smashing up everything sacred that wasn't _theirs_. @DouthatNYT would have done it, or at least *praised* it.
(7/x)
this must always be remembered about #Christianity. no honest discussion about #Christian history or "Christian values" is possible without acknowledging that Christianity has always been violent and "eliminationist"--unable to live peacefully with any sort of competition.
(8/x)
the #Christian God is "the One True God" not because there never have been other gods; it's because He tried His best to murder the others.
like Cronos, the Christian God tried to assure unquestioned rule by eating His rivals.
at some point in the devolution and degradation of the American #conservative movement, the right-wing commentariat all decided that feelings were bad. human emotions weren't *real*. emotions were for the weak-willed, the liberal bleeding hearts, the women, and so forth.
(1/x)
the accession of @RonaldReagan, the @GOP's wizened cigar-store cowboy President, must surely have accelerated this process. the whole basis of the Reaganite cult movement was *sentimental*: he was pointing the United States *backwards*, to nostalgia about Second World War.
(2/x)
Reagan himself had almost nothing to do with World War II; he made movies during the war years, while other actors fought. like a lot of draft-dodging #conservatives, Reagan compensated for his cowardice with jingo patriotism—eight years of nauseating, cloying lip-service.
there's a phenomenon that @realDonaldTrump, @elonmusk, @mtaibbi, and a host of other famous and influential persons—especially celebrity #CEOs—have done well to exploit. they've milked this phenomenon for every ounce and every drop of social credit that can be wrung.
(1/x)
it's simply this: @elonmusk *looks* incompetent, which somehow "proves" he's a master planner.
somehow the strings of public embarrassments and temper tantrums and arbitrary decisions adds up to a grand strategy. that's what an #ElonMusk acolyte would say, anyway.
(2/x)
as always, I can't guess as to whether @mtaibbi or @bariweiss or @ShellenbergerMD or any of the other smaller disasters who've crowded round the larger disaster that is @elonmusk *really* believes in the man. I use words like "cult" but I don't know if it's accurate.
the @RonaldReagan cabinet was much like @Quillette or @SubstackInc is these days: a loose aggregation of crooks and cranks, miscellaneous right-wing ideologues who did badly in professional life and were inclined to blame "liberals" or "the government" for their problems.
(2/x)
making wild, unsubstantiated claims was now the *in* thing, during @RonaldReagan's figurehead presidency—that's the real power a president has over a country, by the way.
people consciously or sub-consciously copy how a president talks. especially, they copy the *jokes*.
the intellectual damage done by #CSLewis and the cult of #Christian#apologetics that he unwittingly founded is becoming clearer to me. the situation is a bad one.
it's easy to explain: a large fraction of Western intellectuals have, without admitting it, rejected #doubt.
(1/x)
Jack Lewis taught a whole lot of clever, sophistical #Christians how to talk as if they were absolutely certain of themselves even though they were on uncertain ground—which is roughly how Lewis carried himself in the intellectual arena. the bad habits spread from there.
(2/x)
but I contend the problem is endemic to #Christianity. this isn't just Jack Lewis's problem, or Mr. @dalepartridge's problem; this is a fundamental *fault* in Christianity.
Christianity is intellectually incoherent because it has refused to deal with its own doubts.
recently a friend of ours, @Lady_Lupae, showed us an excellent comedy film pertaining to the fall of the Berlin Wall and the social changes that came to East Germany after that. the film's called "Good Bye, Lenin!" and it's a bittersweet satire.
~Mona
among other things, the film reminds us of how *old-fashioned* civic pride has come to seem.
Western society has been taught to sneer at itself; it's a very perplexing state of affairs. "everything's a joke anyway, relax and make money"—that's the @mtaibbi / @jbarro way.
~Mona
Christiane, the old East German Communist woman, seems starchy and unpleasant chiefly because she takes society very seriously; she's always talking about trying to make the system work, going to meetings, and so forth.
the most important technological development since the days of the Second World War has undoubtedly been the elaboration of the *semiconductor*. the raw might of electricity—its power to move motors, cause lights to glow, and so forth—was now subject to minute control.
(1/x)
"semiconductor" means only "half-conductor", hence the name is somewhat misleading. while it's true that semiconducting materials tend not to be as electrically conductive as pure metals, partial conduction of electricity is not the distinctive feature of semiconductors.
(2/x)
what distinguishes semiconductors, and makes them useful, is the mode of electrical conduction—the way that the electrons move through the material.
in metallic conduction, electrons move through a continuous "sea" of electron density, shared by all atoms in the metal.