#Vaccineswork Here is an antivax-astronomy crossover. When Halley's comet was coming back to Earth, cyanogen was discovered in its tail, along with the knowledge that Earth was going to pass through. There was great consternation that we were going to get cyanogen poisoning. https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/who-really-discovered-hal
People capitalized on the opportunity to sell cyanogen protection kits, pills, and gas masks, all the while - forgetting a fundamental principle of physics known as density. That's 3.75$ per pill, in US $ in 2023 approximately. #astronomy #charlatan #ScienceTwitter
While it is true that concentrated cyanogen/ cyanide is toxic, you are highly highly unlikely to get hurt by 10 molecules of cyanogen blowing past you. The dose makes the poison. The anti-comet pill dudes don't want you to know that.
This type of fearmongering happens with classical pediatric vaccines all the time. Rational people took it as an opportunity to watch a once in a lifetime opportunity.
Take home: There's always a charlatan around the next corner. More science literacy can benefit every community. Most direct benefit - your wallet will appreciate you when you ignore a charlatan.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frank Han MD 🇺🇦Pediatric/ACHD/GUCH Cardiologist

Frank Han MD 🇺🇦Pediatric/ACHD/GUCH Cardiologist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @han_francis

Jan 12
#VaccinesWork #COVID19 Did the COVID vaccine myocarditis out of Taiwan study reveal new scary EKG findings? Definitely not, so lets discuss what it really showed.
TLDR: (1) If you don't want to deal with immunization myocarditis I understand but you should really seriously consider the side effects of COVID, and mitigate your exposure. (2) EKG is not an adequate test on its own to independently diagnose myocarditis. Image
An example of a person who had viral myocarditis is here - geisinger.org/health-and-wel… . Viral side effects don't get enough airtime.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
Stating information that is clearly misrepresenting the articles that they came from is hardly a helpful way to help the genuinely vaccine injured. Lets debunk what the MP had to say - #VaccinesWork
You referenced the Israeli article on Emergency medical service calls - that article tallied total calls, not actual cardiac diagnoses. It is not possible to conclude all the calls were 💉 myocarditis; even the article itself notes that. reuters.com/article/factch…
There have been plenty of issues identified with Malhotras analysis of the data, and just one of them is here - sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-aseem-malh…
Read 7 tweets
Dec 5, 2022
#COVID19 #vaccineswork #Pathtwitter one of the pathology groups affiliated with The German Center for Infection Research (DZIF) put out an autopsy study on some adults who were found to be deceased after COVID immunization. Lets analyze: link.springer.com/article/10.100….
35 deceased were analyzed and 10 were found to have obvious other causes of death, but 5 of this group were particularly concerning to the authors because those had findings of myocarditis and also died without obvious warning symptoms. This isn't the full story though.
I do like their procedure used to arrive at the histopathologic diagnosis of myocarditis (our professions gold standard criteria); that part is secure. Part of their core conclusion is the decedents died of an arrhythmia from myocarditis - this is a hard diagnosis to establish...
Read 18 tweets
Nov 25, 2022
#VaccinesWork #medtwitter One of the most insidious tactics of the antivax world is to weave in kernels of truth with antivax talking points so that the untrained reader has difficulty telling things apart. Lets debunk Aseem Malhotra's lecture in Euston, dated Nov 2022.
1. physicians must be biased because they get big pharma funding-Not all physicians on the planet get pharma dollars. You can actually look up English physicians here abpi.org.uk/reputation/dis… and US physicians here openpaymentsdata.cms.gov . No reason to assume when you can check.
If you still think you don't know your physicians conflicts of interests well enough ask for them during your office visit. You can walk away if you don't like the COIs. Saying most physicians have pharma COI is just factually inaccurate.
Read 30 tweets
Nov 22, 2022
#DiedSuddenlydocumentary #DiedSuddenly #vaccineswork The video is out on rumble and, is essentially a list of people who appeared to have fainted on TV - where the narrator attributes every cause to immunization. Here's the debunk.🧵(1/8)
Sorting out fainting requires a systematic approach from your doc, not a Sherry Tenpenny testimonial. You would expect an architect to systematically figure out why a bridge collapsed. You would expect a car mechanic to systematically figure out why a sound is happening.(2/8)
Same applies to a physician. A physician has never been allowed to declare by royal decree that someone died due to an immunization. A detailed investigation has always been mandatory. Lets look at some of the incorrect attributions they used: (3/8)
Read 16 tweets
Nov 20, 2022
#vaccineswork the Thai Pfizer #vaccination #myocarditis is making the rounds again because it has passed peer review and become a publication... naturally the usual actors are using it to stir up fear again, so lets deep dive into what the study did and its real conclusions.🧵
Two academic Thai hospitals decided to study the potential incidence of postvaccine myocarditis in the prospective fashion in Thai school age children. They studied 301 children, and got EKG/ labs/ echo/ and some cardiac MRIs to look for myocarditis. (2/10)
@P_McCulloughMD chooses to intentionally gloss over the statistical methods of the article by quoting the percentage of cardiovascular manifestations... remember it is very important to try and read beyond only the abstract to see how the number was calculated. (3/10)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(