we've experienced *that* tiresome person—the person who has extremely particular opinions and *rankings* about every single little thing, and who exhibits this snobbery as proof of superior intellect.
@antoniogm wrote (maybe) that he treated people like game entities.
(2/x)
people were more valuable to @antoniogm, or less valuable—that's what Sr. García Martínez said in his book "Chaos Monkeys", anyway...
...maybe. thanks to the practices of #capitalism and publication for profit, the true authorship of any book must always be in some doubt.
(3/x)
human #bigotry is truly mere #snobbery, applied to human beings on specious criteria—mostly to do with personal appearance. dedicated bigots like @charlesmurray, @EPoe187, @SwipeWright, and other such charlatans waste a lot of time on their exact ranking system for people.
(4/x)
bigots like @EPoe187 go to great lengths to pretend that "bigotry" is a meaningless word, a mere insult, but it's simply applied snobbery. there's nothing very much mysterious about bigotry. one may be bigoted about anything—cuisine, music, favorite colors, *anything*.
(5/x)
the difference between snobbery and bigotry is mostly one of *degree*.
snobbery finds expression in the Western system of social dominance—huge volumes of #business and #finance propaganda, and self-help literature from hacks like @jordanbpeterson, talk about dominance.
(6/x)
the snob is someone who regards themselves as better than everyone around them, i.e. they assert their *social dominance* over everyone around them. @mtaibbi, appalling celebrity press flack that he is, really imagines himself to be _superior_ to most people.
(7/x)
@mtaibbi probably even thinks he's the social superior to @elonmusk, even though he's duty-bound to honor Musk's superior social status (and money).
#ElonMusk, faded and ludicrous as he is, still has orders of magnitude more social privilege than Matt Taibbi. however...
(8/x)
...snobbery obeys no rules but its own, and social status is a thing that can rise or fall with extreme rapidity.
@mtaibbi might well get the edge on @elonmusk some day—stranger things have happened.
our partner and best friend @KaylinEvergreen, to whom we feel we owe so much—we've benefited from the keenness of her mind; she "keeps it real" for us, and we *need* such tethering—doesn't like someone we talk frequently about, and that's the Christian celebrity, #CSLewis.
(1/x)
unfortunately, the Pnictogen Wing feels that it's got plenty of unfinished business with C. S. Lewis—"Jack" Lewis, to friends—because Lewis played a pivotal role in our lives. we rebounded from the disastrous 1992-4 mistake that was attending @Caltech towards #CSLewis.
(2/x)
we had caught a lucky break: our very first taste of C. S. Lewis wasn't something obvious. it wasn't the #Narnia books, which we didn't read until our mid-20s. it wasn't "The Screwtape Letters" or "Miracles" or any other of the famed Christian apologetic writings of Lewis.
the last twenty or thirty years have seen a remarkable intellectual phenomenon: #computer technicians, people whose sole area of expertise is computer #programming and #software engineering and other related disciplines, have come to be regarded as "Renaissance Men".
(1/x)
the "#STEM Lord" is an artifact of this phenomenon. while "STEM" is supposed to comprise mathematics and engineering and mathematics, the typical "STEM Lord" is not well-versed in any of these things—the typical "STEM Lord" is in #computers. they are a *technician*.
(2/x)
that is to say, #computer professionals are people with *limited* educations, who are devoted solely to mastering the intricacies of a certain sort of machinery, namely the modern computer.
I have, quite seriously, rarely encountered a wider gap between pretension and reality. even @elonmusk seems more grounded at times.
~Mona
laughter aside...this is a serious issue. @walterkirn and @mtaibbi are but a symptom of a profound *sickness* in Western #journalism, a sickness whose ultimate cause can only be #capitalism—which rewards mediocrity and unfounded egotism in its systems of leadership.
~Mona
Kirn and Taibbi might as well be "Peter Principle" #management and #executive persons—people who have their lofty positions not because of *skill* but superior social privilege, and because they're more ruthless and cynical in their dealings with other people.
of *course* @sama's fake ChatGPT miracle relies upon an army of underpaid workers just out of sight! of _course_ it does! this is the work of modern #programmers, people without any known sense of ethics—and people stupid enough to believe their own lies.
the corporate #AI debacle deserves a proper dissection. the situation is appalling: people like @sama and @demishassabis make promises about their marvellous universal thinking machines that are *just shy* of outright fraud. and they program the machines with their own inanity.
that's the real problem here: @sama and @fchollet and all the other computer technicians who make grandiose promises and proclamations about #AI and "intelligence" are, to put the matter bluntly, completely incompetent at judging *anyone's* intellect, least of all their own.
ah, here it is! we were trying to remember this: the tweet in which @fchollet eloquently demonstrated their incompetence at understanding how perception works, on a fundamental level.
this mountebank thinks that expectation precedes perception.
to put it more bluntly, @fchollet thinks that perceiving things starts with knowing what you want to perceive first. there's a word for this sort of perception: it's called BIAS. Chollet has, in his tweet, described *perceptual bias*: applying filters to one's perceptions.
(2/x)
why would @fchollet make such an elementary blunder? well, likely Chollet (in common with most #computer professionals these days) is hideously biased about most things. the high-tech field, especially in the higher echelons of management, is sodden with bias and bıgotry.
we in the Pnictogen Wing are perhaps nearly alone in thinking that "flat-Earth" people, i.e. human beings who cling to the notion that the Earth is not a spheroid but instead a disc, are not totally pointless.
flat-Earthers are, for most of Western society, safe targets.
(1/x)
for that reason alone, we are drawn to try understanding the phenomenon better, rather than simply discard flat-Earthism and its adherents as worthless and laughable.
what drives a person to endorse such a quixotic worldview, one that insures their permanent ostracism?
(2/x)
there's emotional benefits to belonging in a mostly-despised faction, of course. the faction experiences so much pressure from outside, the society *inside* the bubble is practically forced to be orderly and well-disclipined—a safe haven from an otherwise chaotic world.