#ClimateChange is one of the easiest selling points for your woke politicians to spend money they don’t have on weather problems they can’t fix and keep y’all in a state of fear on an impending doom.
The reality is all those experts, scientists, politicians follow the money
Polluting the environment more than we are generating energy out of them
In the name of #ClimateChange short term thinking politicians are making matters worse by shutting down nuclear power stations and emitting more green house gases than necessary for making the grid reliable.
They build extremely expensive wind farms in the name of #ClimateChange
Then they realize how inefficient and unreliable they are for energy production. Then they secretly start running them on diesel 😂
#ClimateChange is virtue signaling for some and torture for others. Your wealth status defines where you are.
#MichaelBloomberg is virtue signaling about #ClimateChange he isn’t serious about it… if he is he’d be taking public transportation himself stopping his fleet from killing the planet
The same people who advocated for a ban on plastic straws want you to wear a mask. What they won't tell you is that approximately 𝗳𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻 disposable masks have ended up in the ocean thus far, entering our food chain via #microplastics
GREEN ENERGY IS NOT CLEAN ENERGY… IT ALWAYS COMES AT A COST OF POLLUTING THE EARTH. WESTERN CONSUMERS OF #EV MIGHT FEEL GREAT ABOUT THEMSELVES AT THE GRAVE COST OF POLLUTING CHILE 🇨🇱
They scare you with #ClimateChange planet doom and gloom scenarios a plenty from times immemorial.
They wanted you to be afraid in 1974
They wanted you to be afraid in 1984
They wanted you to be afraid in 1994
They wanted you to be afraid in 2004
They wanted you to be afraid in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
If it means more pain to save the planet, are you in 😂
Why not ship all the cows from earth to moon and let them fart there, light the methane gases to shoot cannons to fix #ClimateChange
If they don’t stand to benefit, they wouldn’t care about #ClimateChange
#ClimateChange is a virtue signal
It only applies to you, not to them
Politicians and wealthy elite would rather fly on gas guzzling military planes than take public transportation to save the cost and save the planet.
If you ask them, they say they buy carbon credits to offset the fossil fuel burn… carbon credits is one of the biggest scams… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Burning rainforests for silicon production used in wafers and solar panels isn’t exactly #GreenEnergy
The failure to name, defame, indict, or arrest the clients of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sean "Diddy" Combs, despite their own high-profile arrests, points to a troubling pattern of selective accountability that protects the powerful. This seems to run across party lines, not specific to Democrat or Republican. These individuals operated within elite circles, allegedly facilitating or engaging in egregious acts of exploitation and trafficking, yet the focus remains narrowly on them as individuals rather than the broader networks they served. The clients—often wealthy, influential figures in politics, business, or entertainment—appear shielded by a system that prioritizes discretion over justice. This suggests a deliberate effort to limit exposure, perhaps to avoid destabilizing institutions or reputations tied to these networks. The lack of transparency fuels suspicion that those in power are complicit in preserving a status quo where the elite evade scrutiny, leaving only the orchestrators to face consequences while their patrons remain untouched.
This disparity in accountability undermines public trust in the justice system and perpetuates a culture of impunity for the privileged. If Epstein, Maxwell, and Combs were indeed central to criminal enterprises, their clients were not mere bystanders but active participants who enabled and benefited from these schemes. The absence of indictments or even public naming of these individuals raises questions about whether investigations are intentionally curtailed to protect those with the means to influence outcomes. Systemic barriers, such as sealed records, private settlements, or prosecutorial reluctance to challenge powerful figures, may be at play, ensuring that the client lists remain shrouded in secrecy. By failing to pursue these clients, authorities risk signaling that justice is a privilege reserved for the few, leaving victims without full reckoning and society grappling with the unsettling reality that some are above the law.
A thread on Epstein, Maxwell, Diddy and their criminal elite sex trafficking networks👇
The National Institutes of Health has shut down research labs accused of conducting deadly experiments on thousands of beagles over the past 40+ years.
EACH AND EVERY TIME GOVERNMENT TRIES TO SOLVE A PROBLEM, THEY END UP CREATING MORE
Chaos: Governments, in their attempt to impose order, often create chaos by disrupting established systems. For example, a sudden policy to nationalize industries can lead to mismanagement, supply chain breakdowns, and public unrest as businesses struggle to adapt.
Assault: Governments may use force to enforce laws, sometimes escalating to violence against citizens. For instance, during protests, police deployed by the state might use tear gas or batons, injuring peaceful demonstrators.
Theft: Through taxation or seizure, governments can take property without consent, resembling theft. An example is eminent domain, where a person's home is taken for public projects, often with inadequate compensation.
Extortion: Governments can pressure individuals or businesses for money or compliance under threat of punishment. For example, a small business might face hefty fines or closure unless it pays inflated licensing fees demanded by local officials.
Intimidation: State authorities may intimidate citizens to suppress dissent or enforce compliance. A citizen criticizing government policy online might receive threatening visits from law enforcement, discouraging free speech.
Collusion: Governments can collude with private entities to prioritize elite interests over the public. For instance, a government might award contracts to a favored corporation in exchange for political donations, sidelining fair competition.
Discrimination: Policies may unfairly target or exclude certain groups, fostering inequality. An example is a law banning specific religious practices, disproportionately harming minority communities while favoring others.
Trauma: Government actions, like forced displacements or aggressive policing, can inflict emotional and physical trauma. For example, children separated from parents during immigration enforcement may suffer long-term psychological harm.
Tyranny: Overreaching authority can lead to oppressive rule, stifling freedoms. A government imposing strict curfews and censoring media to control a crisis can erode personal liberties, resembling tyrannical rule.
Death: In extreme cases, government actions result in loss of life. For instance, a poorly planned military operation to address insurgency might lead to civilian casualties due to collateral damage.
In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.
What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.