🪧 Remember #XiJinping encouraging #CCP members/diplomats to show a “fighting spirit" and his repeated emphasis on "being good at struggling"?
What this implies is still being debated in #China.
Below is a 'moderate' take by one of China’s most respected US specialists:
🧵🧵🧵
🔹 Da Wei (达巍) is a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University and the director of its prestigious Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS).
▫️ “The 20th Party Congress demanded that the whole of the Party ‘carry forward its fighting/struggling spirit’ ... It is important to stress that the #communist emphasis on struggle is a #Marxist philosophical concept & must be distinguished from the struggle of everyday life.”
▫️ “#Mao Zedong pointed out that ‘the struggle of opposites is ceaseless, it goes on both when the opposites are coexisting and when they are transforming themselves into each other, and becomes especially conspicuous when they are transforming themselves into one another.'"
▫️ “In other words, contradictions are always present [无时不在] and present everywhere [无所不在]. Struggling is the process by which old contradictions are resolved and new ones arise.”
▫️ “Mao Zedong also pointed out that ‘... we must pay attention to the distinction between the different forms of struggle’, and that ‘antagonism [or ‘confrontation’] is one form, but not the only form, of the struggle of opposites’.”
▫️ “In other words, ‘struggling’ could include both fierce confrontation and other forms such as circumvention [迂回], compromise and cooperation. This is the essence of the Party's repeated emphasis on ‘being good at struggling [善于斗争]’.”
▫️ “In the face of #Washington's fundamental reorientation its strategy towards #China, getting bogged down at the USA-China bilateral level in ‘back-and-forth [你来我往], tooth-for-a-tooth [以牙还牙]’ [exchanges], would not be in keeping with what is required of ‘great powers’.”
📎 In his article, Da Wei continues by arguing that, except for matters that touch upon China’s core interests, Beijing should avoid responding to American provocations in a tit for tat way and should focus its efforts on building bridges with the #USA and the rest of the world.
📣 For more on this and other topics as viewed by Chinese scholars and think-tank analysts:
🔹The author: Yang is the head of the highly regarded Beijing Cultural Review (BCR). He is also the director of the Longway Foundation which publishes BCR. The foundation describes its publication as “the most influential magazine of intellectual thought and commentary in China”.
▫️ Yang’s views in a nutshell:
1⃣ “Capitalist politics” are no longer in line with “capitalist economics”. The former now undermines globalisation, while the latter supports it.
▫️ “When it comes to international political risks, the US's domestic problems have to be placed at the top of the list ... the US’s internal divisions produce huge externalities that have far-reaching effects on world politics.”
▫️ "So, will a transfer [of the US’s domestic tensions] occur at the military level? This is even more worrying. Countries must guard themselves against this [各国不可不防]."
"#RishiSunak has now become the representative of 🇬🇧's hardliners on #China. We cannot expect him to become a moderate on China again after becoming PM."
🔹 Author: Xu Ruike (徐瑞珂) – Prof. at Beijing Foreign Studies University.
▫️ "Under Sunak, the 'Americanisation' of Britain's China policy will remain evident ... Economics will take a back seat. Suspicion and hostility towards China will gradually become the defining theme of Sino-British relations."
▫️ "The right-wing forces of the Conservative backbenchers represented by @aliciakearns and @MPIainDS will exert significant influence on Downing Street's China policy."
“The US's incremental adjustments allow resources to continue to be channelled into 🇨🇳 through ‘third countries’, ‘detours’ or even ‘transfers’, thereby allowing 🇨🇳 to make adjustments and repairs to its supply chains.” – Ma Xue, CICIR analyst.
“The US does not have a complete monopoly on cutting-edge research ... This means that unilateral US controls are often ineffective and the paths for technology transfers to #China are difficult to block."
"Political controls placed on strategic industries will undermine 🇺🇸's future tech competitiveness. US export controls, entity lists and other similar restrictions have reduced the sales of US companies to 🇨🇳 and [thus] reduced the revenues that can then be reinvested in R&D."
This is how Scholz's visit to 🇨🇳 + COSCO deal is being interpreted in China:
"[COSCO's acquisition] underlines that German Chancellor Scholz is still relatively steady and pragmatic vis-à-vis developing relations with China." – Wu Huiping, Centre for 🇩🇪 Studies at Tongji Univ.
"Scholz is also sending a certain message to those within Germany, that is: although the Greens are currently running the country’s foreign ministry, Germany’s most important foreign policy-making power still lies in the hands of the chancellor." – Wu Huiping
“Scholz's upcoming visit to 🇨🇳 is a sign of 🇩🇪's strong desire to encourage the further development of 🇨🇳-🇩🇪 cooperation at an important point in time – right after the 20th Party Congress and just as Chinese-style modernisation is embarking on a new journey.” – Tian Dewen, CASS