2/ #WHO is working on two agreements that will expand its powers & role in declared health emergencies & pandemics. These include widening the definition of ‘health emergencies’ within which such powers may be used.
3/ The #IHR amendment process in WHO is relatively transparent. Amendments are proposed by national bureaucracies & collated by WHO. WHO has gone to unusual lengths to open hearings to public submissions.
4/ However, these amendments will change the relationship between people, their governments & WHO. WHO's rights would override individuals' rights, erasing principles developed post-WW2 regarding human rights & state sovereignty.
5/ Proposals would allow the WHO DG to make decisions, consulting a committee but not bound by it - as when declaring monkeypox a #PHIEC after 5 deaths globally, against committee advice.
6/ WHO proposes that the underlying #equality of individuals is removed, and rights become subject to a status determined by others based on a set of criteria they define.
7/ This is a #totalitarian approach to society, a feudal relationship, or one of the monarch-subjects without an intervening constitution.
8/ WHO would have authority over member states by changing the definition of 'recommendations' from 'non-binding' to 'binding' in a statement that states will undertake to follow, rather than 'consider', WHO recommendations.
9/ Powers ceded by governments to the WHO DG include specifics requiring changes within legal systems, including detention, travel restrictions, forced health interventions & requirements to undergo medical examinations.
10/ Proposed restrictions on individual rights include freedom of speech. WHO's powers could designate opinions or information as 'misinformation' or 'disinformation', & require governments to intervene and stop dissemination. pandata.org/who-is-watchin…
11/ Countries to cede power over patent law and IP to WHO, including control of manufacturing know-how of commodities that the WHO DG considers relevant to the potential or actual health problem deemed of interest.
12/ #Surveillance mechanisms required & expanded within the WHO ensure a stream of potential public health risks. In each case, the WHO DG will have the power to declare such events a health emergency of international or regional concern.
13/ If these amendments are accepted, the people taking control over the lives of others will have no real legal oversight as they have #diplomaticimmunity from all national jurisdictions.
14/ The proposed powers sought by the WHO & the developing pandemic preparedness industry aren't hidden, making the lack of push-back by politicians, lack of concern in the media & consequent ignorance of the public strange & alarming. pandata.org/whos-driving-t…
16/ Support PANDA's independent research and insight on the drivers behind recent key global events, with a special focus on the emerging Pandemic Preparedness industry: bit.ly/SupportPANDA
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the second time, South Africa identifies a new ‘variant’. For the second time it reaps the same reward: stigmatization, isolation and more decimation of its fragile tourism industry. 1/
Already on its knees after almost two years of one of the harshest and most pointless lockdowns in the world, the South African economy stands on the brink.
For what? Viruses mutate. When they mutate into a more transmissible form, that form dominates. 2/
The Delta ‘variant’ quickly supplanted other circulating variants globally, despite all attempts to slow its spread.
SARS-CoV-2 is endemic and will mutate forever, the prevailing variant at any given time will, by definition, be the most transmissible. 3/
The severity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 is so skewed towards those with identifiable risk factors that it should have been an ideal candidate for a focused protection approach, prophylaxis and early treatment to the high risk-group. Instead targeted treatments have been shunned.
Proven safe and therapeutic candidate treatments were ignored, often suppressed or negatively portrayed in the press rather than urgently investigated. The response poured billions of dollars into ventilators and new drugs but spent nothing on research using existing drugs.
COVID-19 presents a high risk of illness and death to a few and a negligible risk to the majority. The median age of death with COVID-19 is similar to that of natural mortality in most countries. 95% of deaths occur in individuals with 1 or more existing health problems.
Safe and efficacious vaccines should be offered to high-risk individuals (mostly people above 50, with other health problems) when the benefit of the intervention clearly outweighs the risk. This strategy achieves the best outcome for all.
As a number of countries seek to focus the discussion on further coercive measures and even mandatory vaccination, PANDA is increasingly aware of the elephants in the room, the topics no one is talking about.
Let's not lose sight of the big picture. pandata.org/elephants-in-t…
This article was first published on Conservative Woman here:
PANDA opposes "universal mask mandates". The benefit of mask wearing in healthy individuals has not been demonstrated and the harms are great, especially to our children.