Post

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1633174565470760961

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1635756092750692364

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1273022790334124034

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

https://twitter.com/gaborgurbacs/status/1637522483476680710

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1577370291382386688

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/1549415901631598593

https://twitter.com/ercwl/status/1637573829642862595

More from @DeepBlueCrypto

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Jan 29

The time has come for the UK government to reclaim sovereignty over its borders and protect its citizens by decisively repealing the Human Rights Act and withdrawing from the Refugee Convention. For too long, these outdated frameworks have handcuffed our ability to deport dangerous individuals who exploit the asylum system, leading to a surge in abuse, rapes, and violence perpetrated by immigrants who refuse to assimilate into British society. High-profile cases, such as the Ethiopian asylum seeker charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in Epping just days after arrival, or the Sudanese migrant convicted of attempting to rape a woman in Wakefield, illustrate the grim reality. With over 200 asylum hotel residents charged with violent and sexual offences in 2025 alone, including multiple rapes, it's clear that the current system prioritizes the rights of foreign criminals over the safety of British families. Repealing these acts would empower swift removals, deter exploitation, and restore public trust in a immigration policy that puts Britain first.

By leaving the Refugee Convention and scrapping the Human Rights Act, we can end the cycle of unchecked migration that has brought chaos to our streets and communities. Immigrants who fail to integrate often form isolated enclaves where criminality festers, as evidenced by reports of arson, theft, and assaults linked to asylum accommodations. The government's own data reveals thousands of assaults and hate crimes within these facilities, but the real victims are ordinary Britons facing elevated risks from those who game the system. A bold exit from these international obligations would allow us to craft bespoke laws that prioritize assimilation, rapid deportation of offenders, and the protection of our values—ensuring a safer, more cohesive United Kingdom for generations to come.

A thread on failed Britain and EU👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2013780667612418498

Here’s a previous thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2013780667612418498

THESE ATROCITIES MUST STOP

BRITAIN MUST SECURE ITS BORDERS AND STOP THE MASS IMMIGRATION MADNESS

In a deeply disturbing case at Warwick Crown Court, a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, was allegedly targeted and raped last July by two asylum seekers, 23-year-old Ahmad Mulakhil and 24-year-old Mohammad Kabir, after they pursued her while she played in a park. The prosecution detailed how Kabir first grabbed and attempted to strangle the visibly young child, trying to force her away, before she escaped—only to later encounter Mulakhil, who led her to a secluded cul-de-sac, where he orally raped her, committed further sexual assaults, took indecent photos, laughed during the attack, and threatened to kill her family if she spoke out. DNA evidence from Mulakhil was found on her, and while he admits to the oral rape, he implausibly claims she consented and appeared in her twenties—a notion dismissed given her childlike appearance. This brutal assault, marked by the perpetrators' callous disregard for her age and vulnerability, exposes the perilous risks of unchecked mass immigration, demanding immediate action: the UK must halt the influx of unvetted asylum seekers and secure its borders to prevent such atrocities and protect its citizens from predatory threats.

Read 27 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Jan 25

Across the United States, an intricate web of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), daycares, autism treatment centers, transportation services, and related facilities has been uncovered in schemes that systematically divert billions in taxpayer dollars intended for child nutrition and care programs. Originating prominently in Minnesota with cases like the Feeding Our Future scandal, this network expanded to involve similar operations in states such as Washington, New York, and California. These entities often pose as legitimate providers for underserved communities, particularly immigrant groups, but exploit federal and state funding streams by fabricating enrollment numbers, inventing fictitious meal services, and establishing shell companies to funnel money. The scale of the fraud has grown to encompass COVID-19 relief funds, leading to federal indictments of dozens of individuals and the recovery of luxury assets purchased with ill-gotten gains.

The mechanics of this money laundering involve sophisticated tactics to steal public funds while maintaining a facade of charitable work. Operators submit inflated reimbursement claims to government programs, claiming to serve thousands of children daily when in reality, facilities may be empty or non-existent. Funds are then cycled through a series of interconnected NGOs and businesses, often involving wire transfers to overseas accounts or investments in real estate and vehicles. In Minnesota alone, prosecutors have described this as the largest pandemic-related fraud in the country, with over $250 million siphoned off initially, ballooning to estimates of up to $9 billion when including related schemes. This laundering not only depletes resources meant for vulnerable families but also undermines trust in social safety nets, as audits reveal minimal oversight allowed the fraud to persist for years.

Enabling this widespread theft are allegations of political complicity, where elected officials in affected states—predominantly Democratic-led—have benefited from campaign contributions tied to fraud perpetrators, potentially influencing lax regulations and delayed investigations. Reports indicate over $50,000 in donations from indicted individuals to Minnesota Democrats, including figures like the state attorney general, raising questions about kickbacks disguised as legitimate political support. This symbiotic relationship allows the network to thrive, as politicians secure election funds while turning a blind eye to red flags, prompting federal interventions like funding freezes across multiple states to curb the abuse. While some claims of direct kickbacks remain unproven, the pattern suggests a cycle of corruption that prioritizes personal and party gains over taxpayer accountability.

A thread on NGO fraud waste and abuse👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2012301704381743455

Here’s a previous thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2012301704381743455

A Somalian Democrat in Maine started a money transfer business

- He then bought a commercial real estate building
- In it there are 4 Medicaid funded home health care businesses
- Large bags of cash are being seen sent from it headed to Somalia

Read 18 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Jan 5

The amount of fraud, waste and abuse happening at most of the Democrat states is jaw dropping

The staggering amount of fraud perpetrated on the tax payers money funneling through NGOs and other organizations is pathetic

A thread on NGOs, fraud, waste & abuse👇

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2005803561959985450

Here’s a previous thread

https://twitter.com/deepbluecrypto/status/2005803561959985450

Minneapolis sent $12 million in federal meal funds to a Somali restaurant claiming to feed 4,000–6,000 kids daily.

The FBI watched them for six weeks—about 40 people showed up.

That’s how normalized corruption looks.

And if you ask any questions… they’ll find ways to skip

Read 44 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Dec 27, 2025

CENSORSHIP IS NEVER A GOOD THING

FREE SPEECH IS VITAL TO PRESERVING PEOPLES FREEDOMS AND THEIR RIGHTS TO DISAGREE

IF BUREAUCRATIC GOVERNMENTS CAN DECIDE WHAT THE TRUTH IS & WHAT NEEDS TO BE CENSORED… IT ALWAYS ENDS UP IN TYRANNY

A 🧵 on Europe & EU👇

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/2001667228014461403

Here’s a previous thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/2001667228014461403

In a country like Germany 🇩🇪… if they import a few million more immigrants from third world countries, the country is dead from the inside

Read 62 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Dec 13, 2025

Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.

Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.

A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1994500059514507358

Here’s a previous thread

https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1994500059514507358

Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.

In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.

Read 43 tweets

🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@DeepBlueCrypto

Dec 10, 2025

Trump unloads on Europe's immigration mess—in his own words:

"Most European nations... they’re decaying. They’re decaying."

"Poland has done a very good job... but they want to be so politically correct, and it makes them weak. That’s what makes them weak."

On Sweden: "Sweden was known as the safest country in Europe... Now it’s known as very unsafe—well, pretty unsafe country. It’s not even believable."

London's mayor? "He’s a horrible mayor. He’s an incompetent mayor... a horrible, vicious, disgusting mayor."

H/t: @newstart_2024

A thread on failing Europe & EU👇