ASG: The aim here is you are entitled to do what you want. Let everyone join and let knowlege be shared. But if national integrity is affected we will step in.
HC records: ASG submits that Doctrine of Proportionality has undergone lot of change with societal value. Doctrine cannot be invoked as straight jacket formula. He relies on an English court judgment wherein the absolute closure of account has been upheld.
HC: ASG also referes to apex court judgment in Anuradha Bhasin wherein the said doctrine having been treated in the light of K Puttaswamy judgment and denied relief to petitioner
@facebook@Twitter ASG: I read this only to show that even SC felt that originator should be identified...Sovereignty and integrity of India should be protected and thus some process should be formulated to identify the account holders
@facebook@Twitter ASG: When I say your account holder is committing an offence he falls back on Rule 16. His ultimate object is that I have fundamental right. Next is 69 A and rules, there his case goes.
@facebook@Twitter ASG: To summarise my argument, they are not entitled to any relief, they are a foreign entity. My request is they are not entitle for any relief.
Govt of India and #Delhi Govt cannot hide behind the veil of corporate personality especially when it comes to the discharge of binding obligations owed by the DMRC: Delhi High Court on payment of dues of an arbitral award to Reliance Infrastructure-owned DAMEPL. #DelhiMetro
In any case public policy demands that the veil be lifted and they be commanded to take appropriate steps to enable the DMRC to meet the obligations flowing from the award: Delhi High Court #DelhiMetro
The two shareholders are not mere individuals having a business interest in a corporate venture but sovereign governments in their own right. Governments cannot shirk from their liability to abide by binding judgments, decrees and awards: Delhi High Court
CJI DY Chandrachud: Where a state has more than one petitions, it would be open for the state to file one common petition. Time for filing of counter affidavit shall stand extended to three weeks.
Counsel: Your lordships may fix a date for completion of proceedings. Other states such as Maharashtra are trying to hop on the bandwagon- they're having daily processions for love jihad and what not. They're putting pressure.
#SupremeCourt hears Advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay's challenge to bail granted to Videocon Group Venugopal Dhoot. The Bombay HC had earlier rejected his intervention application and imposed cost on him.
CJI DY Chandrachud: How can you intervene in a bail application?
Counsel: Locus standi is foreign to criminal jurisprudence.
CJI DY Chandrachud: No but you're an advocate. How can you intervene? State can. If we entertain you, whole world will come to intervene in bail cases.
SG Tushar Mehta: We have moved an IA. There's 23,000 crores in the Sebi - Sahara account. IA seeks a prayer , from that account to have Rs 5000 crores moved to Central Registrar Co-operatives Society. We can utilise amounts which are lying idle.
Bench: In Sahara, there's a serious dispute...
SG: The society will check the genuineness of the depositor.
Bench: Where's the IA?
SG: Physical copy is not there. We had a meeting with all the departments and took this decision.
DMRC - Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited Dispute - Delhi High Court Directs Centre, Delhi Govt to forthwith attend to DMRC's request for extension of sovereign guarantee/ subordinate debt to enable it make payment of dues to Reliance Infra-owned DAMEPL.
Justice Yashwant Varma: The decision be taken within two weeks. If permission be accorded to the DMRC, it shall proceed to deposit the entire amount payable under the 2017 award along with the interest within a period of one month.
Justice Varma: If the Union or Delhi government decline the request, the union ministry shall forthwith revert and repatriate all monies received by it from DMRC post 10-03-2022. Upon receipt of the money, #DMRC shall transfer DAMEPL's dues to it.