This is visual demonstration how SITU model misrepresented wound locations specified in forensic reports to falsely frame Berkut as killers & whitewash Maidan snipers in buildings. SITU fraud was propagated by @NYT & even some academics. Maidan trial didn't admit it as evidence.
https://twitter.com/CL4Syr/status/1637957922364825601
@NYT This visual demonstration corroborates my research showing SITU model's misrepresentation of wound locations specified in forensic reports to frame Berkut as killers & whitewash Maidan snipers. But SITU fraud is still propagated by Western journalists. consortiumnews.com/2019/04/22/the…
.
.
This fake 3D model was publicized by @nytimes
& many other media even though actual wound locations of 3 killed protesters are precisely shown by forensic medical examinations, Maidan massacre trial, videos & bullet holes in shields & helmet & my video
& many other media even though actual wound locations of 3 killed protesters are precisely shown by forensic medical examinations, Maidan massacre trial, videos & bullet holes in shields & helmet & my video
Even SITU Research head admitted that contrary to his Maidan massacre model “there is a consensus that there was a third party acting, “it is clear from forensic evidence that people were shot in the back” & “somebody was shooting from rooftops.” #Ukraine
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
