2/ I'd say the joint statement on commercial #spyware is unprecedented.
A few years ago spyware like #Pegasus was was treated as a human rights issue.
But the dizzying speed of proliferation made big problems for governments, forcing them to prepare positions & action.
3/ The statement's commitment guardrails for accountable domestic #spyware use is important.
But devil will be in the implementations. Civil society will be watching.
(Note: issue wasn't covered in White House Spyware Executive Order on Monday, so nice to see USA commit here)
4/ Export control commitments on #Spyware. Again, important.
Worth noting, several signatories have a complex history on surveillance tech export...
So transparency about license granting & denials will be essential for accountability & to ensure commitment has teeth.
5/ Tracking & information sharing. Maybe public shaming? Norms? Again, important.
The mercenary #spyware industry has hidden from researchers & victims.
Let's hope it's harder for them to hide from governments.
6/ Commercial #spyware proliferation is now a global problem. Whether it's sold to autocrats, or to more 'democratic' governments in the EU... that wind up abusing it
But a key driver? Investment firms in the US & elsewhere. Good to see the joint statement speak to this.
8/ Spyware proliferation went too far & did too much harm.
Result? Governments are waking up & have started taking action.
But this is also a reminder of all the progress still needed on many fronts, like domestic accountability, oversight & transparency from every signatory.
9/ It remains puzzling to me as I read the joint statement on #Spyware that some EU countries are notably missing (where is #Germany?).
It also puts into stark relief that the EU Parliament's efforts on Spyware have a long way to go.
I hope there is some pressure to catch up!
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WHOA: Predator spyware discovered in π΅π°#Pakistan.
+ a leak shows zero-click infections via... ads.
Yikes.
Here are some more damming revelations as Intellexa, the shady, sanctioned spyware supplier gets exposed by @AmnestyTech & partners.. /1
2/ First, a mercenary spyware myth has just been busted.
Because the leak shows an Intellexa employee directly accessing a customer deployment.
Prior to the #PredatorFiles leak, spyware companies basically always claimed they couldn't access customer deployments & didn't know what was going on there.
They used this to avoid responsibility & claim ignorance when faced with abuses.
3/ And it gets crazier. The leak shows Intellexa casually accessing a core backbone of Predator deployment of a government customer.
Seemingly without the gov's knowledge.
Suggests that Intellexa can look over their shoulder & watch their sensitive targeting.
NEW: π¨π³Chinese hackers ran massive campaign by tricking Claude's agentic AI.
Vibe hacking ran 80-90% of the operation without humans.
Massive scale (1000s of reqs/sec).
Agents ran complex multi-step tasks, shepherded by a human.
Long predicted. Welcome to the new world.
Fascinating report by @AnthropicAI 1/
2/ The old cybersecurity pitch: unpatched systems are the threat.
The next generation concern might be unpatched cognition.
The attacker jailbroke the cognitive layer of @anthropic's Claude code, successfully convincing the system of false intent (that it was a security exercise)
3/ One of the key points in @AnthropicAI's report is just how limited the human time required was to run such a large automated campaign.
Obviously powerful stuff, highlighting the impact of orchestration.
And concerning for the #cybersecurity world for all sorts of reasons, ranging from attack scale, adaptability & cost reductions...
A "damaging" leak of tools from a five eyes exploit developer?
Concerning. We need to know what's under this rug.
Big picture: "trusted, vetted" private sector players offensive cyber are not immune to losing control of tooling... with national security consequences 1/
2/ If true, a tooling leak at boutique firm Trenchant wouldn't be the first time that exploits from commercial offensive vendors wind up... in the wrong place.
Many questions.
In the meantime. Remember when Russian APT29..was caught with exploits first used by NSO & Intellexa?
3/ There will always be a push for states to turn towards the private sector to meet offensive needs.
It's appealing. For some, it's very lucrative.
But in practice it brings unavoidable counterintelligence & national security downside risk that shouldn't be downplayed.