2/ I'd say the joint statement on commercial #spyware is unprecedented.
A few years ago spyware like #Pegasus was was treated as a human rights issue.
But the dizzying speed of proliferation made big problems for governments, forcing them to prepare positions & action.
3/ The statement's commitment guardrails for accountable domestic #spyware use is important.
But devil will be in the implementations. Civil society will be watching.
(Note: issue wasn't covered in White House Spyware Executive Order on Monday, so nice to see USA commit here)
4/ Export control commitments on #Spyware. Again, important.
Worth noting, several signatories have a complex history on surveillance tech export...
So transparency about license granting & denials will be essential for accountability & to ensure commitment has teeth.
5/ Tracking & information sharing. Maybe public shaming? Norms? Again, important.
The mercenary #spyware industry has hidden from researchers & victims.
Let's hope it's harder for them to hide from governments.
6/ Commercial #spyware proliferation is now a global problem. Whether it's sold to autocrats, or to more 'democratic' governments in the EU... that wind up abusing it
But a key driver? Investment firms in the US & elsewhere. Good to see the joint statement speak to this.
8/ Spyware proliferation went too far & did too much harm.
Result? Governments are waking up & have started taking action.
But this is also a reminder of all the progress still needed on many fronts, like domestic accountability, oversight & transparency from every signatory.
9/ It remains puzzling to me as I read the joint statement on #Spyware that some EU countries are notably missing (where is #Germany?).
It also puts into stark relief that the EU Parliament's efforts on Spyware have a long way to go.
I hope there is some pressure to catch up!
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Be wary of OSINT-branded accounts recycling faked & old footage of airstrikes, explosions, interceptions etc.
It happens every time, but in New Twitter they have a direct financial incentive to push out inflammatory nonsense.
There's more 1/
2/ The annoying practice of some OSINT-branded accounts of repeating headlines ginned up & borrowed from somewhere without citation as if it's their own...
Is reckless & dangerous during fast moving conflict where there is huge potential for *consequential* misunderstandings.
3/ Exercise extreme caution in what you amplify & believe.
Twitter is awash with a flood tide of falsehoods tonight.
Some is the work of people trying to farm revenue.
And some is disinformation seeking to seed specific false perceptions.