Thread by @IronNCopper

1/ THREAD

#NCI's Winnipeg hearings kick start with a detailed review of the Pfizer docs by Canadian immunologist and researcher Jessica Rose.

@Inquiry_Canada
@JesslovesMJK

2/

Ms. Rose being sworn in.

3/

Ms. Rose's bonafides.

4/

No stranger to attacks by the legacy media, Ms. Rose has these words for @Reuters.

Rose: "Whenever these kind of things happens, it usually means that you're over the target."

5/

Ms. Rose on the consequences of an accelerated clinic trial testing phase.

Rose: "Genuine safety testing was impossible. That is a fact."

6/

Ms. Rose makes a shocking statement that most people simply were unaware of.

Rose: "The placebo participants were injected with the product. So they were intentionally lost."

7/

Ms. Rose refutes the possibility of people having given informed consent.

Rose: "I really would like to know how many people, of the billions injected with these products, knew that they were being injected with something that wasn't a traditional vaccine."

8/

Ms. Rose claims that as early as one month after vaccine rollout there was enough information to withdraw the vaccine.

Rose: "We had 90,000 entries in VAERS, and almost 700 deaths. So what's the cutoff for the number of people allowed to die?"

9/

Ms. Rose makes a bold suggestion that the pharmaceutical companies most probably would not like.

Rose: "Since they're not using VAERS as a pharmacovigilant tool, then it only seems fair that the immunity from liability also be removed."

10/

Ms. Rose then shows what can only be described as a 'hockey stick' curve of adverse events reports.

Rose: "You just can't look away from this. It has to be addressed in some way."

11/

Ms. Rose explains how the #mRNA technology would be useless without the highly toxic lipid nanoparticle technology. She finds it very convenient, then, that both @pfizer and @moderna_tx managed to remove the toxicity of the lipids just in time for the vaccine rollout.

12/

Ms. Rose stresses that the vaccine mRNA, unlike the cellular mRNA, was designed in such a way as to evade the immune system.

Rose: "The bottom line here is that these things were designed to be very stable, and very durable, and long lasting."

13/

Ms. Rose masterfully makes the case that the mRNA is being trafficked to the liver, where it is being translated into spike protein, which then binds to the Ace2 protein and effects manifest as seemingly unrelated symptoms (ie. myocarditis, blood clotting, etc.)

14/

Ms. Rose suggests that the reason for the large range of types of adverse events associated with the #covid19 #vaccine is somehow related to the liver.

Rose: "This is evidence that there's something very different about these shots."

15/

Ms. Rose does a fantastic job explaining how a chain, or 'peptide' of the spike protein might be depositing collagen in the veins and thus may be responsible for the strange materials embalmers are pulling out of bodies.

16/

Ms. Rose recounts an infuriating story where she, along with @P_McCulloughMD were silenced, such that the FDA could approve the vaccine for use on children.

Rose: "People didn't have the opportunity to read this material and make their own damn mind up. That's criminal!"

17/

Ms. Rose may be the only doctor to explain for the lay person what 'myocarditis' is.

Rose: "It's basically a general, descriptive term for inflammation of the myocardium, which is the middle, muscly layer of the heart which allows it to beat."

18/

Ms. Rose's brilliant response to the question of studies showing benefits of the vaccine.

Rose: "The studies don't show that at all. More people are showing up in the hospital and dying in the group that were injected."

19/

The commissioner then asks Ms. Rose why the toxicity of the spike protein was dismissed early on.

Rose: "I dare say that there's a lot that they knew, and they're obfuscating from the public because it would be bad for the program."

20/

The commissioner asks Ms. Rose to distinguish between the #COVID19 spike protein and the vaccine spike protein.

Rose: "It's the scale. the transfection technology is designed to make MASSIVE amounts of spike proteins."

21/

Ms. Rose is asked to compare the US VAERS system to the Canadian CAEFISS system.

Rose: "From what I understand it was far worse in Canada."

22/

The commissioner asks Ms. Rose to speculate as to how the lack of quality control resulted in the 15,000 types of adverse events.

Rose [1/5]: "There are so many factors that could lend to the outcome, the predictability is absolutely, almost zero."

23/

First, Ms. Rose claims that the lack of aspiration could be one reason for the large types of adverse events.

Rose [2/5]: "The CDC was actually actually recommending not to aspirate, and I can't figure out why they would have been doing that."

24/

Next, Ms. Rose claims that the structure of the lipid nanoparticle could be another reason for the large types of adverse events.

Rose: [3/5]: "The polyethylene glycol is the molecule that coats the liquid nano particle into a ball so it can traffic to wherever it's going."

25/

Ms. Rose then talks to the contamination of double stranded DNA in vials which should only have single stranded RNA.

Rose [4/5]: "It's expensive to do this. It's possible the mRNA wasn't purified properly."

26/

Finally Ms. Rose does a 180 and suggests that the best case scenario might be the worst.

Rose [5/5]: "Even if everything was done perfectly, this is probably the worst case scenario because the spike gets trafficked to the nucleus."

27/

The commissioner then asks Ms. Rose to comment on the impact on the human genome.

Rose: "I think the potential is there. The proof is not there yet, but I have no doubt in my mind that this paper is on the way."

28/

The commissioner then asks Ms. Rose about her thoughts on VAERS.

Rose: "It's absolutely ludicrous for anybody to claim that if you have half of deaths being reported within 48 hours of injection that there's no causal effect. COME ON!"

Full video: rumble.com/v2i1s5y-dr.-je…