1/14 BREAKING -The European Commission just published a draft #taxonomy's delegated act for biodiversity - i.e. its list of the economic activities that fight biodiversity loss in the EU - that includes debunked #biodiversity #offsetting Image
2/14 The list includes so far 2 activities, with more to come in the future:
1. Conservation and restoration of habitats, ecosystems and species;
2. The provision of short-term tourism accommodation
3/14 We first note that the conservation & restoration activity does not prioritize curbing destruction over restoration, thereby implicitly favouring the latter, despite its uncertain & delayed results and weak track record
4/14 Most crucially, the draft includes the following:
"Additional minimum requirements
6.1 The conservation activity does NOT ONLY serve the purpose of #offsetting the impact of another economic activity"
5/14 We understand it to mean that #biodiversity #offsetting is included in the taxonomy, despite its documented environmental integrity issues & appalling track record.
This means that it will be included in green bonds, sustainable finance retail savings products & indices
6/14 Thereby legitimizing it and generating tremendous demand for this false solution to biodiversity loss, with the environmental and social consequences that we know.
7/14 The draft also states that managements plans must include "where applicable, a description of enhanced ecosystem services, such as carbon storage, water purification, flood protection, pollination, recreational opportunities, and wider socio-economic benefits."
8/14 Given the political context where the UK govt recently announced the launch of 4 nature markets on biodiversity offsetting, carbon storage, water purification and flood prevention, and where UK is starting to partner with France on nature markets, one might wonder...
9/14 ...whether this information request will pave the way for future multiple nature markets similar to the UK, that will privatize and assetize water purification & flood prevention.
10/14 As for the second activity listed, it is the provision of short term tourism accomodation that contribute substantially to conservation or restoration activities, either financially or in kind.
Possible contributions include:
- paying visits to conservation areas
11/14 - the purchase of food, beverages, handcrafts or merchandises from a conservation area where 1% of the annual turnover of the tourist establishment is paid to conservation activities, or only 0.5% if the agreement is for a group > 10 establishments
12/14 Note that the establishment must be awarded with an EU Ecolabel for tourist accommodation & have "at least 40% of food and beverages, wood (...), paper and cardboard products, by procurement value, certified according to environmental standards" (what about the 60%?)
13/14 Hotels and motels of all kinds with or without services such as swimming pool, holiday homes & fishing and hunting camps are included. Only cruise ships are excluded.
14/14 A public consultation is open for 4 weeks if you want to have your say
ec.europa.eu/info/law/bette…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Green Finance Observatory

Green Finance Observatory Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @greenfinanceobs

Dec 5, 2022
Beware the disingenuous narrative from #biodiversity financiers ahead of #COP15. It goes like this:
1. We need to integrate #nature into our economies to protect it (except no one has ever demonstrated that we do, & history of conservation shows that we don’t) 1/6
2. Markets on nature are happening anyway, we just need to ensure good governance (they are not happening anyway, private lobbies are actively promoting them, and their conceptual issues go way beyond governance) 2/6
greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/upl…
In fact, off the record most financiers, environmental & policy experts agree that they will most probably be an environmental failure and a political success, just like carbon offsets, i.e. they will buy time to continue maximising growth 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9, 2022
BREAKING!
A UK lobby coalition just published a report for the creation of markets for #nature, on #habitats for wildlife, #carbon sequestration, #nutrient reduction credits trading aka #water pollution trading, #air pollution and #flood mitigation. 1/6
irp.cdn-website.com/82b242bb/files…
"I look forward to working with the Coalition to make these markets a reality" said British MP Helen Whately, exchequer secretary to the Treasury. The UK govt has indeed committed to working with this coalition to scale up environmental mkts in the UK
carbon-pulse.com/162013/?utm_so…
2/6
This news follows the recent UK government announcement of the creation of a wetland ‘super reserve’ in the south west of England containing 11 Mt of #carbon in storage 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Mar 29, 2022
BREAKING! The European Commission just confirmed that it promotes "like for like or better" #biodiversity #offsetting, as part of #NatureBasedSolutions!
Why is it major news? Thread 1/11
europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document…
Under this approach, the destruction of a habitat for flamingos in Spain could be considered to be offset by the restoration of a habitat for bats in Greece, as long as you claim that it is "better." 2/11
Beyond its obvious lack of environmental integrity, this approach will also enable the financialisation of biodiversity destruction through the creation of a related #offset market, and shift the conversation away from the need to curb destruction: 3/11
Read 11 tweets
Jun 22, 2021
1/5 New @IPBES @IPCC report promotes #NatureBasedSolutions, carbon and biodiversity #offsetting and #InclusiveWealth, the new neoliberal metric putting a price on nature and human life, but framed as a sustainable metric complementing GDP.

#Dasgupta
ipbes.net/sites/default/… Image
2/5 "Where #NatureBasedSolutions are used as
carbon #offsets, they are most effective when applied
subject to strict conditions and exclusions"
=> In case anyone had any doubt left that #NatureBasedSolutions included offsetting
3/5 "For #biodiversity, the concept of #offsets, the substitutability among a slate of possible actions, can introduce the flexibility required to achieve multiple competing objectives at regional scale, if applied subject to strict conditions & exclusions"
Read 5 tweets
Mar 19, 2021
Are #NatureBasedSolutions part of the solution or part of the pb?
While the concept was originally interesting there is growing evidence that it has been hijacked by the proponents of neoliberal financialisation of nature aka #naturalcapital & offsetting.
Below are 6 exhibits 1/7
2/7
Resolution 059 of the 2016 IUCN World Conservation Congress that defined NbS stated 'it is IUCN’s position that biodiversity offsets can contribute to positive conservation outcomes (...) it could be appropriate for the offset to conserve a different kind of biodiversity'
3/7
The list of contributions received under the 2019 UN #NatureBasedSolutions for Climate Manifesto includes projects promoting REDD, REDD+, carbon offset credits, and calling for the inclusion of Nature-Based Solutions in carbon markets.
greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/upl…
Read 7 tweets
Sep 8, 2020
1/11 CBD Post-2020 biodiversity framework: the updated zero draft unfortunately seems to confirm a strong focus on doomed financialization and market-based approaches to biodiversity.
#naturalcapital #offsetting
cbd.int/doc/c/3064/749…
2/11 the draft calls to value biodiversity and ecosystem services and "internalize the value of nature."
It also calls for “net improvements by 2050,” “net” being usually the codeword for offsetting, as is the case with Net Zero emission targets & No Net Loss / Net Gain policies.
3/11 The 20 action-oriented targets for 2030 raise serious concerns and questions:
- Does target 1 calling to restore X% of degraded freshwater and marine ecosystems mean to include water quality trading (a market for tradable credits to pollute rivers and other waterways)?
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(