Supreme Court to shortly hear a batch of cases highlighting inaction by states in acting against instances of hate speech made against Muslims and Christians.
Court: When Pasha came on Thursday, he didn’t ask for action against person from the Muslim community.. we said it should be irrespective of community. There is complaint that this great country which we are home to..
SG: In one petition, notice is issued we are receiving IA after IA.. there are judgements that when a direct prayer for registration of FIR.. There is a remedy provided.
Court: Does anyone have any issue with our interim order? As guardians of law and order, the police should take action we say. Can court take cognisance without sanction? No. We are conscious of that. For preliminary investigation, I don’t think sanction is required.
Court: We only have public good in mind.
SG: We share that sentiment. But there has to be a line. There cannot be 500 IAs.
Petitioners: Lordships have passed a very strong order .. after that still there are so many incidents where we have to move contempt proceedings. The number of IAs support this case.
Court: We don’t care if it is party A, B or C. We only care about the Constitution and the laws of the country. Our allegiance is to the oath we have taken.
Advocate General for Uttarakhand: We are disputing maintainability.. these petitions may be put for hearing.. we’ll set out in light of the Constitution bench judgement.
Court to ASG: You should tell your client that contempt should not be taken lightly. Our only object is public good. We have so many other cases, why are we taking this case? Rule of law, harmony
Another petitioner submits that calls of beheading have been made across the country: This is very serious. These calls, violence is happening. It is a very fundamental issue.
Justice BV Nagarathna: one of the great historic claims to liberty is the claim to speak, to publish and to make known..the claim to freedom of speech and expression includes free press.. thus in any society which aspires to be a democracy.. a free and balanced press is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The Gujarat High Court would shortly begin hearing the criminal revision application filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi seeking to suspend his conviction and two years jail term imposed on him by a Surat Court for his "All thieves have Modi surname" remark.
Case: Justice Ganguly's direction to the Secretary General of SC to produce official translation of the interview transcript before him
Supreme Court bench of Justices A S Bopanna and Hima Kohli to suo motu commence hearing at 8 pm #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read previous stories:
Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of Calcutta HC directs Supreme Court Secretary General to place his interview transcript before him by midnight | barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Manish Sisodia was the main architect and the brain behind the criminal conspiracy, Delhi court observes while denying him bail in the money laundering case related to the Delhi excise policy scam.
Special CBI Judge MK Nagpal holds that Sisodia was responsible for changing the eligibility criteria of the wholesalers and their profit margins and this was done without any discussions/deliberations in the Group of Ministers (GoM).
"It further emerges out from the above that this applicant was responsible for changing the GoM report unilaterally to suit the requirements of South lobby," the court said.
Client Benazeer Heena: we have a 1.5 year old son and is there nothing for me and my son in my personal law.. the three notices of divorce sent to me is not with his signature and its through three different lawyers.. we are on the roads with my 1.5 year old son... now this man… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: Are you providing for maintenance or not?
Sr Adv Divan: Please look at Justice Kaul's order he has clarified that he is not in the marriage
Benazeer Heena: no maintenance has been paid to me #supremecourt
#SupremeCourt hears a plea challenging Calcutta HC order directing the CBI to investigate an alleged scam in Municipal recruitments in West Bengal, taking note of the Enforcement Directorate's findings during its probe into the school jobs for bribes scam
CJI DY Chandrachud: no notice to State of West Bengal and they were not made made a party
ASG SV Raju: they were there but did not choose to appear
CJI: Appearance list does not record anyone from the state of west Bengal
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: no this was not done
Justice Narasimha: state was not heard and there seems to be uncertainty so you can go before the high court again
Sibal: instead of serving advocates of the state...they played mischief