Read on Twitter
1. Worth noting: In the #Dunphy lawsuit against #RudyGiuliani the plaintiff alleges that, in what appears to be in early 2019, while Giuliani was still Trump's attorney, #RudyGiuliani admitted to Noelle Dunphy that he and #45 were conspiring to sell pardons. 
2. It's significant that these allegations were made in a "verified complaint" thus they were made under penalty of perjury. As Trump's attorney they can be considered to be Trump's own admissions and are not hearsay. The allegations were stated as personal knowledge
3. and IMO could be used to establish the basis for a criminal investigation and support a finding of probable cause. I would think the finances of someone like #ElliottBroidy along with Giuliani and the the Trump crime family might be worth looking at to see if Broidy
4. spent $2 million on something not adequately explained around the time he received a pardon. Because whether the allegations were made by Trump's agent during the period of the agency is the critical fact in determining if the admission is admissible against Trump,
5. here's a @CNN report that Giuliani was still representing Trump in October 2019, well-after the apparent admission of a criminal conspiracy was made by Trump's attorney to Noelle Dunphy. and recounted under oath. @SDNYnews @DOJCrimDiv @FBIWFO @NewYorkFBI
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
