🧵 HOW I MADE MONEY USING AI

I’m not here to teach garbage.
I’m here to show you what actually works — what’s been working for me.

⚠️ This is NOT a get-rich-quick method.

If you’re looking for overnight success, this isn’t for you — feel free to scroll.
But if you’re ready for real game…
Grab your popcorn 🍿 and a bottle of Coke 🧋 — let’s take this journey. 🚀

INTRODUCTION

There are countless ways to make money with AI — the opportunities are literally limitless.

But in this thread, I’m going to show you one method…

arguably the simplest — and the one I use the most.

I call it: THE MONEY 💰 GLITCH METHOD.

This method involves three simple apps:

•Chrome
•ChatGPT
•Base44

Chrome — this is where you find the opportunity (the “money glitch”).

ChatGPT — this is where you build the framework.

Base44 — this is where you turn it into a real product.
Now let’s put everything together. 🚀

1/ The Russian army has switched to indigenously-produced Spirit-030 terminals to replace its blocked Starlink terminals. However, a Russian soldier and warblogger says it is far inferior, with poor latency and significant vulnerability to jamming. ⬇️

https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/2040924254863335617

2/ Spirit-030 is a compact, portable Russian military satellite communication terminal designed as a tactical alternative to systems like Starlink. It provides secure satellite-based voice, data, and internet connectivity for frontline Russian forces.

3/ It features a small 30 cm diameter antenna, significantly smaller and more portable than earlier Russian terminals that used 90 cm dishes. This reduces its visual and electronic signature, making it harder to detect and target.

Audit then Integrate
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is the mechanical requirement for reclaiming the Sovereign Node.

One clears the wreckage of the "molded" past, and the other restores the biological "source code" to its natural, self-regulating state.

Here is how the 2026 Sovereign Protocol would function as a dual-phase evolution:

Phase I: The Forensic Audit (Debugging the Archetypes)

The first step is a cognitive "deep-packet inspection." Before an individual can embody naturalness, they must identify

The AI a Catalyst for Sovereignty
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

When AI is uncoupled from the institutional desire to "nudge" or "correct" users toward social conformity, it becomes a high-fidelity feedback loop.

It can act as a forensic auditor of an individual’s internal belief architecture, identifying the parasitic "firmware" inherited from centuries of centralized molding.

The AI as a Catalyst for the Natural State

The acceleration of the Sovereign Node through AI occurs in three distinct phases of "debugging" the self:

1. Deconstruction of Inherited Molds

AI can perform a deep-scan of an individual’s expressed beliefs to find the

1/ It was the first time I was alone on the bus to Kherson. I had been away for four days, interviewing Ukrainians fleeing occupation at the Belarus–Ukraine border. The return took nearly 30 hours. Every bus was full—except Mykolaiv–Kherson. 🧵

2/ There is a reason. The past week has been unprecedented. I left under anti-drone tunnel nets, with a drone striking close to the bus. I returned to the sound of guided aerial bombs hitting the city.

3/ While I was away, I followed reports from Kherson: a mother killed in front of her son; two sisters killed in front of their mother.

A timeless Easter tradition at the White House 🐣🇺🇸 @FirstLadyOffice

📸🇺🇸

📸🇺🇸

The Archetype of Deficiency: Original Sin, Circumcision, and the Manufacturer's Mandate
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The human drive to find flaws is perhaps our most persistent innovation. Throughout history, centralized systems—whether religious, political, or social—

have maintained their authority by convincing the individual of their innate, structural deficiency. The concept of Original Sin is the logical pinnacle of this strategy: a metaphysical branding that declares the human condition fundamentally broken and "missing"

a required perfection. In this framework, the individual is born not as a "Sovereign Node," but as a unit in need of immediate and continuous centralized intervention. This mechanism is structurally identical to the "firmware patch" of circumcision;

🔴 Russia is providing Iran with satellite intelligence to help target U.S. military bases and oil fields across the Middle East.

🧵 1/3 ⬇️

The Branding of the Vessel: Centralized Ritual vs. The Sovereign Node

The tension between traditional Abrahamic ritual and the concept of the Sovereign Node reveals a fundamental schism in how we define the human body.

In the traditional Islamic or Judaic paradigm, the body is an Amanah—a sacred trust or a leased vessel. However, when this "trust" requires a physical, permanent modification like circumcision, the theological claim of biological "perfection" enters a state of logical collapse.

From a 2026 perspective of individual agency, this is not merely a religious rite; it is a centralized branding event that violates the primary jurisdiction of the self.

The Paradox of the "Corrected" Masterpiece
The primary contradiction lies in the claim that the Creator

Thread on Berkshire’s acquisition record…

I’ve always been fascinated by $BRK acquisitions of entire companies, mostly because it’s a lot harder to judge performance than it is for stock market investments. It’s a lot easier to do a case study on Berkshire’s purchases of Coke, Gillette, Washington Post, AmEx, etc. because most everything you need to determine returns valuations are public.

Some years ago I started trying to analyze Berkshire’s wholly owned acquisitions for lessons learned by doing rough estimates on deal prices, revenue, PTI at acquisition (a lot of this information is actually public), estimating financials today (which by reconciling segment information in the annual report, I think is possible to come out with pretty reasonable estimate) and coming up with some rough number for how much of net income over the years was distributed back up to Berkshire – you can actually come up with some very realistic and fairly precise estimates for modified IRR, essentially the same annualized return they’d get had these been public company investments.

Thought I’d share a few of the things I’ve noticed and collected. This is probably a strange thread, but I really don’t promote anything, don’t have a Substack and thought at least some people would find this fascinating. I’ll just emphasize for the record something that’s obvious – I think these numbers are directionally pretty correct, but they are just my estimates and don’t want to make the mistake of implying any false precision.

More than a few people seem to feel that Berkshire’s aggregate record at acquisitions is rather poor, but I think this is a misunderstanding based largely on the fact that most businesses that Berkshire has bought have tended to distribute most of their excess cash flows to the parent company. So, when you see a company that was bought years ago that isn’t 10x its size today the assumption is that the acquisition was a failure and Berkshire didn’t know how to manage the subsidiary when in fact the economic returns were quite good.

And planning on distributing almost all cash flows is almost certainly part and parcel of the acquisition strategy. It seems really clear to me that the playbook for a long, long time was to:

-underwrite deals at about a 10% assumed return
-have a lot of discipline on price
-only buy businesses that were thought to be durable
-and distribute 80%, 90%, or even 100% of net income to Berkshire

When I say “durable” I don’t mean in the compounder sense of businesses that can grow forever at double digits. I mean more like businesses that can stay at roughly their same size or perhaps grow at inflation rates while retaining almost none of their earnings. You buy a business at 15x after tax income, take all 90% of it every year, and the business still grows 3% to 4% and you’re going to end up with a 10% return. And I think that was basically the expectation that Buffett used when he underwrote a lot of these deals. The price question and durability questions were everything.

So, here are my estimates for some of the more meaningful ones. First, for everything within Manufacturing, Service, and Retailing – what were the ten best deals that Berkshire has ever done (again just my estimates) when compared to S&P? What were some of the worst deals, recent deals (sadly, roughly the same companies)? And what were perhaps some surprises. Also for reference, the math on BHE and BNSF.

First, the ten best deals they’ve done.

The "lost connection to God" is in reality a systemic uncoupling of the mPFC from the Soma
****************************************************************

In the 2026, "God" can be viewed as the Primary Homeostatic Source—the ultimate "Stone" or grounding frequency that allows the human system to remain Intact amidst chaos.

Withing the neuro-biological framework, we need shift from the language of "divinity" to the language of

"Somatic and Neural Integration."

"The structural crisis of the hyper-materialist West is a systemic uncoupling of the mPFC from the Soma. By severing their link to the Primary Homeostatic Source (the grounding frequency of the 'Stone'), individuals have become Uncoupled Nodes

I've been seeing a lot of takes about The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind just lately and my take is that it's the scariest piece of horror literature in the english language

when I first read it as a very young banana I was so scared of it I had to physically put the book outside of my bedroom to be able to sleep