Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
“Brief Pause” – The Black Hole in the Transcript Where My Civil Rights Were Traded: How Sanford Plotkin & Judge Murphy Rigged the Record – Detroit rockenhaus.com/brief-pause-th…
lol
@threadreaderapp unroll
This article has some information for you to be rejected as a sacrifice:
The sacrifice human should be the most pure and that person should accept to be sacrificed by himself/herself.
1. Make big lies once a year.
2. Repeat this sentence:
"I don't want to be killed."
The sacrifice human should be the most pure and that person should accept to be sacrificed by himself/herself.
1. Make big lies once a year.
2. Repeat this sentence:
"I don't want to be killed."
Since the world is in the hands of BAALists since 7000 years ago then you should repeat those two practices above to prevent them from making a sacrifice from you.
This Antichrist system is very dangerous and savage.
They don't do anything for fun.
So you make fun of whatever
This Antichrist system is very dangerous and savage.
They don't do anything for fun.
So you make fun of whatever
they do.
In the last 4 years, the police of Poland help them to prepare me as a human sacrifice.
Knowing their tricks, if one professional BAAList investigates whatever I have done then they will surely reject me as a sacrifice.
Don't be their food. Your flesh doesn't belong t em
In the last 4 years, the police of Poland help them to prepare me as a human sacrifice.
Knowing their tricks, if one professional BAAList investigates whatever I have done then they will surely reject me as a sacrifice.
Don't be their food. Your flesh doesn't belong t em
🧵United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)
Minute Entry:
Following today's detention hearing, Cole remains held without bond as the judge considers each side's motions.
1/5
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)
Minute Entry:
Following today's detention hearing, Cole remains held without bond as the judge considers each side's motions.
1/5
MINUTE ORDER:
A D.C. Superior Court grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Cole for the same two counts charged in the criminal complaint—18 U.S.C. 844(d) and 844(i).
This indictment has not been filed publicly but was presented to the judge yesterday.
2/5
A D.C. Superior Court grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Cole for the same two counts charged in the criminal complaint—18 U.S.C. 844(d) and 844(i).
This indictment has not been filed publicly but was presented to the judge yesterday.
2/5
Federal prosecutors using a local grand jury in this way is a new thing in DC. It came about thanks to the Trump Admin's push to neutralize criminal activity in the capital.
But the issue is currently before the Court of Appeals.
3/5
archive.is/14vO2
But the issue is currently before the Court of Appeals.
3/5
archive.is/14vO2
One of the Cow dung eaters is predicting the future.
How can those fathers of the Police of Poland tell the future?
It is easy! Prewritten scripture of BAALism(cow worshipping).
They don't predict, they just know after this age those cow dung eaters will start the eating dead 👇🏼
How can those fathers of the Police of Poland tell the future?
It is easy! Prewritten scripture of BAALism(cow worshipping).
They don't predict, they just know after this age those cow dung eaters will start the eating dead 👇🏼
Corpses of humans that will be slaughtered around the world.
The loop of BAALism is very clear. At the end of the cycle those Hindus will fill the places where the people will be slaughtered and they eat the dead corpses of humans in those places (Poland and the west).
The only👇🏼
The loop of BAALism is very clear. At the end of the cycle those Hindus will fill the places where the people will be slaughtered and they eat the dead corpses of humans in those places (Poland and the west).
The only👇🏼
reason a huge amounts of Indians filled the western countries is this.
Some who read this thread think that those Hindus don't physically eat the human corpses but read the sources:
hindutexts.org/violence-and-i…
Some who read this thread think that those Hindus don't physically eat the human corpses but read the sources:
hindutexts.org/violence-and-i…
Guess who shows up in the leaked contact list for Netanyahu's office? Rabbi Buttplug, AKA Shmuley Boteach.
This entry is on page 61 (of 107) on the contact list. It transliterates to "ḥṭwb ylwmš," which reversed is "shmwly bwth." But 'w' --> 'o', 'h' --> 'ch,' and most vowels have to be interpolated...so "Shmuley Boteach" fits.
🇮🇹🇬🇧 How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England by H. Graham Lowry 🧵
The “Glorious Revolution” of 1688 was not a revolution. It was the final, overt political and financial coup in Venice’s 200-year project to capture England. The Dutch Prince William of Orange—a Venetian proxy—invaded and seized the throne. His philosopher, John Locke, provided the ideological cover, while the Bank of England (1694) installed the permanent financial machinery of oligarchy. This moment locked England into its role as the new Venetian Empire.
Transcript 1/5: The “Glorious Revolution” Coup (1688-1701)
In December 1688, the armies of the Dutch Prince William of Orange invaded England, interrupting the Hobbesian nightmare the country had experienced under the deranged King Charles II and his brother James II. A worse nightmare was to follow when William seized the throne of James II, for he embodied a more highly distilled form of poison which Venice had perfected during its sway over the remains of the Dutch Republic. This outright usurpation is blithely referred to in British-Venetian parlance as the “Glorious Revolution”--which should give you some idea of how little regard for truth prevails in these circles.
The notion of “English rights and liberties” was quickly transformed from fiction to fraud under William’s dictatorial regime. When King James II fled to France, the rightful successor to the English throne was his eldest daughter Mary, who had married William of Orange reluctantly (he was a notorious homosexual). William’s demand to be declared king was never submitted to Parliament for a “constitutional” veneer. Instead, he summoned a special “convention,” which granted him full power, rather than simply the rank of the Queen’s Consort.
King William’s Venetian baggage included the evil John Locke, who became the chief propagandist for foisting the Bank of England on that hapless country in 1694. This was not the sort of bank you turned to for financial assistance. It was a gargantuan Venetian swindle, which promptly created England’s first national debt to finance ongoing wars of attrition in Europe, imposed a credit crunch by cutting the amount of circulating English coinage nearly in half, and loaded new taxes on an already-collapsing economy. The bank’s chief architect was Venetian Party leader Charles Montagu, William’s new chancellor of the exchequer, who later attained the loftier position of British ambassador to Venice. Montagu appointed the pathetic Sir Isaac Newton to oversee the “recoinage” swindle, and Newton repaid that debt by prostituting his own niece to serve as Montagu’s mistress.
The bank’s promotional hireling John Locke is better known as the peddler of the obscene notion that the human mind is nothing more than a tabula rasa--a passive register of animal sensations. He clearly had a higher regard for the cash register, however, and openly defended usury as a necessary service for those whose “estates” lie “in money.” Locke’s theories of government approximate those of a casino operator who lays down rules rigged for the house, under which the bestialized players compete for sums of money, which then define their worth as individuals. This is Locke’s “liberty” to pursue property. His notion of the “social contract,” which guarantees the players’ club members the right to enter the casino, was in fact advanced in order to justify William of Orange’s usurpation of the British throne. James II, in effect, was charged with having denied those rights to his more speculative subjects, thus breaking the contract. Locke argued that the Venetian mob was therefore entitled to move in under a new contract.
By 1697, the Venetian Party’s coup inside England was nearly total, and its members filled William’s “ship of state” from stem to stern. They looked forward to reducing a most troubling matter in the English colonies of America: the impulse toward building an independent nation, which had been driving the Venetians berserk since the 1630s founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In 1701, John Locke, as a member of England’s Board of Trade, advocated revoking all the independent charters of the American colonies, placing their economic activity under royal dictatorship, and banning their manufacture of any finished goods.
The “Glorious Revolution” of 1688 was not a revolution. It was the final, overt political and financial coup in Venice’s 200-year project to capture England. The Dutch Prince William of Orange—a Venetian proxy—invaded and seized the throne. His philosopher, John Locke, provided the ideological cover, while the Bank of England (1694) installed the permanent financial machinery of oligarchy. This moment locked England into its role as the new Venetian Empire.
Transcript 1/5: The “Glorious Revolution” Coup (1688-1701)
In December 1688, the armies of the Dutch Prince William of Orange invaded England, interrupting the Hobbesian nightmare the country had experienced under the deranged King Charles II and his brother James II. A worse nightmare was to follow when William seized the throne of James II, for he embodied a more highly distilled form of poison which Venice had perfected during its sway over the remains of the Dutch Republic. This outright usurpation is blithely referred to in British-Venetian parlance as the “Glorious Revolution”--which should give you some idea of how little regard for truth prevails in these circles.
The notion of “English rights and liberties” was quickly transformed from fiction to fraud under William’s dictatorial regime. When King James II fled to France, the rightful successor to the English throne was his eldest daughter Mary, who had married William of Orange reluctantly (he was a notorious homosexual). William’s demand to be declared king was never submitted to Parliament for a “constitutional” veneer. Instead, he summoned a special “convention,” which granted him full power, rather than simply the rank of the Queen’s Consort.
King William’s Venetian baggage included the evil John Locke, who became the chief propagandist for foisting the Bank of England on that hapless country in 1694. This was not the sort of bank you turned to for financial assistance. It was a gargantuan Venetian swindle, which promptly created England’s first national debt to finance ongoing wars of attrition in Europe, imposed a credit crunch by cutting the amount of circulating English coinage nearly in half, and loaded new taxes on an already-collapsing economy. The bank’s chief architect was Venetian Party leader Charles Montagu, William’s new chancellor of the exchequer, who later attained the loftier position of British ambassador to Venice. Montagu appointed the pathetic Sir Isaac Newton to oversee the “recoinage” swindle, and Newton repaid that debt by prostituting his own niece to serve as Montagu’s mistress.
The bank’s promotional hireling John Locke is better known as the peddler of the obscene notion that the human mind is nothing more than a tabula rasa--a passive register of animal sensations. He clearly had a higher regard for the cash register, however, and openly defended usury as a necessary service for those whose “estates” lie “in money.” Locke’s theories of government approximate those of a casino operator who lays down rules rigged for the house, under which the bestialized players compete for sums of money, which then define their worth as individuals. This is Locke’s “liberty” to pursue property. His notion of the “social contract,” which guarantees the players’ club members the right to enter the casino, was in fact advanced in order to justify William of Orange’s usurpation of the British throne. James II, in effect, was charged with having denied those rights to his more speculative subjects, thus breaking the contract. Locke argued that the Venetian mob was therefore entitled to move in under a new contract.
By 1697, the Venetian Party’s coup inside England was nearly total, and its members filled William’s “ship of state” from stem to stern. They looked forward to reducing a most troubling matter in the English colonies of America: the impulse toward building an independent nation, which had been driving the Venetians berserk since the 1630s founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In 1701, John Locke, as a member of England’s Board of Trade, advocated revoking all the independent charters of the American colonies, placing their economic activity under royal dictatorship, and banning their manufacture of any finished goods.
🇮🇹🇬🇧 How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England by H. Graham Lowry 🧵
As Venice consolidated its 1688 coup, a powerful intellectual counter-movement arose. Led by Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz and his ally Jonathan Swift, it defended the Renaissance concept of Imago Dei against the Venetian empiricism of Locke and Newton. Leibniz’s “science of happiness” and universal benevolence became the philosophical foundation for the American “pursuit of happiness,” directly influencing Franklin and the colonial republicans. This was the philosophical war for the American soul. This was the resistance the Venetian system could not tolerate.
Transcript 2/5: Leibniz builds anti-Venice movement
Yet, even as the Venetians were swaggering over their apparent triumph, a powerful republican opposition was building around a higher conception of the nature and purpose of man, which both inspired and opened the way for the later founding of the United States. Its leader was the great German scientist and statesman Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, who led what might well be called a movement for the pursuit of happiness--the ultimate goal of the liberty which America embraced in its Declaration of Independence.
In the face of the new Venetian onslaught in England, Leibniz set forth his view of human happiness, from the standpoint of man’s creation in Imago Dei. Writing “On the Notions of Right and Justice” in 1693, Leibniz defines charity as “universal benevolence,” which he calls the habit of loving, i.e., “to regard another’s happiness as one’s own.” That joy is first approximated, he says, in the contemplation of a beautiful painting by Raphael, for example, “by one who understands it, even if it brings no riches, in such a way that it is kept before his eyes and regarded with delight, as a symbol of love.”
When the object of delight “is at the same time also capable of happiness, his affection passes over into true love,” Leibniz says. “But the divine love surpasses other loves, because God can be loved with the greatest result, since nothing is at once happier than God, and nothing more beautiful and more worthy of happiness can be known than He.” And, since God possesses the ultimate wisdom, Leibniz says, “the notions of men are best satisfied if we say that wisdom is nothing else than the very science of happiness.”
As the leading scientist and philosopher of his day, Leibniz was widely known throughout Europe, and among such republican leaders of New England as the Winthrops and Mathers, later extending to include, most significantly, Benjamin Franklin. From the 1690s onward, Leibniz’s leading ally within England, Scotland, and Ireland, was the brilliant anti-Venetian polemicist Jonathan Swift, who directed a cultural onslaught against the bestial notions of Bacon, Hobbes, René Descartes, Newton, and Locke, for more than 40 years.
From the standpoint of reason, the Aristotelian empiricism of the likes of Descartes and Locke reduces the notion of man to the level of a mere beast, which, of course, is the prerequisite for imposing an empire of the sort the Venetians sought, then and now. When Jonathan Swift took up his cudgels on behalf of Leibniz’s refutation of empiricism, he ridiculed their enemies’ ideas for what they were: insane. Swift’s “A Digression on Madness,” in his 1696 work A Tale of a Tub, examines “the great introducers of new schemes in philosophy,” both ancient and modern. They were usually mistaken by all but their own followers, Swift says, “to have been persons crazed, or out of their wits;... agreeing for the most part in their several models, with their present undoubted successors in the academy of modern Bedlam.”
As Venice consolidated its 1688 coup, a powerful intellectual counter-movement arose. Led by Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz and his ally Jonathan Swift, it defended the Renaissance concept of Imago Dei against the Venetian empiricism of Locke and Newton. Leibniz’s “science of happiness” and universal benevolence became the philosophical foundation for the American “pursuit of happiness,” directly influencing Franklin and the colonial republicans. This was the philosophical war for the American soul. This was the resistance the Venetian system could not tolerate.
Transcript 2/5: Leibniz builds anti-Venice movement
Yet, even as the Venetians were swaggering over their apparent triumph, a powerful republican opposition was building around a higher conception of the nature and purpose of man, which both inspired and opened the way for the later founding of the United States. Its leader was the great German scientist and statesman Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, who led what might well be called a movement for the pursuit of happiness--the ultimate goal of the liberty which America embraced in its Declaration of Independence.
In the face of the new Venetian onslaught in England, Leibniz set forth his view of human happiness, from the standpoint of man’s creation in Imago Dei. Writing “On the Notions of Right and Justice” in 1693, Leibniz defines charity as “universal benevolence,” which he calls the habit of loving, i.e., “to regard another’s happiness as one’s own.” That joy is first approximated, he says, in the contemplation of a beautiful painting by Raphael, for example, “by one who understands it, even if it brings no riches, in such a way that it is kept before his eyes and regarded with delight, as a symbol of love.”
When the object of delight “is at the same time also capable of happiness, his affection passes over into true love,” Leibniz says. “But the divine love surpasses other loves, because God can be loved with the greatest result, since nothing is at once happier than God, and nothing more beautiful and more worthy of happiness can be known than He.” And, since God possesses the ultimate wisdom, Leibniz says, “the notions of men are best satisfied if we say that wisdom is nothing else than the very science of happiness.”
As the leading scientist and philosopher of his day, Leibniz was widely known throughout Europe, and among such republican leaders of New England as the Winthrops and Mathers, later extending to include, most significantly, Benjamin Franklin. From the 1690s onward, Leibniz’s leading ally within England, Scotland, and Ireland, was the brilliant anti-Venetian polemicist Jonathan Swift, who directed a cultural onslaught against the bestial notions of Bacon, Hobbes, René Descartes, Newton, and Locke, for more than 40 years.
From the standpoint of reason, the Aristotelian empiricism of the likes of Descartes and Locke reduces the notion of man to the level of a mere beast, which, of course, is the prerequisite for imposing an empire of the sort the Venetians sought, then and now. When Jonathan Swift took up his cudgels on behalf of Leibniz’s refutation of empiricism, he ridiculed their enemies’ ideas for what they were: insane. Swift’s “A Digression on Madness,” in his 1696 work A Tale of a Tub, examines “the great introducers of new schemes in philosophy,” both ancient and modern. They were usually mistaken by all but their own followers, Swift says, “to have been persons crazed, or out of their wits;... agreeing for the most part in their several models, with their present undoubted successors in the academy of modern Bedlam.”
🇮🇹🇬🇧 How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England by H. Graham Lowry 🧵
With the new Venetian regime entrenched, a network of oligarchical families—the Spencers, Godolphins, and Churchills—took control. To secure their power and enrich the state, they launched England into a decade-long war to destroy France, Europe’s leading economic power. This created a fatal vulnerability: the succession. With Anne becoming queen in 1702, the stage was set for the next confrontation between Venice and Leibniz’s anti-oligarchical forces. The Venetian coup now confronted its greatest internal threat.
Transcript 3/5: Oligarchical Families Move In
By 1701, the lunatics of the late-model incarnation of the Venetian Party had typically inbred a set of oligarchical families, mixing and matching Spencers, and Godolphins, and Churchills--the last headed by John Churchill, soon to become duke of Marlborough.
Churchill had begun as a page boy to Charles II in 1665, behind the skirts of his sister Arabella, the mistress of the king’s brother James. Then, for similar services rendered, Churchill received £10,000 from Charles II’s favorite mistress.
With things apparently moving so swimmingly, the Venetians set their course for their next major objective: the destruction of France, the most productive economic power in Europe. Under the ministry of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the patron of the scientific academy at Paris where Leibniz himself was engaged in the early 1670s, France had led the way in infrastructural and industrial development. So in 1701, England launched war on France. More than a decade of bloodshed and destruction followed--for the populations of both countries, and their European allies. It was yet another rigged game, in which Venice expected to be the only winner.
There are inevitably loose ends in any foul scheme. Queen Mary had died in 1694, leaving William without a direct heir. Her sister Anne was next in line to the throne, but the death of Anne’s only surviving child in 1700 presented a new succession crisis. An Act of Settlement was imposed in 1701. James I’s 71-year-old granddaughter Sophie, the head of the German House of Hanover, was designated as Anne’s successor. King William died in 1702, and Anne became queen of England.
As the Venetian Party expected, she quickly bestowed preeminence at court upon the duke and duchess of Marlborough, who had spun their webs of influence over her for many years. The problem for the Venetians, was that Sophie’s chief adviser and privy counsellor, was Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz.
With the new Venetian regime entrenched, a network of oligarchical families—the Spencers, Godolphins, and Churchills—took control. To secure their power and enrich the state, they launched England into a decade-long war to destroy France, Europe’s leading economic power. This created a fatal vulnerability: the succession. With Anne becoming queen in 1702, the stage was set for the next confrontation between Venice and Leibniz’s anti-oligarchical forces. The Venetian coup now confronted its greatest internal threat.
Transcript 3/5: Oligarchical Families Move In
By 1701, the lunatics of the late-model incarnation of the Venetian Party had typically inbred a set of oligarchical families, mixing and matching Spencers, and Godolphins, and Churchills--the last headed by John Churchill, soon to become duke of Marlborough.
Churchill had begun as a page boy to Charles II in 1665, behind the skirts of his sister Arabella, the mistress of the king’s brother James. Then, for similar services rendered, Churchill received £10,000 from Charles II’s favorite mistress.
With things apparently moving so swimmingly, the Venetians set their course for their next major objective: the destruction of France, the most productive economic power in Europe. Under the ministry of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the patron of the scientific academy at Paris where Leibniz himself was engaged in the early 1670s, France had led the way in infrastructural and industrial development. So in 1701, England launched war on France. More than a decade of bloodshed and destruction followed--for the populations of both countries, and their European allies. It was yet another rigged game, in which Venice expected to be the only winner.
There are inevitably loose ends in any foul scheme. Queen Mary had died in 1694, leaving William without a direct heir. Her sister Anne was next in line to the throne, but the death of Anne’s only surviving child in 1700 presented a new succession crisis. An Act of Settlement was imposed in 1701. James I’s 71-year-old granddaughter Sophie, the head of the German House of Hanover, was designated as Anne’s successor. King William died in 1702, and Anne became queen of England.
As the Venetian Party expected, she quickly bestowed preeminence at court upon the duke and duchess of Marlborough, who had spun their webs of influence over her for many years. The problem for the Venetians, was that Sophie’s chief adviser and privy counsellor, was Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz.
Introducing Voice-Agents: An All-New Enterprise-Grade Voice Agent Framework 🗣️👾
Building voice-enabled agentic workflows just got easier, faster, and more reliable.
Voice-Agents is an all-new production-ready Python framework that provides seamless integration with multiple TTS/STT providers, real-time streaming, and everything you need to build conversational agentic assistants.
> Multi-provider support: OpenAI, ElevenLabs, and Groq
> Real-time streaming for low-latency agent interactions
> Production-ready with enterprise-grade logging, telemetry, and error-handling
Learn more ⬇️🧵
Building voice-enabled agentic workflows just got easier, faster, and more reliable.
Voice-Agents is an all-new production-ready Python framework that provides seamless integration with multiple TTS/STT providers, real-time streaming, and everything you need to build conversational agentic assistants.
> Multi-provider support: OpenAI, ElevenLabs, and Groq
> Real-time streaming for low-latency agent interactions
> Production-ready with enterprise-grade logging, telemetry, and error-handling
Learn more ⬇️🧵
2 /
Multi-Provider TTS Support
Switch between providers effortlessly with a unified API. Whether you need OpenAI's natural voices, ElevenLabs' expressive options, or Groq's fast inference, Voice-Agents handles it all with consistent interfaces.
> 10+ OpenAI voices (alloy, nova, shimmer, and more)
> 30+ ElevenLabs voices with advanced voice control
> Unified stream_tts() function works across all providers
Examples: github.com/The-Swarm-Corp…
Multi-Provider TTS Support
Switch between providers effortlessly with a unified API. Whether you need OpenAI's natural voices, ElevenLabs' expressive options, or Groq's fast inference, Voice-Agents handles it all with consistent interfaces.
> 10+ OpenAI voices (alloy, nova, shimmer, and more)
> 30+ ElevenLabs voices with advanced voice control
> Unified stream_tts() function works across all providers
Examples: github.com/The-Swarm-Corp…
3 /
Real-Time Streaming Architecture
Built for agent-based systems that need low-latency audio streaming. Voice-Agents processes audio chunks as they arrive, enabling natural conversations without awkward pauses or delays.
> StreamingTTSCallback automatically speaks complete sentences from agent outputs
> Generator-based streaming for FastAPI and web applications
> Intelligent sentence detection for natural speech pauses
Github: github.com/The-Swarm-Corp…
Real-Time Streaming Architecture
Built for agent-based systems that need low-latency audio streaming. Voice-Agents processes audio chunks as they arrive, enabling natural conversations without awkward pauses or delays.
> StreamingTTSCallback automatically speaks complete sentences from agent outputs
> Generator-based streaming for FastAPI and web applications
> Intelligent sentence detection for natural speech pauses
Github: github.com/The-Swarm-Corp…
*MN GOV TIM WALZ JEW APPOINTS OPTUM TO AUDIT SOMALI HEALTHCARE FRAUD*
Viva Frei jew says ‘these might be coincidences,’ & follows with ‘they might be dots needing connected…’
Don’t worry, Viva. I connected them MONTHS/YEARS ago. It’s fraud. It’s Israel. It’s the end of Israel.
Viva Frei jew says ‘these might be coincidences,’ & follows with ‘they might be dots needing connected…’
Don’t worry, Viva. I connected them MONTHS/YEARS ago. It’s fraud. It’s Israel. It’s the end of Israel.
MDI HEALTH:
👺RICHARD MONTWILL
OPTUM, EVP
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, VP of Corp Dev
His wife, LAUREN MONTWILL, is VP of HEALTH EQUITY @ UNITEDHEALTH/OPTUM.
👺EITAN HYAM
ISRAELI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, Director General
👺RUTH RASKAS
UJA/MOSSAD, Chief Growth Officer
ANTHEM AI/ELEVANCE, VP
👺RICHARD MONTWILL
OPTUM, EVP
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, VP of Corp Dev
His wife, LAUREN MONTWILL, is VP of HEALTH EQUITY @ UNITEDHEALTH/OPTUM.
👺EITAN HYAM
ISRAELI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, Director General
👺RUTH RASKAS
UJA/MOSSAD, Chief Growth Officer
ANTHEM AI/ELEVANCE, VP
“What This Means for Your Targets
• RICHARD & LAUREN MONTWILL: CENTRAL to a system FORESEEABLY CAUSING DEATH FOR PROFIT. EVIDENCE MEETS CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE STANDARDS.”
And they work w/ISRAEL GOV’T OFFICIALS & MOSSAD OPERATIVES to MURDER U.S. TAXPAYERS AFTER STEALING FROM THEM.
• RICHARD & LAUREN MONTWILL: CENTRAL to a system FORESEEABLY CAUSING DEATH FOR PROFIT. EVIDENCE MEETS CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE STANDARDS.”
And they work w/ISRAEL GOV’T OFFICIALS & MOSSAD OPERATIVES to MURDER U.S. TAXPAYERS AFTER STEALING FROM THEM.
@legler_aaron @HennepinAtty @MaryMoriarty is quite correct that this is wrong, but Minnesota’s Somali community is very proud of its solidarity and cohesion, so it’s no surprise that the larger Somali community is being associated with its most famous members’ publicly-funded businesses and activities.
@legler_aaron @HennepinAtty @MaryMoriarty More Somali community cohesion.
alphanews.org/islamic-center…
alphanews.org/islamic-center…
@legler_aaron @HennepinAtty @MaryMoriarty from @StarTribune, here’s the instructions to the Feeding Our Future juror that accompanied the cash bribe.
This is how angry Americans are and rightfully so, with nearly $40 Trillion in debt and Social Security becoming insolvent in 2033.
Now imagine if millions of Americans did this.
Now imagine if millions of Americans did this.
Here’s another one.
Nationwide tax strike incoming.
Important brief from @Arranjnh for @ChinaBriefJT on the relationship between military power and the "new quality productive forces" that Xi Jinping has staked the future of the Chinese economy on.
If you have followed anything said by Chinese leaders since about 2020, you know that China has embarked on a grand quest to dominate 21st century science and technology. I wrote about that here: scholars-stage.org/saving-china-t…
The key idea here: a China that pioneers new technological frontiers and dominates high-industry manufacturing will grow itself out of its current economic problems and place itself at the center of the global economy for decades.
Michael Bay @michaelbay
I do not want your blood money 🩸💵
I want truth
Why were you at Epstein’s New Mexico Ranch?
Why do you lie about it?
Many of us want to know…
I do not want your blood money 🩸💵
I want truth
Why were you at Epstein’s New Mexico Ranch?
Why do you lie about it?
Many of us want to know…
