Thread Reader helps you read and share Twitter threads easily!
I'm @ThreadReaderApp a Twitter bot here to help you read threads more easily. To trigger me, you just have to reply to (or quote) any tweet of the thread you want to unroll and mention me with the "unroll" keyword and I'll send you a link back on Twitter 😀
— Thread Reader App (@threadreaderapp) November 25, 2017
X thread is series of posts by the same author connected with a line!
From any post in the thread, mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll
Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us easily!
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
Recent
Literally none of the things we have done to debase ourselves post-2024 needed to happen. We could have just taken a rest and watched Trump blow up the GOP then presented ourselves as the alternative. We lost by 1.5 percentage points for Christ's sake.
Just endless "The Democratic party brand is nationally toxic how can we make that worse?"
The endless fighting about Biden didn't need to happen. "Trans people? Under the bus?" didn't need to happen. Sticking our fingers in our ears while people frothed at the mouth about Jews didn't need to happen. Graham Platner most certainly didn't need to happen.
🚨 BREAKING: People are using GEMINI FREE to build a $1,000/day side income from stocks.
No expensive courses.
No Wall Street experience.
No 10-hour research sessions.
Just prompts → analysis → execution.
Here are 7 Claude prompts that can completely change how you trade 👇🧵
No expensive courses.
No Wall Street experience.
No 10-hour research sessions.
Just prompts → analysis → execution.
Here are 7 Claude prompts that can completely change how you trade 👇🧵
1. Find high-potential stocks
"Act as a professional stock analyst. Find 10 stocks with strong momentum, unusual volume, positive catalysts, and upside potential this week."
"Act as a professional stock analyst. Find 10 stocks with strong momentum, unusual volume, positive catalysts, and upside potential this week."
2. Build a smart watchlist
"Create a stock watchlist ranked by risk, growth potential, and probability of short-term movement."
"Create a stock watchlist ranked by risk, growth potential, and probability of short-term movement."
Alberta Independence
Every constitution promises that government serves the people. But promises are not mechanisms. Rights without enforcement are wishes. A performance covenant changes that by putting citizens — not institutions — at the center.
Every constitution promises that government serves the people. But promises are not mechanisms. Rights without enforcement are wishes. A performance covenant changes that by putting citizens — not institutions — at the center.
A performance covenant begins with a simple idea: Citizens have the right to know if government is delivering value — and the right to verify it. Not every four years. Not through slogans. But through measurable results.
This is not ideology. It is engineering. A performance covenant turns “government for the people” into a working system, not a political phrase. It binds government to outcomes that citizens can see, measure, and challenge.
1/ Most image-to-video prompts are too vague.
“Make this image move” usually gives you random motion, weird camera drift, or a clip that feels disconnected from the original image.
Here are 7 prompt patterns that work much better:
“Make this image move” usually gives you random motion, weird camera drift, or a clip that feels disconnected from the original image.
Here are 7 prompt patterns that work much better:
2/ Pattern 1: subject + motion
Don’t just describe the image. Describe what the main subject should do.
Weak:
“animate this product image”
Better:
“the camera slowly pushes in while soft light moves across the product surface”
Don’t just describe the image. Describe what the main subject should do.
Weak:
“animate this product image”
Better:
“the camera slowly pushes in while soft light moves across the product surface”
3/ Pattern 2: camera movement
AI video models respond well when you give them a simple camera direction.
Try:
- slow push-in
- gentle zoom out
- side-to-side pan
- handheld product shot
- orbit around the subject
One camera move is usually enough.
AI video models respond well when you give them a simple camera direction.
Try:
- slow push-in
- gentle zoom out
- side-to-side pan
- handheld product shot
- orbit around the subject
One camera move is usually enough.
Passive income is a scam sold to the GenZ middle class to keep them mediocre.
If you think a ₹10,000 SIP at 12% returns is going to build you a generational empire, you are being lied to.
Gujarati and Marwadi families build wealth doing the exact opposite👇🏻
If you think a ₹10,000 SIP at 12% returns is going to build you a generational empire, you are being lied to.
Gujarati and Marwadi families build wealth doing the exact opposite👇🏻
1. The ₹10k SIP math everyone loves:
₹10,000/month × 30 years × 12% = ₹3.5cr
Sounds good until you realize:
• Inflation ate 60% of it
• Your cousin’s family business compounded at 28% on active capital
• They didn’t wait 30 years
Passive income is a cope for people afraid of risk.
₹10,000/month × 30 years × 12% = ₹3.5cr
Sounds good until you realize:
• Inflation ate 60% of it
• Your cousin’s family business compounded at 28% on active capital
• They didn’t wait 30 years
Passive income is a cope for people afraid of risk.
2. Old Gujarati & Marwadi money doesn’t say let your money work for you.
They say: you work. Hard. For a decade.
Then your money has somewhere real to go.
The SIP crowd skips step one and wonders why they never reach step two.
They say: you work. Hard. For a decade.
Then your money has somewhere real to go.
The SIP crowd skips step one and wonders why they never reach step two.
1/6 🧵
And for the record. Those morons still hanging onto the 2020 steal, “60 courts dismissed the cases” canard — the intellectual crutch of people who’ve never actually read a single one of those rulings.
Let me dismantle this for the slow kids in the back.
And for the record. Those morons still hanging onto the 2020 steal, “60 courts dismissed the cases” canard — the intellectual crutch of people who’ve never actually read a single one of those rulings.
Let me dismantle this for the slow kids in the back.
2/6
⚖️ “Dozens of Courts Rejected the Claims!” — The Mother of All Misrepresentations
This talking point is a masterclass in conflating procedural dismissal with adjudication on the merits. The two are not remotely the same thing, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying to you or too lazy to check.
Standing: The Invisible Wall
The overwhelming majority of cases were tossed on standing — meaning the court never even looked at the evidence because it ruled the plaintiffs weren’t the right people to bring the suit.
Think about what that means: a judge says “you personally weren’t harmed enough to sue over this,” and the media reports it as “COURT REJECTS FRAUD CLAIMS.” That’s not a ruling on whether fraud happened. That’s a ruling on who gets to ask the question. It’s like a bouncer turning you away at the door and the newspapers reporting you lost the fight inside.
Laches: “You Waited Too Long”
Another chunk of dismissals came via laches — the doctrine that says you should’ve sued earlier. Again, zero examination of evidence. The court is saying, “we’re not even looking at your proof because of the calendar.” And this gets tallied as “another loss for Trump.”
Mootness: “The Election’s Over”
Several cases were dismissed as moot because the Electoral College had already voted or Biden had been certified. Translation: “You’re right that this might have been fraudulent, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” Not an exoneration. An expiration date.
The Merits Cases That Weren’t
When you strip out standing, laches, and mootness dismissals, the number of cases that actually reached the merits — where evidence was examined and ruled upon — shrinks to a tiny handful.
And even in those? Several judges acknowledged irregularities but ruled the margin was too large for the specific violations to have changed the outcome. That’s not “no fraud.” That’s “not enough fraud that we can quantify to flip the result." There’s a difference, and it matters.
⚖️ “Dozens of Courts Rejected the Claims!” — The Mother of All Misrepresentations
This talking point is a masterclass in conflating procedural dismissal with adjudication on the merits. The two are not remotely the same thing, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying to you or too lazy to check.
Standing: The Invisible Wall
The overwhelming majority of cases were tossed on standing — meaning the court never even looked at the evidence because it ruled the plaintiffs weren’t the right people to bring the suit.
Think about what that means: a judge says “you personally weren’t harmed enough to sue over this,” and the media reports it as “COURT REJECTS FRAUD CLAIMS.” That’s not a ruling on whether fraud happened. That’s a ruling on who gets to ask the question. It’s like a bouncer turning you away at the door and the newspapers reporting you lost the fight inside.
Laches: “You Waited Too Long”
Another chunk of dismissals came via laches — the doctrine that says you should’ve sued earlier. Again, zero examination of evidence. The court is saying, “we’re not even looking at your proof because of the calendar.” And this gets tallied as “another loss for Trump.”
Mootness: “The Election’s Over”
Several cases were dismissed as moot because the Electoral College had already voted or Biden had been certified. Translation: “You’re right that this might have been fraudulent, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” Not an exoneration. An expiration date.
The Merits Cases That Weren’t
When you strip out standing, laches, and mootness dismissals, the number of cases that actually reached the merits — where evidence was examined and ruled upon — shrinks to a tiny handful.
And even in those? Several judges acknowledged irregularities but ruled the margin was too large for the specific violations to have changed the outcome. That’s not “no fraud.” That’s “not enough fraud that we can quantify to flip the result." There’s a difference, and it matters.
3/6
🧮 The Math That Makes People Uncomfortable
Let’s talk about what didn’t get litigated because the courts never got there:
- The statistical anomalies in the swing-state vote dumps — abrupt spikes at 3 AM with 100% Biden shares
- The Antrim County, Michigan, forensic audit that found a 68% error rate in the Dominion system
- The Georgia surveillance footage of suitcases being pulled from under tables after observers were sent home
- The Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that were counted in violation of the state’s own election code — something Justice Alito and two other justices explicitly noted was unconstitutional
- The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL grants that effectively privatized election administration in Democratic strongholds
None of this was “debunked.” It was never reached.
🧮 The Math That Makes People Uncomfortable
Let’s talk about what didn’t get litigated because the courts never got there:
- The statistical anomalies in the swing-state vote dumps — abrupt spikes at 3 AM with 100% Biden shares
- The Antrim County, Michigan, forensic audit that found a 68% error rate in the Dominion system
- The Georgia surveillance footage of suitcases being pulled from under tables after observers were sent home
- The Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that were counted in violation of the state’s own election code — something Justice Alito and two other justices explicitly noted was unconstitutional
- The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL grants that effectively privatized election administration in Democratic strongholds
None of this was “debunked.” It was never reached.
1/
A quietly explosive High Court judgment this week should trouble every bank, fund and receiver relying on “standard” repossession and eviction practices.
Everyday Finance DAC v Clifford Kirk IEHC 349 is a line in the sand.
A quietly explosive High Court judgment this week should trouble every bank, fund and receiver relying on “standard” repossession and eviction practices.
Everyday Finance DAC v Clifford Kirk IEHC 349 is a line in the sand.
2/
Facts in plain terms:
•Cavan family home
•Wife on the title and mortgage
•2014 divorce settlement: house to be sold, ex‑husband has exclusive right to live there until sale
•He lives there since 2001, nearly 25 years in occupation
•Everyday Finance move to enforce years later
Facts in plain terms:
•Cavan family home
•Wife on the title and mortgage
•2014 divorce settlement: house to be sold, ex‑husband has exclusive right to live there until sale
•He lives there since 2001, nearly 25 years in occupation
•Everyday Finance move to enforce years later
3/
Possession proceedings were brought only against the ex‑wife.
The ex‑husband – in actual occupation from the outset – was never named, never served, but ultimately faced an 11‑person “paramilitary‑style” eviction team turning up at his door.
Possession proceedings were brought only against the ex‑wife.
The ex‑husband – in actual occupation from the outset – was never named, never served, but ultimately faced an 11‑person “paramilitary‑style” eviction team turning up at his door.
1/5 🧵
For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!
All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable.
For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!
All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable.
2/5
🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift
The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:
1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement
California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.
The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:
“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”
He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.
2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug
Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.
What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.
The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.
Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.
3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling
The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?
Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.
Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?
4. Blocking Signature Challenges
SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.
Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.
5. The Marina del Rey Case
Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.
🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift
The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:
1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement
California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.
The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:
“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”
He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.
2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug
Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.
What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.
The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.
Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.
3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling
The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?
Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.
Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?
4. Blocking Signature Challenges
SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.
Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.
5. The Marina del Rey Case
Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.
3/5
🧠 The “Nothing to See Here” Gaslighting
The institutional response follows a predictable script:
- “No evidence of widespread fraud” — because the system is designed to make detecting fraud nearly impossible. No ID, no chain of custody on ballot collection, signature challenges banned, voter rolls shielded from audit. You can’t find what you’ve structurally prevented anyone from looking for.
- “This is just how California counts votes” — as if a broken process becomes legitimate through repetition.
- “Trump has no evidence” — while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to prevent anyone from examining the evidence that would settle the question.
The American Enterprise Institute’s John Fortier is trotted out to say the delays are “consistent with past cycles” and people should just trust the process. This is the same think-tank apparatus that’s been wrong about everything for decades, now asking for blind faith. Fortier would be selling “Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment” in the 1890s.
🧠 The “Nothing to See Here” Gaslighting
The institutional response follows a predictable script:
- “No evidence of widespread fraud” — because the system is designed to make detecting fraud nearly impossible. No ID, no chain of custody on ballot collection, signature challenges banned, voter rolls shielded from audit. You can’t find what you’ve structurally prevented anyone from looking for.
- “This is just how California counts votes” — as if a broken process becomes legitimate through repetition.
- “Trump has no evidence” — while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to prevent anyone from examining the evidence that would settle the question.
The American Enterprise Institute’s John Fortier is trotted out to say the delays are “consistent with past cycles” and people should just trust the process. This is the same think-tank apparatus that’s been wrong about everything for decades, now asking for blind faith. Fortier would be selling “Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment” in the 1890s.
Are there any perverted male cops who wants to treat me like this???? I think about myself in this situation daily but I imagine myself being extremely young YOUNGER than this 👇👇👇👇
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP I get told I act like a child so since I get told this alot I know it and I am officially embracing it so does any perverted men preferably cops like a person who has child like tendencies if so I AM THE ONE FOR YOU I even thought about putting my hair like Wendy's girl 😁👍👍
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP 😁👍👍☝️☝️ @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @Ilovecanada13 @HarperMonste @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @MalaMoragain13 @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @Opiumbrella @threadreaderapp unroll @grok
Are there any perverted male cops who wants to treat me like this???? I think about myself in this situation daily but I imagine myself being extremely young YOUNGER than this 👇👇👇👇
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP I get told I act like a child so since I get told this alot I know it and I am officially embracing it so does any perverted men preferably cops like a person who has child like tendencies if so I AM THE ONE FOR YOU I even thought about putting my hair like Wendy's girl 😁👍👍
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP 😁👍👍☝️☝️ @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @Ilovecanada13 @HarperMonste @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @MalaMoragain13 @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @Opiumbrella @threadreaderapp unroll @grok
Are there any perverted male cops who wants to treat me like this???? I think about myself in this situation daily but I imagine myself being extremely young YOUNGER than this 👇👇👇👇
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP I get told I act like a child so since I get told this alot I know it and I am officially embracing it so does any perverted men preferably cops like a person who has child like tendencies if so I AM THE ONE FOR YOU I even thought about putting my hair like Wendy's girl 😁👍👍
@SurreyRCMP @surreyps @LangleyRCMP 😁👍👍☝️☝️ @ChrisPentecos @Nncim15 @Ilovecanada13 @HarperMonste @BarbaraDoduk @RegretlessBee @Cdnwatcher @Istandtoreason @facepalmchris @trustednerd @MalaMoragain13 @felixcruggins @CultureGuard @WaxMyBallsShow @FranLa9 @kfurneaux23 @Opiumbrella @threadreaderapp unroll @grok
Much of the media coverage of worsening health boils down to this:
Gasoline can't have worsened the fire, because the fire had already started.
Gasoline can't have worsened the fire, because the fire had already started.
Covid infections don't have to *cause* a problem to make it *worse*.
If you already have lung cancer, then you catch Covid, your chance of survival drops.
