Profile picture
Tom Nichols @RadioFreeTom
, 9 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Before I hit the rack, I have one GHWB story, and it's only indirect, and probably others who worked in DC have a similar recollection, but this is a good time to tell it in order to remind people not to be cynical about him, so I'll tell it.
/1
It was in 1990 in the lead-up to the first Gulf War. I was working in the Senate for John Heinz. And everyone was yelling about oil. (Bob Dole: O -I- L.) So Heinz had me finding out everything I could learn about oil and reserves and how much it would hurt us to lose it, etc. /2
And I didn't know anything about oil; I was brought in thinking we were going to do arms control with the Soviets in 1990. So I'm running around lost in piles of data about energy and pipelines and sanctions and all that stuff.
One day, Heinz has a meeting with Bush. /3
I think it was lunch or something. And he calls me after and says: "Forget all that stuff about oil."
And I'm like... uh, okay. *drops pile of economic data in the trash* But why?
/4
"The President is going to do this no matter what. He's convinced it's 1938 and this is a challenge to global order."

In other words, all that stuff Bush said about a new, rules-based order? He meant it. Every word.
/5
He reiterated to Heinz, as he did to others: he was going to reverse the invasion of Kuwait even if it meant impeachment. He felt he'd lived through this movie once already and he wasn't going to flush everything we'd achieved from 1945 to 1990. And that was that. /6
And for years after, when people would say that Bush did it for the Saudis, or for oil, or for the Houston oilmen, or any of that stuff, I remember my boss coming back to the office and saying: It's 1938, this is Munich, and the President is going to do this, period. /7
Maybe that's not a huge revelation to other folks, but I can tell you that we never really deliberated about oil very much after that, at least not in my office. Protecting the West's oil lifelines would have been enough of a reason to fight, but that's not why Bush did it. /8
I never thought about international politics the same way after that. I realized that the dry reasoning of academic realism wasn't how real people in power think about things like international order and war and peace. And I was glad for Bush being there. /9x
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Tom Nichols
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!