Thread by @csranga

Kerala CM says "If Thantri can't implement SC order on Sabarimala he should have resigned"

By this logic Sabarimala Deity can also leave His temple if he does not agree with flawed SC verdict ??

Why TPM demand for Hindu Deity Citizen Rights is important

telanganatoday.com/recognise-hind…

TDB is NOT the owner of the Ayyappa temple!!!! It is Sabarimala Deity in the form of Naishtika Brahmachari who is the owner

"TDB can remove Tantri
Devaswom Commissioner N. Vasu says the TDB, being the owner and custodian of the Ayyappa temple, has every right to remove him too."

"The legal fiction which has led to the recognition of a deity as a juristic person cannot be extended to the gamut of rights under Part III of the Constitution."

The above wrong SC interpretation of the Constitution is the root cause which needs to be addressed @narendramodi ji

Q. What is Constitutional Immorality ?
Ans
Take over Kingdom ruled by Deity after entering into a covenant agreement that Rights and Privileges would be protected in Constitution and one day interpret the same Constitution saying Deity does not have any rights under Constitution.

"Temples’ Protection Movement convener M.V. Soundararajan said it was time for Lord Ayyappa’s devotees to demand that the Centre ensure that Hindu deities were recognised as “citizens” so that no government or court can ignore the right of deities. "
thehindu.com/todays-paper/t…

Dear @M_Lekhi ji a great speech in the parliament yesterday that touched the hearts of crores of Hindu devotee. Kindly also initiate discussion in the Parliament on the demand of Temples Protection Movement for recognition of Hindu Deity Rights
telanganatoday.com/recognise-hind…

Dear @M_Lekhi ji along with recognition of Hindu Deity Rights include bar on conversion of Hindu Temple into a temple propagating atheism by Courts including Supreme Court and State Govts by strengthening Sec 4(1) of Central Places of Worship Act.

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1081722843337940992

"Defn of Secular Atheism in secular India :- No need to follow rules of lifeless Hindu deities in temples but following rules of Gods belonging to other religion is OK"

Secular Govts & Secular Courts funded by tax payer money are barred by Art 27 from promoting Secular Atheism.

"“God is my priority and I am prepared to forgo anything.” said Padmanabha Dasa who ruled Travancore kingdom on behalf of Deity and who could not tolerate any disrespect to Deity in sharp contrast with the attitude of modern rulers

thehindu.com/news/national/…

Left govt making planned move to impose atheism on people: Nair Service Society on Sabarimala issue
business-standard.com/article/pti-st…

Sec 3 read with Sec 6(3) of Central Places of Worship act bars conversion of a place of worship & makes it punishable

SC Const Bench in Shayara Bano case held "In this country, therefore, atheism would also form part of “religion"

Central Govt shld enquire into NSS allegation.

The SC recognition of Atheism as a Religion and NSS allegation that Kerala Govt is imposing Atheism in guise of impl Sabarimala SC judgement strengthens TPM earlier request to Central Govt headed by @narendramodi ji to invoke its powers under Art 256 and issue suitable direction.

SC in Shayra Bano case

24. “Religion” has been given the widest possible meaning by this Court in Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt.... In this country, therefore, atheism would also form part of “religion”.

With SC recognising atheism as a religion there is a need based on Sabarimala experience to relook at the way TDB is being constituted & the warning of Kerala HC "as putting the temple administration in the hands of non-believers will ruin the atmosphere and result in disaster."

Late R.C. Unnithan CPI-M leader to the C.P. Ramaswamy Iyer Commission reproduced in its report predicted that Political Parties will influence choice of TDB members and consequently the temple admin which is undesirable & some other method of constituting board should be devised.

TDB as per covenant was supposed to have members with same devotion to deity as Maharaja

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1081757811476844544

based on Sabarimala experience clear that party men in TDB when push comes to shove would align with propagating party religion of atheism & jettison deity's interests

In view of above central govt shld protect the rights of Tanthri who in contrast to the TDB has done his duty to protect deity's interests per covenant and didn't succumb to pressure to follow dictats of people in Govt following atheism religion.
@M_Lekhi thehindu.com/news/national/…

The root cause for Sabarimala issue is the approach of TDB which forgot its duty as legal representative of Sabarimala Deity and succumbed to the pressure of the Govt headed by party propagating atheism religion. The aftermath of SC judgement and actions of TDB demonstrates this

The actions of the TDB is a clear breach of the covenant entered into by Govt of India with Lord Padmanabha Swamy Deity and the Central Govt headed by @narendramodi ji has to enquire into this and recommend dismissal of the body to Kerala High Court. @M_Lekhi @Swamy39 @trramesh