,
5 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
A load bearing man was knocked out & an enormous human infrastructure has been crumbling as a result. What that complex really was isn’t yet understood. Keep in mind our universities became increasingly hostile to mavericks, partially explaining this creepy dependence on Epstein.
What do I believe? That there was no “Jeffrey Epstein” as we know him. There never was.
What we called Jeffrey Epstein was likely a fusion of an actor and a character, both with the name Jeffrey Epstein (a la Colbert). And whoever chose the actor to play the role likely goofed.
What we called Jeffrey Epstein was likely a fusion of an actor and a character, both with the name Jeffrey Epstein (a la Colbert). And whoever chose the actor to play the role likely goofed.
Lastly, I think that the authors of the preposterous character know that this was too big, too dumb and too public. It won’t stay hidden. Silencing everyone is not an option. Wrongdoing will have to be eventually admitted to save the thing that the complex was designed to serve.
Oh and one more thing. I’ve believed this since I met this ‘thing’ in 2004. Ask anyone I discussed Epstein with over the last 15 years since before his arrest & incarceration in Florida. He was so obviously a front that I used one weird phrase for 15 years: “JE is a construct.”
The idea was to make a huge bet that everyone would remember when it became clear. Everyone in the Edge world asked “What do you mean he’s a construct?!” Thus they will all remember this theory. This was a badly written character resembling no financial trading genius In history.
