-Toys aren’t gendered and masculinity is a construct so boys can play with girl toys
-If a boy plays with girl toys, he might actually be a girl
If you don’t see how these two propositions logically contradict each other, you’re too stupid to participate in this discussion
-If a boy plays with girl toys, he might actually be a girl
If you don’t see how these two propositions logically contradict each other, you’re too stupid to participate in this discussion
There are so many logical contradictions inherent in the left’s theory of gender that it can be hard to rank them, but this may well be the most glaring one.
Every time someone tries to prove that a little boy is really a little girl, they always always always mention that he likes dresses, dolls, and pink. Yet these SAME PEOPLE insist that dresses, dolls, and pink have nothing to do with being a girl and aren’t inherently feminine
One minute they are tearing down gender constructs, the next minute they are using gender constructs to prove that a human with a penis can really be female. They can’t decide if gender constructs are irrelevant or if they are so powerful and real that they override biology.
It’s not just that left wing gender theory is anti-scientific (though it is), it’s that the theory logically contradicts itself at every turn. And we haven’t even gotten into its many moral problems. And we don’t need to. It’s a bunch of self-refuting, superstitious nonsense.
