Adam Tucker: WAB Henry VIII powers
“The scrutiny procedures it seeks to enact are inadequate – so inadequate that it would be a constitutional mistake for Parliament to approve this aspect of the WAB without significant amendment”
@Keir_Starmer ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/10/24/ada…
“The scrutiny procedures it seeks to enact are inadequate – so inadequate that it would be a constitutional mistake for Parliament to approve this aspect of the WAB without significant amendment”
@Keir_Starmer ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/10/24/ada…
On the NI Protocol
This is quite alarming (Yes. You need to read the article)
But MPs @thomasbrake @Keir_Starmer @SamGyimah @Anna_Soubry @joannaccherry will need ample time to review this and work out how to secure far better scrutiny and ensure ALL MPs see it
@patricklohlein
This is quite alarming (Yes. You need to read the article)
But MPs @thomasbrake @Keir_Starmer @SamGyimah @Anna_Soubry @joannaccherry will need ample time to review this and work out how to secure far better scrutiny and ensure ALL MPs see it
@patricklohlein
3/. On Citizens Rights, equally as alarming @nickynoo007
4/
Hardly surprising Adam Tucker concludes @oletwinofficial @Sandbach
“the approach to scrutiny taken in the WAB is wholly unsatisfactory. It was rejected by Parliament last time it was proposed. It should be rejected again in favour of more intrusive scrutiny techniques.”
Hardly surprising Adam Tucker concludes @oletwinofficial @Sandbach
“the approach to scrutiny taken in the WAB is wholly unsatisfactory. It was rejected by Parliament last time it was proposed. It should be rejected again in favour of more intrusive scrutiny techniques.”
