The CIA waterboarded Mohammad 183 times.
Reminder, those with Pentagon access can view the hearing streaming at the Pentagon Library.
Public can also view at Ft. Meade.
They met multiple times in Location 4, early March 2003 where 'enhanced interrogation techniques' (EITs) occurred.
They also probably met at Location 7.
The date he first met Khalid Shaikh Mohammad is also classified.
Mitchell says he wasn't standing for 7 days; physicians wanted him to sit down to catch some catnaps. CIA used 'sleep deprivation' and 'sleep disruption' interchangeably.
On the stand though "maybe a bit of hyperbole, but not much. My intent was to say thousands of hours with all the detainees."
183 also number of times Mohammaed was water boarded.
"Three people water boarded him, three people were walled him."
They rotated staff so they wouldn't get tired and make mistakes.
Mitchell believes he was "Swigert."
"Dunbar" would be Dr. Bruce Jessen
Calls for #TheReport to be read with the CIA response "which debunks most of this analysis."
Mitchell categorically denies the characterization - "The CIA wasn't in the work of 'punishing.'"
Nevin: Some of them from Korea? S. America?
Mitchell says he's not familiar.
nytimes.com/2019/12/04/us/…
Mitchell: I downloaded it after leaving CIA...it seemed silly, like a conspiracy theory.
He said he wouldn't have done it if the techniques weren't legal.
Mitchell says it's the first he had heard that - it wasn't him, and whomever did it should have been sent home.
Nevin challenges the gross misunderstanding that because SERE trainees go through techniques without lasting harm, there would be no lasting harm in someone who didn't volunteer
"No, Morgan did. I've known Dr. Morgan for sometime."
“They’re not really scientists.”
nytimes.com/2014/12/11/hea…
Mitchell: I don't agree with the characterization that it was torture.
"Gul Rahman's cousin or something sued - they couldn't even get into the US because they were on a no-fly watch list."
Gul Rahman froze to death in a CIA black site.
Find @aclu's case here: aclu.org/cases/salim-v-…
Mitchell: Yes.
Nevin: How much was the settlement?
Objection.
Mitchell: There's a court order preventing me from saying the amount.
It's not my job to decide if something is true. That's someone else's job.
Side note: Drowning Pool played at Guantanamo in 2017
spin.com/2017/07/drowni…
Hmmmmmm🤔
Mohammad had several abrasions on his occipital.
This is one reason why def having access to actual black sites is vital to an appropriate and vigorous def.
But MilComs approved black site destruction w/out telling def. miamiherald.com/news/nation-wo…
Mitchell thought it was a lie the first time he heard about it. "Sounds crazy to me."
Nevin says forcing something into someone's rectum would constitute rape, no?
Objection - asked and answered.
Sustained.
"The preacher" would cup his hands around Mohammad's mouth in response.
Oh, that's much less troubling. Thanks for the clearing that up.
Mitchell sums up this opinion as just someone who didn't like waterboarding.
It is what it is."
Mitchell: "I don't care!"
At one point, Mitchell found him asleep on the waterboard. 'He was tired, I'm sure he was tired.'
Perhaps because he was being sleep deprived at the same time? Just a thought...
Mitchell: No, definitely not. Physician would have identified dissociation.
Judge and gov will have brief ex parte to figure it out.