And now I review the State of Serverless report, published by everyone's favorite Tinder For Pets company, @datadoghq. 
You can read the whole thing yourself without a paywall or registration gate: datadoghq.com/state-of-serve…
It's reasonably well done, so let's cut to the chase and make with the funny snarky bits.
It's reasonably well done, so let's cut to the chase and make with the funny snarky bits.
First, this is done from a basis of @datadoghq customers. So this is Lambda adoption *among companies who are willing to engage with a SaaS monitoring provider.*
And also are open to dating dogs.
And also are open to dating dogs.
If you're a "not gonna trust a third party with my monitoring" type, then you won't show up at all in this survey.
To their credit, they need to count five distinct Lambda functions invoked within a month, and they don't count their own Lambda log shipper. This is a great methodology.
They count EC2 usage as "over five instances" which just so happens to be where you exceed their free tier. One wonders.
I do wonder whether they're viewing Lamba adoption org-wide, or if their perspective is limited to individual AWS accounts. Large enterprises run everything, after all.
Their highlight of large enterprises driving adoption is both fascinating and inspired.
