1/ 2 persons attended church events while symptomatic on March 6-8 and later tested (+) for COVID-19 (primary cases).
The church pastor and his wife also attended these events and became ill ~4 days later (Mar 10-11) (index cases).
2/ The church was closed on Mar 12, but prior to that 92 people had attended church events from Mar 6-11.
Of those 92 people, 35* (38%) tested (+) for COVID-19.
Notably, this was 35 of the 45 people tested, representing a 77.7% positive test rate (!!)
3/ While adults (age > 18) comprised only 65% of attendees, they represented 92% of those who tested (+) for #COVID-19.
Children were under-represented in both % of tests and % of (+) tests, suggesting lower symptom burden and/or lower incidence of infection.
4/ Of this cohort of 92 churchgoers, 7 were hospitalized, and 3 died.
An additional 26 people in the community, who had not been to the church, but who had direct contact to those who had been to the church between March 6-11, tested (+) for #COVID-19, one of these people died.
5/ In total, *at least* 61 cases of COVID-19, 8 hospitalizations, and 4 deaths can be traced back to the indoor church activities attended by just 2 symptomatic persons (prior to their diagnosis with #COVID-19). 😲
6/ Takeaways:
1) This study demonstrates remarkably high contagiousness ("attack rate") of COVID-19 in a common setting (i.e. indoor church activities)
2) Hosting a large-group event indoors, without ensuring no attendees have COVID-19, risks the health of the entire community.
7/ Research ?'s to consider based on this paper: 1) Would wearing [clear] full face shields decrease the attack rate of COVID-19 in otherwise similar circumstances? 2) Same ? for cloth face covers 3) Same ? for surgical masks 4) Same ? for physical distancing (i.e. 6 ft minimum)
Given recent events with #POTUS, there's a renewed interest in the typical clinical course of #COVID19.
Here is a quick refresher for all audiences:
1) Symptoms severe enough for patients to seek hospital care often don't occur until 5-7 days after symptom onset.
a med🧵 1/
Week 2 of #COVID19 symptoms is, on average, the "danger window" when some patients become abruptly and critically ill.
2/
Week 3 of #COVID19 symptom--for patients who have been hospitalized with moderate or severe symptoms--is typically when we see them turn the corner and start improving.
The fact is we still don’t know what the long-term complications of #COVID19 will be, so student athletes cannot yet make an informed choice on the risks and benefits of playing.
(thread)
1/3
We know that if the Big 5 conferences decide to go ahead with football this fall, despite the unknown (but potentially serious!) risks to the athletes, many athletes will have circumstances that, rightly or wrongly, compel them to participate.
2/3
No scholarship is worth permanent disability from, say, cardiomyopathy from #COVID19.
I’d like to use some #popculture to highlight a truly awful, but yet-unmeasured impact of the current #COVID19 pandemic in the U.S.: restrictions on visitors to hospitals.
I’m currently reading Becoming by @MichelleObama. It’s fantastic.
Finished chapter 10 and...
...I couldn’t help but think of the countless people who've been robbed of this type of moment in their own lives because of COVID-19’s effect on hospital visitor policies. Perhaps it is just another unquantifiable tragedy in the midst of many in this pandemic...
...but I think it’s worth highlighting that the human costs of COVID-19 have and will go far beyond the mortality statistics, lost QALYs, etc. COVID-19 will also leave scars on many who never directly encountered the virus.
Great opinion piece in @statnews co-authored by my colleague @Ateevm re: why #telemedicine is already losing it's precarious foothold in the U.S. healthcare system. Below is a summary of their line of reasoning in 3 tweets 🧵💡
1/ Is my hospital workstation contaminated with SARS-CoV-2?
Here’s: #HowIreadThisPaper from @CDCgov's J of Emerging Inf Diseases on aerosol and surface distribution of the virus that causes COVID-19 in a hospital in Wuhan, China.
2/ Study goal: systematically assess contamination of hospital environment w/ SARS-CoV-2. Areas studied were a COVID+ ICU and an isolation general ward (“GW”). Authors stated the ICU had 15 pts w/ “severe” dz, and GW had 24 pts w/ “milder” dz. No mention of mechanical ventilation
3/ SETTING
🔦HIGHLIGHT #1: the layout of their COVID+ care units is pictured here. Does this look like your hospital’s COVID+ units?
I suspect the answer is a strong no. Take a look. This will be important in applying any of their results to your own hospital.