Today, European Democracy Consulting lodged an official complaint with the @EUombudsman against the Authority for #EuropeanParties over its implementation of transparency requirements.
The APPF was set up in 2014 to register, control and sanction European parties & foundations. It is the #EU’s party monitoring body and watchdog. As such, it has a key role for anything relating to #EuropeanParties. 2/14 appf.europa.eu/appf/en/author…
Regulation 1141/2014 establishes clear transparency requirements binding upon the APPF, the @Europarl_EN and European parties, aimed at ensuring that citizens and the #media have the means to know, engage with, and monitor #EuropeanParties. 3/14 eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…
In particular, it requires information about #EuropeanParties to be provided on a single website, including about sums received, financial statements, work programmes, name of donors and the value of their donations under certain conditions, sanctions & lists of member MEPs. 4/14
However, the APPF had consistently failed to meet both the letter and the spirit of these requirements, with information located on separate websites, not up-to-date, not in line with the Regulation’s requirements, or is missing entirely. 5/14
The information is often published as provided by #EuropeanParties, in separate scanned PDFs. The APPF does not consolidate information and no data is provided in machine-readable formats. This falls far short of any standard of visibility, clarity and user-friendliness. 6/14
This continued lack of public information, its incompleteness, the way it is displayed & the multiplicity of locations where it is stored are particularly damaging for citizens’ good understanding of #EuropeanParties that seek to represent them & that they vote for. #EP2019 7/14
This is especially important at the #European level, where citizens only have a limited familiarity with #EuropeanParties. The lack of a minimum visibility for EU parties guaranteed by the APPF has a direct impact on citizens’ choice-making ahead of EP elections. #EP2019 8/14
Why are we doing this? Because we consider political parties an essential component of representative democracy. The EU & citizens stand to gain from stronger, more affirmed & more visible #EuropeanParties with a closer link to the citizens they represent. #Europeademocracy 9/14
On 26 March, we notified the APPF of our intend to lodge a complaint within 3 months & provided an analysis of shortcomings & a report on #EP2019. To this day, the APPF has failed to take any remedial action to abide by its transparency requirements. 10/14 eudemocracy.eu/failure-appf-t…
We call on the APPF to consolidate all information on #EuropeanParties on a single website, ensure the information provided is clear, complete, understandable, up-to-date & consistently updated, matches the Regulation's requirements, & available in machine-readable formats. 11/14
We encourage them to go beyond basic requirements, as more information about #EuropeanParties is needed for the benefit of citizens. The @Europarl_EN's website can be a source of inspiration, as it lists electoral data in an interactive and clearly understandable manner. 12/14
The @APPF_EU unveiled the latest official MEP membership figures for #europeanparties, which will be used to calculate their entitlements to EU public funding. Here is what's what 👇
❌ Worthy of note: sharp nose-dive for virtually all pro-EU forces: @EPP, @PES_PSE, @ALDEParty, @europeangreens, @PDE_EDP, and EFA (even @europeanleft).
Only net winner: the @LeftAlliance_EU, but mostly because it starts from zero.
❌ Conversely, the winners (except ELA) are all on the hard/far-right: @PatriotsEU, @ECRparty, and ESN.
Today, @POLITICOEurope's Playbook reports on two EU political alliances missing out on EU funds "because the paperwork is too complicated". A great opportunity to discuss the funding of #europeanparties! 🥳🇪🇺
A quick 🧵... 1/23
@euleftalliance @APPF_EU @EDC_eudemocracy
First of all, what are we talking about? This is about a special stream of European public funding set aside for #europeanparties and distributed every year. Out of that envelope, 10% is distributed equally to all parties and 90% proportionally to their number of MEPs. 2/23
But, actually, this turns out to be more about registration than funding. In the meantime, if you want to really understand the funding of European parties, hear this way 👇 3/23 epfo.eu/understanding-…
Over the past several years, @EDC_eudemocracy has made many, many requests to the European Parliament to access decisions by its Bureau on the funding of #europeanparties. These included decisions for funding (for the coming year) and final accounts (which wrap up the process).
Invariably, these documents were provided with heavy redactions over the parts covering the EP's reasoning for its decisions: we could see the outcome (amounts), but not how decisions were made. Until yesterday, the latest full document related to funding for 2015 -- 8 years ago.
To be clear, the point of this thread is *not* to argue that TNLs will make our common election less European, simply that they will not remedy the election's core deficiency (that national parties are in control) and that, therefore, they are not the right way forward. 3/25