When we talk about simplifying administrative processes (#smartstate), we don't mean "big" things, just a collection of small things that contribute to making people's lives needlessly more complicated, especially abroad. Here's a silly example with a birth registration. 👇 1/7
A child is born in #Austria and registered with local authorities. Local authorities issue, for free, an original Austrian birth certificate in German and are thoughtful enough to include, for free, an original international birth certificate in multiple languages. 2/7
However, #French authorities will not accept the international birth certificate because it says "extract"; instead, they want a full version, even just in German. This requires us to book an appointment with local authorities and, this time, pay for a new original. 3/7
Now, what is the difference bt the international extract & the full German version, you ask? None. None at all. It's the exact same, but one says "extract" & the other one doesn't. We're not asked for the full international version, just for the same paper without "extract". 4/7
Is this the end of the world? No. Is it needlessly asking us to book an appointment, take up time & resources from public services (esp. with #covid restrictions) & pay a fee, all for nothing? Yes. And what is the point of the international version that isn't accepted? None. 5/7
What can we do? Not much but call upon the Min. for Interior (@Interieur_Gouv, @GDarmanin), EU affairs (@francediplo, @CBeaune) & EU authorities (@EUCouncil) to look into such nonsense and make a conscious effort to ease the lives of citizens and of their own administrations. 6/7
No one likes redundant administrative processes. Living abroad & loving a foreigner (esp. in the #EU) should not be a source of constant puzzles and needless complications like the one presented here. Small & smart reforms do go a long way for citizens. Thank you. 7/7 @VoltEuropa
PS: of course, public servants on both the Austrian 🇦🇹 (@StadtWien) and French 🇫🇷 (@France_Autriche) sides are great and helpful. But requirements come from above and they follow what is required of them by their ministries.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @APPF_EU unveiled the latest official MEP membership figures for #europeanparties, which will be used to calculate their entitlements to EU public funding. Here is what's what 👇
❌ Worthy of note: sharp nose-dive for virtually all pro-EU forces: @EPP, @PES_PSE, @ALDEParty, @europeangreens, @PDE_EDP, and EFA (even @europeanleft).
Only net winner: the @LeftAlliance_EU, but mostly because it starts from zero.
❌ Conversely, the winners (except ELA) are all on the hard/far-right: @PatriotsEU, @ECRparty, and ESN.
Today, @POLITICOEurope's Playbook reports on two EU political alliances missing out on EU funds "because the paperwork is too complicated". A great opportunity to discuss the funding of #europeanparties! 🥳🇪🇺
A quick 🧵... 1/23
@euleftalliance @APPF_EU @EDC_eudemocracy
First of all, what are we talking about? This is about a special stream of European public funding set aside for #europeanparties and distributed every year. Out of that envelope, 10% is distributed equally to all parties and 90% proportionally to their number of MEPs. 2/23
But, actually, this turns out to be more about registration than funding. In the meantime, if you want to really understand the funding of European parties, hear this way 👇 3/23 epfo.eu/understanding-…
Over the past several years, @EDC_eudemocracy has made many, many requests to the European Parliament to access decisions by its Bureau on the funding of #europeanparties. These included decisions for funding (for the coming year) and final accounts (which wrap up the process).
Invariably, these documents were provided with heavy redactions over the parts covering the EP's reasoning for its decisions: we could see the outcome (amounts), but not how decisions were made. Until yesterday, the latest full document related to funding for 2015 -- 8 years ago.
To be clear, the point of this thread is *not* to argue that TNLs will make our common election less European, simply that they will not remedy the election's core deficiency (that national parties are in control) and that, therefore, they are not the right way forward. 3/25