One thing I want to say to skeptics of #Cuties who are basing their judgement off how exhibitionist the dance moves are in it, especially in the final competition performance scene, is that while it can be okay to draw boundaries for kids wrt exhibitionism, 1/12
there will be instances where girls cross lines adults don't want them to cross, and there are appropriate and inappropriate ways to rebuke them; it is inappropriate to let boys/men feel entitled to exhibitionist girls'/women's bodies which, like all girls'/women's bodies, 2/12
boys/men do not have dominion over! Dance and sexual relationships have features in common, but not all of the body language that can be seen in both should be seen as explicitly sexual in all instances. While I believe that explicit sexual exhibitionism can occur in dance, 3/12
such as in Cuties, I also believe that it is entirely unacceptable to put the onus on girls and women to avoid becoming victims of boys and men who think perceiving a performance as sexually exhibitionist entitles them to sexual encounters with the performers. 4/12
I believe the girl actresses who made Cuties are willing and able messengers telling society that women and girls are going to keep moving their bodies and dressing in ways that men and boys think entitles them to sexual services, but that gives boys and men no right to 5/12
continue thinking like that. And that is a societal problem Cuties challenges us to address. There is another message in Cuties that Western culture, social media especially, gives girls ideas about gaining freedom, popularity, and status through sexualizing themselves, that 6/12
aren't healthy or safe. Within this message is the assumption that Western culture values girls and women too much for their bodies and too little for their skills, talents, intellect, ethics, personalities, or tastes. By making Cuties, Doucouré challenges us to think 7/12
about how we can teach boys & men to value girls & women as whole beings. It challenges us to think about how we can teach boys & men that they don't have dominion over girls' & women's bodies. I believe the girls who made Cuties know that they are sending these positive 8/12
messages into the world and as they grow older, I believe they will come to understand these messages more. I also believe that if you interview them in 10 or 15 years, they will not look back on making Cuties as an abusive experience. I am less confident they will not be 9/12
traumatized by all the slander of Maïmouna Doucouré, however. "Your director and parents forced you to make child porn to send the message that sexualization of children is bad, but you only succeeded in making porn for pedophiles and every adult who made this film 10/12
possible, including your parents, should be locked up and Emmanuel Macron should throw away the key" is a seriously hostile message to send to kids over participating in sexually exhibitionist dancing for a movie with a message. One has to draw a distinction 11/12
between controlling girls' bodies for their safety and controlling girls' bodies in order to oppress them or in a way that perpetuates rape culture and misogyny. I make no exception for girl actresses' bodies! 12/12
You see this "scrolling for hours" stuff a lot, but why is it bad if people are doing an activity they enjoy for hours? You may dance, or paint, or walk, or bike, or play chess, or play a musical instrument—for hours, so how is any of that different than watching TikTok?
I know this may sound strange, but I believe that it's cool if a teen wants to do a fun or social thing for hours at a time!! It doesn't have to be playing a sport. It doesn't have to be reading. It doesn't have to be playing a musical instrument.
And what is it with the use of "scrolling"? I don't really think going from one video to the next is scrolling. There's swiping away the video you just watched to reveal the next video.
"The second thing that I think one has to recognize is present is what I would call the combination of, and here, I'm focusing on something that would seek to answer the question of why is the pattern different in science and engineering, [quote continues…]
and why is the representation even lower and more problematic in science and engineering than it is in other fields. And here, you can get a fair distance, it seems to me, looking at a relatively simple hypothesis. [quote continues…]
It does appear that on many, many different human attributes—height, weight, propensity for criminality, overall IQ, mathematical ability, scientific ability—there is relatively clear evidence that whatever the difference in means-which can be debated— [quote continues…]
I think it's appropriate for any journalists, like the progressive and conservative journalists who have rushed to cast David Weigel as having been unjustly punished, to do so *instead* of QT'ing @oliverdarcy to decry the decision.
This includes a quoted tweet by an author who deleted the tweet (I can only imagine because of a torrent of abuse by misogynists). I have redacted their identity, so as to protect their privacy and safety.
Have any of these journalists decrying the suspension of Weigel read a single employee handbook in their lives? These are the harassment and social media sections from an employee handbook from a grocery store I worked at in 2018: