And if people start getting suspended for sharing the information relevant to this story I will be totally unsurprised.
In general, social media censorship has been ramped up for weeks, especially noticeable during the #Assange extradition hearing.
First the corporate hack-media refused to cover the #Assange story, which would have been their best legitimate shot of hitting Trump effectively for jailing a legit journalist. The same journalist that the legacy media idiocracy blamed for "installing" #Trump to begin with.
Then you see independent journalists like @VanessaBeeley attacked - journalists who also report skeptically on the role of the US and UK in the middle east. The #Assange precedent already in action, presumably.
Now #Twitter and #Facebook are censoring the NYPost's story to a never-before-seen-degree. Why? I imagine, to protect themselves from being hauled in front of Congress for InstallingTrumpforPutin2.0™ - should #Trump win.
This is where we are: social media platforms heavily censoring to cover their backsides from a rabid plutocracy that can't stand to face its own literal & figurative demons. Prosecution of journalists for reporting on IC lies and war crimes. List. Goes. On.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two new documentaries on the Jeffery #Epstein affair delve into lurid details and give voice to his victims, but both scratch the surface of the political and intelligence dimensions of the scandal.
Investigation Discovery premiered a three-hour special, “#WhoKilledJeffreyEpstein?” on May 31, the first segment in a three-part series, that focused on Epstein’s August 2019 death in federal custody. The special followed @netflix release of "#JeffreyEpsteinfilthyrich."
Neither documentary however deals at all with Epstein’s suspected ties to the world of intelligence.
"As the Becks note, the documented election interference forming the basis of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit has seen no investigation or prosecution, with their suit standing as the single exception."
"The party’s own defense counsel indicate that the DNC sees the democratic process in its nomination procedure as meaningless, with the real decisions determined by party insiders."
"Establishment media has hardly held them to account. DNC cheerleaders in the corporate press have not only ignored the fraud perpetrated by the @DNC in 2016, but some have argued that “Too Much Democracy is Bad for Democracy.”
"The Feb '17 @Consortiumnews article, by Arina Tuskanova exclusively for CN, was titled “A Nazi Skeleton in the Family Closet.” It reveals that Freeland lied about her grandfather’s past as an editor of a Nazi newspaper in occupied Poland during the war. " consortiumnews.com/2017/02/27/a-n…
@Consortiumnews Robert Parry, founder of Consortium News wrote regarding the reaction to Tuskanova's piece:
"Instead of fessing up and acknowledging these facts, Freeland chose to dissemble and slander journalists who were doing their job."
@DNC Clinton’s comments to the effect that @TulsiGabbard is being groomed by Russia & that @DrJillStein is a #RussianAsset were echoed by #DNC-friendly pundits, externalizing what Gabbard called the “rot” in the Democratic party onto domestic critics and a nation across the planet.
@DNC@TulsiGabbard@DrJillStein Establishment #Democrats and those who amplify them continue to project blame for the public’s doubt in the U.S. election process onto outside influence, despite the clear history of the party’s subversion of #electionintegrity.