22 October 2020 #BetweenTheLinesDotVote Analysis

Interesting. Very Interesting. A Big Day of Chart Updates.

I gotta say, I'm thinking some executives over at Dornsife are smacking their foreheads over the decision to include all these new charts! Here's today's data. Image
2) As I promised, I have been keeping up with the data daily, but only report on interesting new developments. Well, I saw yesterday that we were heading into interesting territory and yep, sure enough, today did not disappoint! Wait for it...
3) Nodding my head with analytical pride, just look at this chart. And, we have some doozies to come! This is the best.

Don't you just LOVE it when a good theory proves right? Wow, what a rush. Look at this, and tell me if you follow, will you? Image
4) We're now going to go slow. And, by the way, not only will this be a long thread, I will NOT be able to get it done before my business day begins. So, I'll pop in and out as needed. Okay...Periodicity Problem? Yeah. It's fun enough to follow out.
5) In 2016, Dornsife polled its entire sampling every week, 1/7th per day. This year, doubling their sample size, they had to cut to double the period time from 1 to 2 weeks, meaning, each week you get just half the sample. They even tried to correct the data thereby. Ha!
6) What I've been able to find is the precise leaning of each half of their sampling! Group 1 resists Trump. Group 2 supports him. I'm sure you realize that that completely invalidates the scientific basis of the endeavor, yes? If not, trust me, it does. No, don't trust me!
7) If there's a single key value in scientific discovery, it is the use of random sampling. If I'm able - as I am! - to identify the leanings of their two sample groups, then their sample groups are NOT randomized. I am NOT a scientist. I'm just a lowly analyst (I'm NOT lowly!).
8) But my chart analysis chops are, well, pretty damn good, and the chart above PROOVES beyond that shadow of a doubt that Dornsife has surrendered its right to claim science as its basis. Politics are its basis. I've proven it. A scientist should check out my work. Right?
9) Funny thing! This is the best damned data they have this year, non-randomized as it is. The rest of their data is so polluted as to be unworthy of notice. I chart none of their other data anymore. None. I've outlined this many times, but it must be repeated.
10) This data, driven by the following questions: Who do you think others in your state will vote for?, is the one and only question they employ now that matters. It is a surrogate question for this, their best one from 2016:

Who will win?
11) I'll soon give you more charts. But, stick with me, and theorize, why would Dornsife drop the question: Who will win?

I've realized there's only one possible answer. They already know Trump will win and do NOT want to hear that answer.
12) So, whoever it was that sneaked in this surrogate question should get offered a high paying job. If I was where I should be, I'd hire him or her in a happy heartbeat. Non-randomized as it is, this chart is still worth following. But, wait till you see what's coming!
13) Now let's look at the entire campaign and see where we're at.

I love this chart too. I love when a chart gives me a sense of the story it reports. My bet is that the positions are actually inverted. I don't think Biden ever had a chance. I don't. But, no matter. Look. Image
14) That's an interesting chart. It could even be real. I don't think so, as you know, because I have no faith in the underlying data. But, truth has a funny way of peaking out from under lies, like little shoots growing up in sidewalk cracks. This is a good story.
15) Let me express it my way. The media and the false polling outfits have tried and tried, with all the power in their means, to support an even worse candidate than Clinton2 was. They've shown their certain victory at every turn, by all and every means.
16) But they can't get the job done. Consider this new term, a technical campaign term, "We've put a lid on today's events." Clinton2 did the same thing, of course. But it had no formal name. Now, we have a name for it. Wow. And wow again, it ain't working. I'm shocked...not!
17) Technically, if I hadn't already made my call, the form below Trump's support line would give me the impetus to do so now. If you haven't killed him by now, then watch out, he's coming for you. Biden's dropping, Trump rising. Imagine that.
18) My first business meeting of the day is about to get started, so I have to break off analysis for the while. Before I go, though, a word to my Democratic friends. You can hear a tone in my voice of rage, of infuriation. And you're right. I see your leaders as cheaters.
19) I see them doing everything in their power to game the system. More, the system used to be adequately rigged so they didn't even have to try. I credit my guy Trump, and our MAGA Movement with making it MUCH harder for their rigging to protect them.
20) They've cheated the entire system for the last 4 years, and they've done so even more over the range of this election. I call them cheaters, and, yeah, I hate cheaters.
Many more charts to come, after coming business meeting and such...
Meeting went over, significantly, but it was a great meeting! I'll be back in a few moments and pick up again...
21) Let's look at that chart again. There's something particularly important about it. First, we see a clear resistance line that Biden, for all his aids, has never broken, not one time. It's between 48 and 48.5%. Just can't get it over that mark. Doesn't look to now. Image
22) Second, Trump shows a crystal clear support line, almost broken recently. What I call that is "form" beneath support. If he heads back down there again - as always, assuming this data meaningful - it won't be good. But he was ONLY down there for 2 tests, not 3.
23) We've discussed the Periodicity Problem, and see it at play again right now. This 2nd group supports Trump, and up his numbers are going. But, I think there's something vastly more profound in play, fundamentally. Where's Hunter? Biden's corruption appears to count.
24) Looking at the chart, we see that Biden's massive lead has fallen 4 times so far. He appears to be falling again now. If Trump rises and crosses over again, it may well be the path to victory. As I said, we'll be looking at these technicals more to come.
25) But before we leave this lovely chart, allow me to reminisce again about 2016. I will never forget the moment I was looking at the chart, and saw that the entire campaign had its own logic. You could see the whole thing, right there, in front of you by data. Wow!!!
26) To glance, that is precisely what we see here. This campaign, as seen, is a war between Biden's resistance and Trump's support. Trump's support cannot win, whereas Biden's resistance can. But only if he can sustain it, you know, playing out the clock.
27) If, on the other hand, he allows Trump to snatch the lead from him, it appears that will be the end. Of course, there's always the whimper factor of months in deadlock in courts and such. But, just following the charts, here we are. Where will the data lead us?
28) Today, as we have 3 Biden charts to cover, we certainly won't linger long on this one. I'd call this a meandering resistance, but a dictatorial one. You shall go no further, this resistance says. You know, there's this video of Biden saying, I looked at my watch... Image
29) This one's another absolute favorite chart. Two reasons. I drew it a long time ago, and haven't changed the markup since. Cool markup, right? Then, I love how both paths have been completely busted. As in BUSTED! You got caught cheating and here we see it! Image
30) 2 days past the projected victory line are NOT definitive. But they are also NOT good! I've always said Biden's resistance here has a certain "heavy" feel. If he's headed back down to or past support, we can hear a certain pleasantly plump lady warming up her vocal chords.
31) I'm told there's a debate tonight. Let's imagine Biden nails Trump to the floor. It could be his numbers will soar and he'll have a final victory path. Not a bet I'd take, but always possible. And, you can clearly see what he needs to accomplish. I do love this chart!
32) This is our last Biden chart, today. Again one who's markup I drew many days ago, and which remains unchanged. Here, we're 5 really bad days passed the break point. Really bad? Yeah, you hit it, fall, rise again, fall again. Exhaustion. Again, really, really bad. Image
33) This is our last chart of the day. We're only 2 days past the defeat line I drew some time ago. But when I saw the first day yesterday, I already knew. Well, again we have to mention our 2nd Dornsife Group who support Trump. We're in their days, now. Image
34) But viewing the long line, oh yeah!, we're back up into the channel, the lovely channel! If we break the support line a 3rd time, then it's broken. Right now, with two tests below, it's NOT reconfirmed, but it's also NOT broken! Think on that, yes? Image
35) I cannot say that the Defeat Path? line is broken, yet. It's only two days above it, and our line could drop right back down again to, or worse, below this line (which was also drawn many days ago). But I'm not feeling it. I'm feeling the opposite.
36) So that's my chart offering for today. I have no clue whether they're true or not. I do know that they're flawlessly true to the data I have. My suspicion, as you know, is that POTUS is vastly higher up than is shown, and that Biden has no chance.
37) Before we close out, let's return to the debate thing. I still hold that Trump won the last one, by laying down the clear and unbridgeable gap separating the Democratic Party's left from its middle. Brilliant. I am saying, there's no way to connect the two fighting halves.
38) And as to the winner or loser of tonight's debate, remember, Trump doesn't play to surface level victories, mere popularity contests. Every single thing he does is with actual victory in mind. He also doesn't fight to this demographic or that. He just fights.
39) This is my guess. In Trump's mind there's only a single question he pictures a voter facing...

Who will fight harder for me?

Every time they tell you Trump lost this or that, they never factor that question in. Never.
40) And there's a theory that it seems NO ONE uses, at least, none of the normal commentators. Here it is:

Maybe Trump was right?

You ask that question, and things look very different.
Thread ends at #40.
CIRRECTION ON LAST CHART: It stated the 16th of October. It was, in fact from today. I simply failed to update the actual date. I've now corrected for that, here: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Pasquale "Pat" Scopelliti


Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThyConsigliori

24 Oct
24 October 2020 #MAGAanalysis

The Beat Goes On

Are you a stickler for punctuality? I sure am. I make phone calls to the minute of the appointment. I show up for Zoom minutes a minute or two early. Face to face? Anything passed 15 minutes early is late. How about you?
2) I'd show the picture but if you're awake, you can go check yourself. Dornsife is over 2 hours late. In fact, in these early morning meanderings of mine, I don't remember the last time they published on time. For shame. And I really mean that.
3) For shame. When do you hear that phrase anymore? For victimhood is more likely. Since being punctual might put stress or pressure on someone, we must create a safe place for tardiness. Slack. We must not judge.

Not me. I am a fierce judge and trust my inner laws.
Read 24 tweets
23 Oct
23 October 2020 #BewtweenTheLinesDotVote Analysis

What a debate, and the day after charts!

Okay, okay, there's no way that last night's debate factors into today's charts, yes? Still, get ready to have some fun. And get ready for a ton of new charts! Here's the simple data. Image
2) Diving right in, here's our first chart of both parties. You'll just have to forgive me in advance for bragging rights. These two lines, Biden's Resistance and Trump's Support were drawn many weeks ago, and here they're still holding. Admit it. Impressive. Image
3) It may not look like it on the chart, but today's data is, in technical fact, the 7th crossover between the two campaigns. Everything may change again tomorrow, and if so, that'll be the 8th. But that's not my prediction. Here's my call. Crime pays, until it costs.
Read 38 tweets
21 Oct
21 October 2020 #MAGAanalysis

#TheInvisibleWar #WarWithChina #BidenCrimeFamily #CoveringTumpsSix Part 2

Yesterday's work seems to have garnered a fair amount of interest. Just using Twitter's numbers, it did well, relative to my typical reach. I am honored and grateful.
2) Yet, as I wrote it, and in the questions that thoughtful readers gave me after, I realized I'd left some important gaps uncovered. My hope, today, is to fill those gaps. I hope I can get this done in just today's thread, so 2 and done!
3) Let's begin with a little clarification of credit. First, I tagged and thanked @tamaraleighllc, but failed to say why! The reason is, she both introduced me to @Johnheretohelp and forwarded the thread he gave us about China. Thanks again, Gal. You're the best!
Read 46 tweets
21 Oct
21 October #BetweenTheLinesDotVote Analysis

Analysis Works! Check This Out!!

I started this analysis a few days ago, and knew I'd gotten my hands on something, but wasn't quite sure what. Now I know, and show in the chart below. They call this their Periodicity Problem.
2) It takes mental discipline to read this chart. I call it the Go On 3 problem. Do we go the instant we hear 3? Or, do we wait until the word "three" is completed? Do you count from the start of something, or from its end? Believe it or not, its actually an important problem.
3) To read this chart, you need to understand some fundamental information. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7! That's one week. Seven days. And, it marks roughly one half of Dornsife's respondents. I call them Group 1. And I denote their thoughts at the END of the week.
Read 16 tweets
20 Oct
20 October 2020 #MAGAanalysis

#TheInvisibleWar #WarWithChina #BidenCrimeFamily #CoveringTumpsSix

Following all those hashtags, we begin tonight with tremendous honor to @TuckerCarlson. He is, bar none, the most courageous journalist in America today. What a hero!
2) Before we dive in, honor goes out to two others. First, @tamaraleighllc who just got her account back!!! And 2nd to @Johnheretohelp. John ALWAYS calls out the hard truth you hear from so few others. And man, does he get the China issue. His work inspires tonight's analysis.
3) We've done this before, but it's time for a review of our rogues' gallery of POTUSes who sold our American Destiny to China. I'm going to go slowly on this. You'd think we'd begin with Nixon, and maybe we should, yet, I say no. My reason follows...
Read 53 tweets
19 Oct
Context: Anthony was riding the scooter like he was just walking on his feet. So, I gave him the bike and started working on my scootering skills - read that as lack of skills!
So here’s my question: how many of you know how to learn with your body, as opposed to your brain? It’s like this whole new universe to me! Example, leaning back changes stupas opposed to leaning forward. Who knows these things?
Anthony has 5 nothing but nets, and I haven’t hit a single basket yet, if any kind...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!